Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Dan H.

Dan H. has started 30 posts and replied 6360 times.

Post: Should I Stay or Should I Go Now? If I Stay There Will Be Trouble

Dan H.
Posted
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
  • Posts 6,485
  • Votes 7,545
Originally posted by @Erik Nowacki:

@Dan H. I'm going to disagree with one of your statements.  You stated that the rent appreciation is related to the value appreciation.  The problem I ran into was that the rents were not keeping pace with the appreciation.  I ended up with a property that almost doubled in value between 2010 and late 2014, but the rents only increased from $700 to $850 during the same timeframe.

So, my equity exploded, but my cashflow hardly budged.  It's a good problem to have, but it was a major factor in my decision to sell and exchange out of California.

I agree with you that I could have kept that San Diego property and done well with it, without a lot of the work I've done to my Memphis property; but for me the risk of having my equity wiped out in the next downturn and the limited cashflow made it more attractive to 1031 exchange.

One really nice thing about San Diego real estate and the very low cap rates is how much you can increase the value of your property by increasing income or reducing expenses.  At my remaining San Diego property I have a lot of outdoor lights that are on from dusk to dawn.  I calculated that by replacing the incandescent bulbs with LED bulbs, I can reduce the expenses by $50/year.  As I'm wandering around replacing lightbulbs, I realized that at a 5% cap rate, I'm increasing my net worth by $1,000 per bulb!!  Not bad for 5 minutes of work...

So, I like San Diego real estate, but I don't want to put all of my eggs in that basket.  Especially since the appreciation comes and goes in spurts.

Happy investing 

Erik

 I understand what you are indicating but I indicated they are related but I did not mean that they match exactly.   There is definitely a lag on the rent appreciation compared to property value when property has been appreciating the way San Diego RE has for the last 5 years.  So what this indicates is that San Diego rents are likely to increase in the near term even if property appreciation stagnates.

I like your LED conversion (I am an anal conservationist but mellow on virtually all else) but our RE is one to 4 units so we do not have the same opportunity to increase our net worth but have different advantages.  Help the environment and increase your net worth $1K for each 5 minutes is great.

I agree San Diego appreciation has come in spurts but for the long-term it historically has gone up faster than inflation and faster than virtually all other locales.  My family and I have been through quite a few depreciation cycles but being in it for the long term means that the depreciation cycles are simply opportunities to purchase at a discount.  I find trying to time the RE market is like trying to time the stock market (not easy).  So we have purchased at highs (1992 and 2003: both depreciated nearly 20% after purchase before recovering and appreciating far past purchase price) and lows (1998 (by far our best purchase: over $100K/year in rent), 2012 (distant 2nd best purchase), 2013, 2014) but because we hold long term every purchase has been profitable. 

Good luck

Post: Looking for a CPA in San Diego CA

Dan H.
Posted
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
  • Posts 6,485
  • Votes 7,545
Originally posted by @Joe Koppel:

This is my first year investing in Real Estate, my goal is to acquire 4 in one year and I am on track to hit that. From conversations on this forum it seems pretty clear that I need a CPA for tax planning and doing my taxes at the end of the year. 

Is there anyone here that is in San Diego that can recommend a reasonably priced  good qualified CPA in San Diego?

Thanks, Joe Koppel

Expensive (and not a CPA) but sometimes you get what you pay for: Miles Lawence. I believe his rate is somewhere near $300/hour; it has been a while since I looked at his rate. He gets me good rebates without having ever getting audited. From my perspective I believe I pay the minimum taxes that I owe (i.e. he gets the legit write-offs but stays away from ones that are likely to result in an audit). As for your question in a different post on how much taxes I pay on my REI it is $0. The depreciation covers all profit after writing off all expenses.

In addition if your W2 income is below some threshold you can write off the REI depreciation against your earnings. If your income is above that threshold then the depreciation losses are banked against future REI related taxes.

A CPA or tax person can explain this better than I can.

Good luck

Post: BRRRR with positive cash flow possible in San Diego???

Dan H.
Posted
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
  • Posts 6,485
  • Votes 7,545
Originally posted by @Amit Kumar:

@Dan H. do you think we can connect sometime? I'd love to pick your brain and get better at finding these properties as well. Whenever I look (on MLS) I never see anything that I could even break even on!

Look at my just posted response on areas that I believe should cash flow.  Pick such an area near you.  If you cannot find any cash flow in that area then look at my profile.  Also you may want to look for a previous post from me that discusses list price versus actual price in my primary RE locale.   Only use closed transactions to set price. 

Hope this helps but ideally without creating greater competition in my locale. I am analyzing a recent MLS listing. If I choose not to make an offer I will post numbers if someone reminds me. It cash flows by my numbers.

