Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Scott Malkin

Scott Malkin has started 6 posts and replied 18 times.

Post: Do I need workers compensation Santa Monica

Scott MalkinPosted
  • San Diego, CA
  • Posts 18
  • Votes 2

Yes, I am simply paying for paint as the tenant wants to paint, I am not asking them to. Thanks. 

Post: Do I need workers compensation Santa Monica

Scott MalkinPosted
  • San Diego, CA
  • Posts 18
  • Votes 2

I have a 10 unit building in Santa Monica. No employees apart from a gardener who is self-employed. Do I need workers comp insurance? Already have apt owners insurance through State Farm as well as a commercial liability umbrella policy? Will I be covered if a plumber or handyman without their own insurance policy is injured at my building?  Or better yet, what if I reimburse one of my entitled rent control tenants to paint their apt and they 'slip and fall'....

Thanks !

Post: Santa Monica or Texas

Scott MalkinPosted
  • San Diego, CA
  • Posts 18
  • Votes 2

The goal is maximizing investment return. I have no problem with trading the ability to drive by my property(ies) for a better return. I suspect SM will have better appreciation than Texas, but that is of course speculation. That's why I'm thinking that perhaps taking some equity out and moving it to places like Texas may be the way to go. Of course the building is getting older resulting in more expenses, so that's an issue too.

Post: Santa Monica or Texas

Scott MalkinPosted
  • San Diego, CA
  • Posts 18
  • Votes 2

Should we stay or should we go now? Or both? We have a 10 unit apt building that has been in the family for decades and thus unencumbered. Located in Santa Monica with all the wonderful things that go along with such an ideal location- beaches, eternal sunshine, hipsters, rent control, deferred maintenance and high price/rent ratios.

So, should we sell the building and buy better-performing property in a growth area/ landlord friendly / high (property) tax area such as Texas (Dallas-Fort Worth, Austin, San Antonio)? Or, perhaps, do both; that is, stay in Santa Monica, pull some equity out and move it to Texas?....

Looking forward to the responses.

Hello everybody, was curious to get some general insight / varying opinions from seasoned investors about real estate investing strategies as they relate to my particular situation. (Also not opposed to very specific advice either).

Ok, for starters, let’s assume I have $100k cash to invest in real estate (ideally multi-unit properties). Let’s also assume I have adequate cash reserves beyond this as well as a good income (vague, I know, but let’s just assume I don’t walk around with a sign stating “OCCUPY! I AM THE 99%).

Also, I am not looking to spend a lot of time managing this beyond the initial research, due-diligence required, etc for initial investment(s) and further acquisitions down the road as the climate dictates (ie, real estate investing won’t be my full-time job). Furthermore, I am not necessarily looking for cash flow in the short-term (apart from, of course, having adequate cash flow to cover debt service/ property management/ repairs/ vacancy, etc, etc). Looking more towards long-term capital growth followed by high cash flow down the road (10-20 yrs or so…).

Let’s also assume property location doesn’t matter in so far as the plan is for them to be professionally managed (ie, Texas vs Vegas vs Beverly Hills doesn’t matter so much but prefer not to invest in ‘war zones’)….

Post: 3 Unit Property, ? worth buying

Scott MalkinPosted
  • San Diego, CA
  • Posts 18
  • Votes 2

Thanks for the replies, I guess i shouldn't buy it then, lol. I think I'll have to stay away from markets like San Diego with high purchase prices relative to collected rents.

So what do you guys think about a Texas duplex? Brand new duplex, $250k purchase, rents are $1275/side. Of course property taxes are much, much higher in Texas...

Post: 3 Unit Property, ? worth buying

Scott MalkinPosted
  • San Diego, CA
  • Posts 18
  • Votes 2

Thanks for all your replies. What about if one bought this property for $800k at 4.5% rate, 25% down, collecting $6000/mo rent. Using these numbers it seems to pass the '50% rule' screen. Any seasoned investors interested now?

By the way, on this particular property which has been on the market 1 week, there are currently multiple offers including at least one full price, all-cash offer.

Post: 3 Unit Property, ? worth buying

Scott MalkinPosted
  • San Diego, CA
  • Posts 18
  • Votes 2

Hello, new to this, first time posting, curious what everybody thinks about this investment:
- 3 unit property in San Diego
- current rents are 2400 +2400+1200 = 6000, sought after location, easy to rent
- purchase price $800k
- 1920's property, well-maintained/upgraded, no obvious initial work/repairs needed, has potential for historic designation/ Mills Act thereby reducing taxes
- while financials may not be ideal as solely an investment property, also considering possibility of living in one of the units for a while
- if owner-occupied I can purchase with 5% down, ~ 4.5% rate with no pmi...

Thanks, looking forward to everybody's comments!