Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Jack M.

Jack M. has started 6 posts and replied 29 times.

Post: How important is it to follow the 50% or 2% rule.

Jack M.Posted
  • Investor
  • Quincy, MA
  • Posts 30
  • Votes 14

I've turned my property over twice (meaning I'm on my 3rd tenant). First tenant did about $5,000 in damage after being in the house for two years. She had a bunch of pets she wasn't supposed to have, and the whole place had to be re-carpeted and repainted. She was also a bit of a hoarder, and it took a bit to clean out the place. It sat vacant for two months, which cost another $2500 in lost rent. So, that averages out to about $3800 a year in just that, plus there were some smaller repairs in between.

The tenant after that skipped out on paying a month's rent and getting it ready for the next tenant cost me $2500 out of pocket (including court costs for eviction. This is after I kept the security deposit). Then, it was vacant for a month. That's about $5000, and they were there for 16 months, so that's about another about $3800 a year.

So for my single family home, it's pretty consistently $3800 a year not counting smaller repairs and not counting any big CapEX expenditures.

The thought that you're only going to spend $2500 per year per unit is just pure fantasy. 

Post: How important is it to follow the 50% or 2% rule.

Jack M.Posted
  • Investor
  • Quincy, MA
  • Posts 30
  • Votes 14

Long run or not, cash flow is cash flow. Having a nest egg doesn't change the calculations one bit. 

Post: How important is it to follow the 50% or 2% rule.

Jack M.Posted
  • Investor
  • Quincy, MA
  • Posts 30
  • Votes 14
Originally posted by @Nate Wilson:

but even if I had to dump $5000 a year into it that stil leaves me with $4600-$7000 yearly profits. 

Why do you think you'd only need to spend $5000 a year on it? 

Vacancy alone will likely cost you about 2k, and when the tenant leaves, how sure are you that they won't trash the place, or at least leave it messy?

What about when you need a new water heater in 5 years, or a new roof in 10 years? 

How exactly did you come up with your $5000 figure? Was it just a random guess? Did you try using the calculator under the "tools" tab above? 

Post: New Member from Massachusetts

Jack M.Posted
  • Investor
  • Quincy, MA
  • Posts 30
  • Votes 14

Welcome.

Post: Shopping for Full Service Property Management in Odenton, MD

Jack M.Posted
  • Investor
  • Quincy, MA
  • Posts 30
  • Votes 14

I use a company called Pioneer Enterprises, and so does my wife. They're okay. Sometimes, their response time is a little slow when communicating with the office, and I had an issue with them not collecting a late fee from a tenant (and accepting partial payments when I said they shouldn't), but other than that, they get stuff done.

Post: Am I Ready to Start Investing??

Jack M.Posted
  • Investor
  • Quincy, MA
  • Posts 30
  • Votes 14

It seems like paying off your credit cards first might make sense, unless you have an extraordinarily low interest rate.

If you're paying something around 10% interest on your credit card, you can get an instant 10% return on your money by just paying it off, and that's a 10% return with 0 risk. 

Post: Buying investment property before buying own house

Jack M.Posted
  • Investor
  • Quincy, MA
  • Posts 30
  • Votes 14

It doesn't solely have to be a financial decision.

I personally love living in a luxury apartment, and I don't care that I'm paying more for it than I would a mortgage. I don't have to deal with anything if something breaks, I don't have to shovel snow, and if I ever want to move I can just pack up and move with a couple months notice.

Post: A question before I sign up for a real estate license class

Jack M.Posted
  • Investor
  • Quincy, MA
  • Posts 30
  • Votes 14

What hassle is there? 

It looks like it's just 12 hours of continuing education every 2 years and a small fee. You're saying there's a lot more to it?

Post: When is a good time for a pro account?

Jack M.Posted
  • Investor
  • Quincy, MA
  • Posts 30
  • Votes 14

If $23 bucks will break you, you're not ready to invest in real estate, imo. (It's 23 because they often have coupon codes). 

I like playing with the calculators, and I'm too lazy to replicate them in excel myself. And I think this is a good service and am happy to support BP. 

Post: Obtaining real estate license as an investor

Jack M.Posted
  • Investor
  • Quincy, MA
  • Posts 30
  • Votes 14
Originally posted by @Donny Widjaja:

If you think having a real estate license will give you the educational benefit for an investor, you might be wrong. I've just listened to BiggerPocket Podcast #153, they briefly talked about how most real estate agents does not know how to work with investors.  

Furthermore, an investor friend who has a real estate license told me that not having a license can be beneficial for RE Investor because you can "lie" to the seller.

Once you have a real estate agent license, you have to follow their rules. Such as, you must give a seller a true value of the CMA. It is not easy for you to tell someone that their house worth $150K but you only want to pay them $100K.

 Why should you have to tell the seller any price at all?

If a seller has a house listed for $150k, surely a buyer can't get in trouble for putting in a lowball offer of $100k, even if that buyer is a real estate agent.

Now if you're arguing that you should be able to say "I've done an in-depth CMA, and it says that your home is only worth $100k," then yeah, you have a point. That's just fraud.

I just don't see where you have to tell the seller anything at all.