Also do not too heavily discount principle pay down. I am not stating that it is as desirable as cash flow (especially for new investors that do not have large cash reserves) but I run my numbers both including it and not including it. The property with the real bad refi appraisal was about cash neutral when purchased but I purchased it because 1) I knew it was priced below market ($40k below according to appraiser but I believe over $50k below market) 2) it had forced appreciation opportunity as neither unit had been rehabbed and the property was built in late 1960s 3) with the current interest rates there was significant monthly principle pay down 4) I was fairly confident that the market was still going up (I am less confident now). My initial principle paydown (prior to the refinance) was ~$400/month. Post refinance principle pay down is ~$500/month (primarily due to the change in LTV and larger loan but the interest rate did improve slightly).

There is a lot to consider in analyzing a property and cash flow is only one criteria as my initial cash neutral property has had all of my investment money pulled out and significant profit extracted (even with a bad appraisal), has had the rent increase from $2500 to $3135 (both market and rehab increase but one unit is $200 below market so market rent is currently $3335), and, even when ~cash neutral, was increasing my net worth (not counting market appreciation) $400/month via principle paydown.  Anyone looking primary at cash flow would not have purchased this duplex.  

Hope this helps.  Good luck.  

Post: BRRRR with positive cash flow possible in San Diego???

Dan H.
Posted
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
  • Posts 6,485
  • Votes 7,545
Originally posted by @Joe LaGreca:

@Dan H. I appreciate your insight...

Where do you find your off market listings?  Networking and emails with other investors?  

Would you say that BRRRR is possible, but because of appraisers, you may not be able to pull 100% of your money back out? Typically how much are you able to pull back out in the San Diego market?

I've been passively watching real estate listings for years now.  But by no means know the market like a pro.  I also think i'm fairly conservative with my numbers to keep from getting burned.  

Are there any specific zip codes in San Diego where BRRRR is more likely to be found/done?

 My last 2 refinanced originally had pathetic appraisals (both from the same appraiser).  I appealed them both and got a $60k increase on one then the appraiser disappeared so there was never any processing on the second appraisal appeal (so it refinanced with the 2nd worse appraisal I have ever seen).  

The one with the $60k increase probably ended up ~$20k low.  The other probably was ~$60k low.  

I do a modified BRRR in that if inherited tenant is desirable I do the rehab upon tenant turn over which implies I owned the RE longer before refi than a traditional BRRR so I ended up getting more than my initial investment out of both those properties. Honestly with the second appraisal if it were not for market appreciation I am not sure I would have gotten anything out of it as the refi was at 70% LTV but initial purchase was at 75% LTV. I would like to think I got a pathetic appraiser but it is not the first time I have had a poor appraiser so there seems to be many out there. I really believe he derived his price by simply applying market appreciation to my purchase price and made the comps work to those numbers (which in this case was really bad because my appraisal at purchase showed I was purchasing $40k below value).

I think the poor appraiser is a real risk with BRRR and it appears especially high risk in San Diego.

So consider this risk in any REI plans.

As for zip codes where cash flow provides best opportunity is working class (blue collar) areas.  I Avoid welfare areas but my tenant's for the most part have occupations like truck driver, handyman, tow truck driver, butcher, etc.  they likely will never be able to purchase their own home in San Diego.  

Good luck

Post: BRRRR with positive cash flow possible in San Diego???

Dan H.
Posted
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
  • Posts 6,485
  • Votes 7,545

I see properties regularly (at least virtually every month) in San Diego that have positive cash flow with realistic cap expense numbers (I.e high and conservative). I think you need to spend time to know market rents, PITI costs (interest rates have big impact on PITI) local markets where cash flow is doable, etc.

there is also off market properties (I get slightly regular off market opportunities that cash flow including 3 the last full month that I was home (may)).    

Profitable BRRR is definitely doable in San Diego county but I will say local appraisers stink at fully valuing rehabs for the refinance (actually my view is most appraisers are lazy and not very good at setting values compared to active RE investors).

So my view is those who cannot find cash flow properties may need to do more research and that it is not that difficult.  I realize I have been doing this a while and it takes time/effort to figure things out.  

Also initial cash flow in San Diego will not be as high as lower appreciation areas like Ohio, Memphis, KC, etc.

Good luck

Post: Should I Stay or Should I Go Now? If I Stay There Will Be Trouble

Dan H.
Posted
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
  • Posts 6,485
  • Votes 7,545

swanny and I have communicated via IM.  This I believe

- he believes his RE method is optimal

- he has nothing to sell and is not intentionally deceiving anyone

However we have different investing beliefs (which he also knows)

In the last 5 years the lowest appreciation year for San Diego was 8% and the best was over 20%. The property swanny sold in 2015 if he had 75% LTV (my own goal for my LTV on my properties) he would have had at least 64% return on his initial 2015 equity on his San Diego properties without any effort.

