Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Jacky Johnson

Jacky Johnson has started 39 posts and replied 78 times.

Post: Does this sound fishy?

Jacky JohnsonPosted
  • Posts 79
  • Votes 9
Quote from @Michael Fraulo:

Yeah, that does sound a bit off. A listing agent refusing an inspection or withholding the report unless you have an agent is unusual, especially after just 2 days on market. It could be competitive pressure, or it could be the agent trying to control the process. If you're serious about the property, consider getting your own agent to help navigate it and protect your interests. Good luck. 


Yes the listing agent said a home inspection by the buyer is permissible only if the buyer's offer is accepted, I was like what?

Post: Does this sound fishy?

Jacky JohnsonPosted
  • Posts 79
  • Votes 9

I'm interested in a listed property by an agent. The property has been listed for 2 days and I wanted to hire a home inspector for the property because the home, although maybe a good deal, is selling about 33% below the market rate (an elder couple have been living in there before, but they passed away). When I called the listing agent to see if I can hire a home inspector and do an inspection for the property, the agent refused saying there has been many requests for a home inspection and a home inspection has already been done. But my question is that the property has been listed for only 2 days and there are so many requests already? Next I request the listing agent for a home inspection report and the listing agent said she can only email me the report if I were working with an agent, and won't directly send it to me. Does all this sound fishy?

Quote from @JD Martin:
Quote from @Jacky Johnson:

I have came across a property that is selling for about $300K and must be purchased with cash, and is sold for land value only. This entire property is two-story and has two units and a garage, and is considered to be a tear down. Lot size is around 6000 square foot and total square foot is about 1300. It's build near the 1950s with 2 beds and 2 baths. Utilities are on-site. The property type listed is vacant land. If I want to purchase this property as a investment property for renting and also for appreciation purposes. How do I know if this is a good deal? What do I need to do to make this property rentable? Thanks.

 Not too difficult really. Find comparable land values in that area, that are comparable in size to this lot, with like amenities (say electric/water/sewer already on the lot), and subtract the cost of demolishing and clearing the existing structures. Doesn't sound rentable unless you're going to build new on the property. 

How do I find comparable land values in a certain area? Thanks.

I have came across a property that is selling for about $300K and must be purchased with cash, and is sold for land value only. This entire property is two-story and has two units and a garage, and is considered to be a tear down. Lot size is around 6000 square foot and total square foot is about 1300. It's build near the 1950s with 2 beds and 2 baths. Utilities are on-site. The property type listed is vacant land. If I want to purchase this property as a investment property for renting and also for appreciation purposes. How do I know if this is a good deal? What do I need to do to make this property rentable? Thanks.

Quote from @Patricia Steiner:

I would just asks the question without a monetary tag; gauge interest first. I wouldn't even badmouth the ugly thing - I would just ask if they might have any interest in joining you in replacing a portion of the fence.  If they seem agreeable, then you can ask if they would prefer to cut the cost down the middle or would they prefer to purchase the supplies and you will assume the cost of labor to install it.  This is when your role as a landlord now becomes the role of Ambassador.

You got this.  (And, hopefully a new fence).


Thanks for the advice! If they said they don't want to share the cost of replacing it, can I just cover the labor and material myself if I want to replace that portion of the fence? Do you suggest doing like this?

Quote from @Patricia Steiner:

How did you determine that?  Not questioning your judgement/assessment, just trying to understand the situation to best advise you.  Generally, the 'bad' side of the fence faces the owner. And, even when the fence sits on the property line, there is an argument as to ownership that can be made.

If it were me, I would ask if they would be interested in sharing the cost of replacing the fence. Their money, your labor is a potential disaster in the making; what if they don't like the install?  How will the fence be maintained and by whom afterwards?  And, how do you show equitable value?  

It seems like it should be just so easy - and these situations rarely are...a hostile neighbor is costly.  Tread lightly.  

Thanks. How should I go about "sharing the cost of replacing the fence"?


Quote from @Patricia Steiner:

Who owns the fence?  If they do, you may have a chance under the scenario you're proposing - if they share your concern for it's condition (although that seems unlikely since they've been living with it the way it is for some time, it seems).

If you own it, it's pretty lowbrow to expect a neighbor to invest in your property.  I would also be a hard no; I don't subsidize other people's investments.


The fence is shared by both of us, how should I proceed in this scenario? Thanks.

Quote from @Russell Brazil:

If I were the neighbor, it sounds like I'd be the only one bringing money to the table so you could get something you want. I'd be a hard no in their position.


But I supply labor on my side?

I wanted to replace part of adjoining fences between my neighbor and my property because they were old and stale. I was thinking if I can talk to my neighbor about sharing the cost (I, the landlord, personally provide labor and my neighbor provide material (e.g. fence pickets)). Is this approach appropriate? What are the pros and cons of this approach? Thanks.

I have a storage room that is old and worn (leaks rain and has a smell of rat droppings) that I have a plan to tear down and rebuild in the near future. I'm looking for an architect and a general contractor (not sure if I need more). What kind of contractors should I be hiring? I have a neighbor across the street who is licensed and does general construction and fine carpentry and another neighbor from a different place who is an architect (not sure if licensed or not). I'm deliberating whether I should hire my neighbor (he just had leg surgery and walking with a cane) across the street to do construction because if the construction turns out bad, I strain the relationship with the neighbor across the street, and also whether I should hire my neighbor from another place who does the design because I kinda don't prefer he knows where I live (just because if the design turns out bad, I strain another relationship with him and exposes my address of where I live). How should I proceed? Thank you.