Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Igor Messano

Igor Messano has started 30 posts and replied 176 times.

(duplicated)

Post: Notifying Other Tenants of Service Animal

Igor MessanoPosted
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 177
  • Votes 64
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

@Matt Ryan The other tenants could put you on the spot if they ask to see the documentation that the animal is a registered service animal, and they have the right to see it, so they feel the landlord is doing their job.

 Sorry to say but this is completely wrong. For starters there is no "documentation" for a service animal. You can go out and buy some service animal papers from some online company that will give you a card and a patch but all they are doing is selling you crap with no legal standing. Read the service animal laws. None specify any certifications for the animal. The only requirement is that the animal provides a needed medical assistance. This means that a person can have an animal for "emotional support". Another detail is that you as a landlord may not ask about the persons medical needs or disabilities that are remedied by the service animal as that could easily trigger discrimination claims, which means they do not need to present any doctor's notes.

This is how so many people today abuse both the fair housing laws as well as fly with dogs for free in commercial planes. There is no legislation that requires the animal owner to provide any proof and puts a great deal of liability on anyone that tries to challenge them. If you challenge someone posing as a service animal owner you could get lucky and later down the road prove in court they didn't have a need (at that point they would need to provide something) but at the risk of not winning and being sued. And what do you win by proving them wrong? The right to not rent to them and nothing more.

Additionally, I don't see how any tenant has the right to see anything related to another tenants rights. Policies are simple, no animals allowed besides service animals and that is it. They are not entitled to verify if I am applying the same rules to all tenants and neither am I at liberty to discuss another tenants legal rights and needs. You need to be firm with the tenants but fair. This does not mean you have to provide proof or explanations every time you rent to someone in a slightly different situation.

Post: Best way to invest with $20-$25K?

Igor MessanoPosted
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 177
  • Votes 64

@Lisa Phillips,

Hi Lisa,

I also invest in low income housing and looking at your profile I would love to join your group. However, following the provided link all I see is a signup for "13 tips". Is this group a BP sub forum or a separate place?

Post: Best way to invest with $20-$25K?

Igor MessanoPosted
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 177
  • Votes 64
Originally posted by @Raeshelle C.:
Originally posted by @Andrey Y.:
Originally posted by @Raeshelle C.:
Originally posted by @Andrey Y.:
Originally posted by @Raeshelle C.:

I'm currently saving right now, but I estimate that in 3 years I will have saved $20K-$25K. I'm 27.

I want to make $10K/mo and retire early. What I'm having trouble with is, if I use that $20-25K on real estate, I need help finding out how I should begin with my investing. I know I am just saving now, but I like to create a plan. I don't know which is the best path to go down if I want to make $10K/mo within 10 years of buying my first rental. I live in MA and houses here are not cheap. What I'd like to do is buy multifamilies that are in fair/good condition (no repairs needed) using the FHA loan, but all the multifamilies around here that's cheap, near where I work, all need repairs. The cheap multifamilies that dont need work are far from my job so I can't live in them with FHA. I don't have extra money to pay for repairs, and saving extra for that would take even longer, and that would delay my wealth.

Then I was thinking, I'll just invest in out-of-state turnkey single families in places like Alabama, Georgia and Florida because down payments for those houses would be cheap, since the houses down there are cheap. But I would also be taking out one loan after another to buy these single family houses. I fear I would get rejected by the banks, like they may not allow me to have all these loans; I also fear it's too dangerous to take out so many loans too (I cant buy houses in cash). I know I'd only be making around $250/mo in cash flow after expenses too, per turnkey single family house, in the first couple years. I just really don't know what the best option is as far as real estate investing, that's doable for me. I'd only have $20-25K to start with.

Can anyone give strategies?

Your fears in the last paragraph are correct. If something is cheap, its cheap for a reason -- ie. people don't want it. That should tell you if you should invest there.

You want to find properties in a great location, not expensive, and require no repairs. I hate to break it to you, but that is a dream. You are going to have to bust your butt to create value. Everyone wants to (or thinks they do) make $10/month and retire early.

You are pretty young, keep educating yourself, and level up your mind and mindset. Don't save too much money. Go out, travel and get a feel of how people are living, what else is out there, and get some perspective. Or give some of your money to a good cause. Figure out what your goals are from there. You may realize you need a lot less or a lot more than $10k a month.

Saving doesn't work as a general strategy. You cannot shrink your way to wealth. It only works for Dave Ramsey or Suze Orman who are making money to tell people they should save their pennies. Good luck!

 I disagree. I know myself. I'm not a naive little girl that doesn't know myself, what I want or anything about life. I know that I want to make $10K/mo. $5K after taxes will also do. 