Second after he has made the efficiency improvements and raised the rents to obtain his forced appreciation on his Ohio RE he now has a property in a historically lower appreciation area than San Diego.   To continue to achieve such appreciation he likely needs to keep exchanging properties to properties that have forced appreciation opportunities (efficiencies and/or below market rents).  Versus the San Diego properties have historical long term appreciation that is near the top in the nation whether you use 20 years to more than 50 years.  The rent appreciation typically is related to the RE appreciation.  So the San Diego return did not require finding efficiency improvements or having initial below market rents. 

So the San Diego investment is passive in comparison.  

Note as @David Faulkner points out Swanny obtained much of his investment capital from his San Diego RE appreciation 

My post is not intended to imply that Swanny cannot be successful following his path but to also point out how easy it can be to be successful investing in San Diego.  

Swanny believes his  RE investment choices are optimal while I believe my RE investment choices are correct for my goals.  Maybe we are both correct.  

Post: Adding a Second Bedroom, Increasing Sq Footage

Dan H.
Posted
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
  • Posts 6,485
  • Votes 7,545

I agree with @Anthony Ciulla that getting proper permits after completing construction is typically not easy as inspecting things to verify after completion is difficult.  I also agree that you need to ensure a safe living space.  

As for enforcement of codes and permits I find it varies significantly from community to community in San Diego county.  Poway is real strict; did you know there is rules to size of firewood stacks?   City Heights and Escondido are lenient.  I suspect that most duplex to quad in City Heights are not proper and this is common knowledge amount RE investors in city Heights.  Escondido seems to be less risk to proceed without permit than getting one as they enforce rules with a permit but seldom do any construction enforcement.  

Realize that if you go without permit you are taking on some risk.  I know quite a few investors that take this risk.  Also in your case the financial risk is low because the cost to make it an extra bedroom is low.  

So if I were you I would determine the cost to do it to all codes but suspect it will be more than you desire.  Assuming cost is greater than desired I would then determine extent of city enforcement (in poway I would suggest only smallest projects without proper permits).  If in an area like City Heights or escondido due to the fairly low risk (low cost) I would convert to a BR without doing it to permit if cost to doing it via permit was high.  I would make sure it is a safe bedroom though (good egress, good electrical, good structure). 

By the way I have a unit in Escondido that is a 2 BR with a fairly large extra room.  It cannot be easily made into a BR because you go through the room to enter a BR.  The tenant's treat the extra room as a BR and when I last rented it I set the price at the low end of the 3 BR units.  Our typical lease is max occupancy is 2*num BR +1.  So a 2 BR has max occupancy of 5.  For this unit max occupancy is set at 7 (I.e same as if it were a 3br).  My point is depending on the location of the unit the extra room may be used as a BR without you doing anything and may rent for virtually the same as if it were a BR.  This approach may also reduce your level of responsibility because you would not be renting that room as a BR (but you have moral obligation to make sure it is safe to use as a BR (I.e make sure it has good egress, safe electrical, CO detector, etc)).  

Good luck

Post: Should I Stay or Should I Go Now? If I Stay There Will Be Trouble

Dan H.
Posted
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
  • Posts 6,485
  • Votes 7,545
Originally posted by @Dustin Beam:
Originally posted by @David Faulkner:
Originally posted by @Dustin Beam:
Originally posted by @David Faulkner:
Originally posted by @Dustin Beam:
Originally posted by @Michael Swan:

hi again @Dustin Beam,

Those are single family and at the mercy of comps. Anything that is 4 units or less is considered single family. 5 units or more in one complex are true Multifamily and are valued primarily on NOI. That is a huge difference.

Swanny

I'm not sure I follow. Sure, I know that these properties could be purchased under single family loaning terms, but they can also be financed commercially. And their appraised value can be determined more than one way. In my case they were appraised using some mixture odd comps and income based. Your have to ask the appraiser how he did that.

The general buying public is apparently saying they are worth approximately 100x the monthly rent. I see that in my market regardless if it's a duplex or a 16 unit building (and higher).

But for whatever it's worth,my buildings are side by side and identical. The only thing that separates them from a true complex is property lines and a common parking lot.

All the same,I'm not arguing your point. Great things can happen with trading up, but until I come across a great deal, it's simply a bad move. If anyone in KC has a $1M property with rents being 1.5% of the purchase price and not a war zone, let me know haha :)

I'm not sure I follow either, nor am I sure that Master Swanny follows ... maybe you should ask the bank what it is worth.

Since Master Swanny has apparently left the building (guess that answers the question on if he should stay or go now), I will try to explain as best I can, with an open invitation to Master Swanny or anybody else if they'd like to discuss and correct me.

