No prob J Scott . . . be sure and give us all a briefing when all is said and done, to report how the deal panned out.
I noticed one other thing when looking at the information I found in other threads. The poster who supported paying lot rent directly to the park manager referred to his "tenants", indicating that he is maybe a bit more intensive in screening buyers and managing them once they have moved in. By contrast, the fellow who didnt want to bother with the "extra responsibility" mentioned that the advantage comes from being the bank rather than being the landlord.
So we have two schools of thought: the landlord and the banker. If you are paying some of the bills for your "tenant", are you no longer merely a banker?
One other issue: if you are structuring the deal as a lease/option, wouldn't it be absolutely the right thing to pay lot rent directly to PM (at least before the option is exercised)? After all, you technically do have a tenant now. How do lease options fare against the more common "lonnie deals" in resident owned parks?
Hope i'm not taking this thread too far off topic . . .