I've traveled and do continue to, and live.

Saving money will get me there. It does work. Just because it didn't work for you doesn't mean it won't work for me. 

I will give money to causes once I have the money to give. 

I already know what my goals are.

I listened to an audio book, The Science of Getting Rich, and it warned me about not getting distracted or discouraged from people that say the things you do. So, I'll just keep scrolling and keep on working towards my goals. I will get there. I've already decided.

Name me one person that has created wealth or financial independence by "saving money"? It has never happened, not to me nor anyone else. All saving money does is decrease your quality of life. You can only save so much, probably not much more than you already do. Wealth is created by income generation, which takes as much effort as saving money, if not less. Say you have been supporting yourself on $3k a month for the last year or two, you will be very hard pressed to go down to $2.5k a month, if you don't believe me, then try it.

You're reply comes off as defensive. There is likely an underlying reason why you felt that way. No one told you to stop working towards your goals, by the way.

I'm not arguing with you. I'm going to save and I'm going to buy with my savings. It's GOING to happen. 100%. It's not going to magically not happen now because you said it won't. You basically just dismissed every investor on this forum. Or maybe you're saying I'm dumber than every investor on this forum and can't and won't do what they all already did. I will save and buy.  And when I do, I will post here that I did, and I will tag you so that you don't come on other people's posts in the future arguing with them, telling what's not going to work for them. Have a good night. 

I think what Andrey is trying to explain to you is that simple saving your money and thinking that with only that you will make 10K per month in 10 years doesn't add up. That is not to say that you won't get to your goal, but it does mean that in the current rate that you are saving you aren't going to get there with that strategy. In 3 years when you have 24K and you buy your first rental, what happens then? You wait another 2-3 years to save enough again? 

A $55,000 home will cost you more than 12K to acquire traditionally. Unfortunately with the exception of transfer taxes which is a % of the price, closing costs on lower cost homes are expensive since some of the costs are not based on % and are fixed since the bank makes so little money on a 40K loan. Things like origination fees, appraisals, title search and insurance, etc will add up to 5-6K on top of your down payment.

What this does mean is that you need to improve and adapt your strategy to match your goal. Eventually your cash flow will start to snowball and help you buy more properties quicker but 2 properties at 200/m each wont be enough in the beginning. Add on top of that you want to buy perfect properties that don't need any work. You will have a hard time finding properties like this for cheap consistently. These are usually an exception and not the rule.

What I would suggest to start with is any strategy that you could put some sweat equity into to increase the value. Maybe a property that doesn't need a full rehab but a couple of thousand to make it really shine to tenants or to buyers in the future? Maybe a 2-4 unit property that you can live in 1 and rent the others and slowly improve the property to drive value? If you live in a 4 unit or less property you can get an FHA loan which would require as low as 3% down payment.

One last thing to consider is that if you find a property where you can spend some $ or sweat to improve the value, you can then refinance the property and get some cash out. This would allow you to purchase your next property quicker instead of relying on just cash flow and personal savings. I admire your drive and not allowing people to tell you that you cannot do something. But there is a balance between being driven and persistent and ignoring sound advice. There is always a way but that doesn't mean that it will work just because you want it to, so you just need to find how to do get it done. BP is an amazing resource and so is the podcast and certain books. Start reading books on investing with low or no money and it will at least give you an idea on how to get more for your dollars and how to use what you have to snow ball into the next property. Good luck with everything and I look forward to hearing that you purchased your first property.

Originally posted by @Masta Purba:
Originally posted by @Colleen F.:

Now, they are going to do this whether you agree or not.  You might have been better if you did not agree to this before March rent was paid.  A pay or quit notice would then have been done if they did not pay March rent.  I am not sure if  you were clear and specified the last month would be ok to use part of the security deposit but it is my thought they are doing what they are doing and you have to get them co-operating with what you need to do to sell the house.  Send them notice to enter for the real estate agent and then deal with the rent.  Remind them they need your good will for a reference for their next rental and you need something to work with for any issues on move out. What will cover any issues is up to you.  Is it a months rent? Is it some smaller amount?   I had a situation that fell out in a similar fashion but the tenants kept things poorly and owed damages which they did not pay.

 Thank you for your response Colleen. I held 2 months of rent as security deposits because at that time, their income was not that OK but their credit score was good.  I actually didn't agree to this before March rent was paid.  But then I discussed it with my other investor's friend and he told me that he usually only keeps 1 month rent as a security deposit. That's why I came to a decision to give the tenant their 1 month security deposit to cover their March rent and continue to keep another month rent as a security deposit. I will try to remind them that they need my reference, but unfortunately my tenant just got married and she would move with her husband, so she won't need my reference to find the next rental. Her mother would move with her. 