Anything 4 units or less is residential property (not single family, but residential property) ... as such, the value comes from the sales price of sold comps (same for same property type comparison, so duplex of similar size and unit mix in your case). It does not matter how you finance them, whether it is under a commercial loan or not, it is residential property and is valuated as such. This is the way a bank or any competent appraiser would value it, no other way by those groups ... you as an investor might value it based on income, and an insurance company may value it based on replacement value, but when it comes to buy, sell, or refinance transactions, the market value is determined by sold comps.

I won't get into the details of commercial property valuation, because it apparently offends Master Swanny's delicate sensibilities, but will only say that it depends upon the NOI the property produces and the market CAP rate, which is determined by sold comparable commercial properties in the same market around the same time, and yes, market CAP rates do expand and compress based on market forces outside of the investor's control, so multifamily investors are not somehow immune to market forces or comps. I extend an open invitation to anyone who would like to disagree with anything I say ... I might not agree, but I won't label them debbie downer or a troll simply for disagreeing or speaking a negative word or try to infer that they are inferior investors or human beings because they have not written a best selling book or done a BP podcast. Happy investing.

 I won't pretend to be the authority on lending,but it's my understanding that once you're in a commercial lender's office, they can evaluate the value of the property however they want since they hold the loan and don't answer to anyone but themselves.

I'm not saying I'm definitely that I'm right in that, nor am I saying that typically it's as you say. I just know that my property was evaluated both ways, under a commercial loan, all together.

Not saying you, but I often see people here say 4 or less units has traditional financing and 5 or more is commercial lending, but that's not always the case.

You are correct that commercial, portfolio, and private lenders have more leeway on who, how, how much, what kinds of property, and on what terms they can lend on ... they still tend to follow industry standard with with appraisals, though, and industry standard for residential is as stated on sold comps. So not sure to be honest with you why they would valuate the duplex based on income. My best guess is they were trying to determine market rents in order to back out your debt to income (including rental income) as part of their assessing risk on the loan more so than property value, but that is a total guess on my part. If this was a recent transaction and you have the appraiser's and/or bank's contact info still, maybe give them a call and ask ... if you find anything interesting, please do share.

For whatever it's worth, I have 4plexes, not duplexes, but I know your point still remains. But yea, I may revisit the appraisal docs to see if there was any explanation. Or hell, to if I'm mistaken all together. I'm going of memory here, and that can't always be trusted haha 

 My family and I have quite a few duplex to quads that in recent years have been refinanced a lot.  The appraisals I believe always have included a value based on the rents and a value based on comps but the value used for the property is the one from the comps.  I think they do it both ways in hopes that both valuations are consistent.  The rent valuations is not used in setting the property value.  

If anyone has an appraisal for duplex to quad that did use the rent based value I would be interested in hearing about it. 

Post: The mindset of the Cash Flow investor: LA vs Baltimore

Dan H.
Posted
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
  • Posts 6,485
  • Votes 7,545
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Originally posted by @Dan H.:

 oh you need my social security number too...? how about I just text it to you. 

Those who want to CF know where to go...

 I hope it is clear to all that you have no Balt RE which is an indication of what you really think of an outside investor investing in Balt.  

Post: The mindset of the Cash Flow investor: LA vs Baltimore

Dan H.
Posted
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
  • Posts 6,485
  • Votes 7,545
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Originally posted by @Dan H.:
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
@Dan H.:

...Basically I want to determine if you are placing your money where you indicate...

 oh yeah... nice try!

 Not sure what you mean but I suspect this means you have no Balt RE.  

But if I am mistaken I offer to post my family's San Diego property info (purchase amount, down, initial payment, initial rent, refinance cash out, current rents, current value) to compare with your posted Balt RE purchases.  I think it would be enlightening to those seriously considering Balt (I exclude those that live in Balt area as I suggest all investors start self managed local).  

 Men... you making my ear hurt... what are you crying about again? Sorry what...? Your property aint cash flowing? I told you.... just go through the analysis again, maybe you might eventually understand it.. or not

 All my San Diego properties cash flow but my point is that it is my belief that you own no Balt properties.  However, I will present you an opportunity to show your great Balt investment in an area that Balt should compare well.  You post your best cast flow property (we could even use current value versus purchased price) and I will post my best San Diego cash flow property.  I will even provide link showing it rents for the price I claim.  You could use Zillow for current value for my RE but last I checked Zillow was low by quite a bit so we can add to the zillow value and still compare.  

So here is your opportunity to show that you believe what you indicated about Balt being a good place for outsiders to invest enough to have found and purchased a good cash flowing property.  If you are not invested in Balt then it indicates what you really believe of the Balt RE opportunity. 

I suspect, like my other offers for you to post info on your Balt RE, there will not be a post of your Balt REI.