 That is putting a lot of liability on you if anything is significantly damaged that you just aren't seeing. Check your jurisdiction but as the person above mentioned, it might be illegal for you to use deposits towards rent but on the other hand some jurisdictions require you to return 1 deposit after a certain amount of time (1-2 years) so this might be ok. However, for the last month I would once again remind the tenant that she is required to pay and if she does not you will be billing for late fees and reporting the late payment to the credit bureau which if she has great credit she will care about. Explain that this is not about not trusting her but about following the lease and the law and that if everything is in order you will return her deposit very promptly. 

Post: Tennant divorce, wants out of lease

Igor MessanoPosted
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 177
  • Votes 64

Do not allow anyone to remove their name from the lease. It brings you no benefit and you can be getting in the middle of a legal battle with the divorce. Look at it as a breach of lease agreement and discuss alternatives as to how to break the lease, which could include you showing the property before they vacate.

Regarding the husband staying, look at it as a new tenant. Does he qualify on his own (consider the financial burden of his pending divorce)? If so then break the lease and the have him sign a new one. Being helpful during a hard time like this is both good for the condition of your property and karma, but that does not mean making irresponsible decisions that open you up for financial loss.

Help them cut the cord the best way possible and get a stable tenant.

@Linda S. Linda I love the idea and it is so much better than anything I've heard before. You are spending money on your own property and getting the benefits of the tenant feeling appreciated. Genius.

Post: Moral dilemma on raising rent

Igor MessanoPosted
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 177
  • Votes 64
Originally posted by @Nat C.:
Originally posted by @Joe Splitrock:

@Nat C. one other story you need to hear. A while back someone posted on BP that they had an older tenant in an apartment for like 10-15 years and never raised rent. Then one day the tenants children called and started demanding all sorts of updates in the apartment. The carpet, paint and appliances all needed replacing. The landlord realized they now needed to raise rent. The whole situation turned ugly. The landlord neglected to spend any money updating the property and never raised rent, thinking everything was fine. The truth is the property was dirty and run-down and by not increasing rent, there was no money to update the property. 

I would argue neglecting a property in this matter morally wrong. In addition to raising rent, you need to do property inspections and repair / replace worn goods. You are assuming the tenant is taking care of everything, which is usually not the case.

 I agree with you. The biggest challenge is I am on the other side of the world, so property inspections are impossible. I neither trust tradesmen or property managers, so I am not going to send unknown individuals there on my behalf.

For the time being I will manage the way things are until I can get back to the US.

I think you missed Joe's point. Yes you are in the other side of the world and haven't properly planned how you are going to maintain your property remotely, that does not remove your responsibility of the risk. Currently you are on the same boat as the person in the story and if you can't or wont fix the issue of not maintaining the property because you do trust anyone, then you can at least charge market or close to market rent so when something does need to be fixed you have the appropriate funds to cover it.

Maintenance does not disappear  with good tenants. Small items might be taken care of but in the end the majority of the maintenance just gets postponed and accumulates. When you do have a turn over or the tenant demands it, you will be left spending close to what you would have spent on any other tenant but now you wont have the market rent to support the expenses. you say you don't trust property management or contractors to assess your properties but you trust your tenants are performing the maintenance themselves?

Post: Brick pointing and painting

Igor MessanoPosted
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 177
  • Votes 64

@Charlie DiLisio

Thanks Charlie, I didn't know I could buy the mortar pre mixed. I took a second look yesterday and I think that it will only be a few spots in bottom 4 feet of the house which should be DIY territory. I've heard before that you dont want the mortar to be harder than the brick. Any idea if there are different mortar mixes and how to match it to the brick?

Post: Moral dilemma on raising rent

Igor MessanoPosted
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 177
  • Votes 64

I can see how raising rents and possibly losing a good tenant can bring anxiety but at the end of the day you are losing money by not asking for market rents. I would have no problem with giving a discount to great tenants but not the kind of discount they are currently getting. If you are a good landlord, then the fact that they are good tenants shouldn't keep you from raising the rents. 

Look at it from the perspective of the tenant. If you have lived there for 5-7 years without any rent increases and your good, responsive landlord finally raises the rent would you be that upset? Maybe. But then you would look around and realize that even after an $80 increase the rent is still cheaper than the market and you would have to go through the hassle of moving. What if the next landlord is terrible?

I think that you would be ok with the rent increase. If you would like send it with a letter saying how it has been great having them as tenants and while you have tried to keep the rents the same, your expenses have gone up (Maybe taxes?) and after the increase the rent will still remain significantly under market price. Add in that you would love to continue your great tenant - landlord relationship.