Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Greg Weik

Greg Weik has started 8 posts and replied 218 times.

Post: Trump Policies Will Put Downward Pressure on Real Estate Rents/Prices

Greg Weik
Posted
  • Property Manager
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 230
  • Votes 297
Quote from @Scott Trench:

@Greg Weik

Your post just reminded me that I am now a pundit. D'oh!


 @Scott - just to be clear I was not trying to throw any shade your way!  Your analysis was great and I appreciated the thought you put into it.  

Post: Trump Policies Will Put Downward Pressure on Real Estate Rents/Prices

Greg Weik
Posted
  • Property Manager
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 230
  • Votes 297

My take:

No one knows. 

Pundits will continue to talk, and they will continue to have no accountability for their predictions. 

The smart money is on becoming a pundit, if you can.  Make predictions and speak assertively.  It doesn't matter how wrong you are. Your job is unassailable. 

With regards to real estate, there's no point in predicting the future. If prices go up, there will be opportunity.  If prices go down, there will be opportunity. 

Maybe 2nd to the job security of a pundit, however, is the job security of a solid property management company.  

Renters gonna rent, some percentage of renters will always be a PITA and landlords will always need our expertise. 

Post: Looking for a Real estate agent/Property management company

Greg Weik
Posted
  • Property Manager
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 230
  • Votes 297
Quote from @Jarrett Fogelman:

Hi

I recently moved to Denver and am looking for a real estate agent who also has a team in house who manages properties.

I have an amazing team back in Southern Oregon who does exactly this and they make it seamless when I am buying rental properties   

Lmk if you or someone you know does this!

Thanks!

 Hi @Jarrett Fogelman, welcome to Denver!  Do you currently own any rental properties here? 

I agree with other comments - you don't want a Real Estate Firm that claims to have a property management division.  Companies are either property management companies or not.  

It's like when someone tells me they've started 7 business.  Well, if you were good at the first one, you'd have stopped there. 

In any case, it sounds like you're looking for investor guidance more than anything.  I happen to be an investor and I own a PMC, and I'd be happy to offer some free advice on what to buy and where, if you're interested.  

The best seat in the house is the front row seat at a PMC.  We get to see what works and what doesn't. 

Best of luck. 

Post: SFH & STR Rentals in Denver Metro

Greg Weik
Posted
  • Property Manager
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 230
  • Votes 297

Hey @Ken Ormsby I always have clients interested in selling.  I had one reach out just today asking if I had anyone who might want to buy. 

I've purchased a couple of my investment properties directly from property management clients who decided to sell.  If you can get in before a property hits the market, you can often negotiate a great win-win deal for everyone. 

We deal mostly in SFRs.  Feel free to DM me and I can give you details on properties I have that are going to hit the market. 

Post: Profit Sharing Bonus for Property Mangement Staff

Greg Weik
Posted
  • Property Manager
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 230
  • Votes 297

My $.02 is that you don't want to paint with a broad brush.  Employees vary wildly with regard to performance and value to the company.  

Don't reward excellent employee A with the same bonus as sub-par employee B. 

Take your excellent team members aside and pay them a lot more than you need to.  

Try to build a company around the people, not build the people around the company. 

Post: Help finding best software for tenants rent and lease

Greg Weik
Posted
  • Property Manager
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 230
  • Votes 297

@Allison Cutlip No offense intended but "How do we create a lease" and "How do we find software to manage the property" sounds a lot like you need a property manager. 

A good property manager will help to keep you out of legal trouble and also be a much-needed buffer for your new neighbors, who could turn out to be psychos.  You probably don't want to live next door to tenants; ideally, they would just think you're also renters. 

If you insist on going it alone, my advice is to hire a real estate attorney to draft a lease with all the current legislation.  If Ohio is like most states, this is a complicated task, not best left to chance.  Good PMCs use attorneys and have strong leases. 

Best of luck, but again, I suggest hiring a professional. 

Post: Seeking Property Management Broker and Experience

Greg Weik
Posted
  • Property Manager
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 230
  • Votes 297

Hey @Stewart Thompson congrats!

My advice would be to shop for a PMC as an employer the same way you would if you were a landlord. 

There are a lot of PMCs out there, and most are not great.  Some are incredible. 

Find out who has good Google Reviews (and responds to them), find out who answers their phone, find out who has a polished and professional website, etc. 

If the PMC isn't hiring, offer to work as an intern.  Being there and in that environment is more important than trying to wedge your way into a company that might not be hiring.  Even if it's just part time, the key to figuring out how PM is done well is by being present around people who have mastery of the industry. 

Post: Thinking of changing my PM but am terrified that the process will be a nightmare

Greg Weik
Posted
  • Property Manager
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 230
  • Votes 297

Having a poor experience with a PMC prepares you with what to ask a new PMC. So that's a silver lining at least.  

We are fortunate to take on a lot of doors from local PMCs who drop the ball, and invariably, poor communication is near the top of the list for complaints.  My favorite calls are from prospective clients who have been with another company - they know what matters to them and I know a lot about how the relationship will go, based on what they've experienced with another PMC. 

Owners shop fees in the beginning, but once you're seasoned, you realize fees are usually about the same, and it's really process, procedure, culture, and communication that you're hiring. 

I would suggest making some calls. See who answers the phone.  Ask them about their process to onboard.  

4 doors is not much.  Occupied or vacant, it doesn't matter. A good company will have you fill out some easy online paperwork asking you some details about the doors, and they can get you transitioned into their system in 1-2 days, including reviewing your leases and notifying tenants about the change in management. 

You'll need to confirm the exit policy with the current PMC.  Do they require 30 days' notice?  If so, give that now and start your search.  Make sure you are clear of the contract you're in (are there any cancellation fees?) before you spend another PMCs time. 

My advice would be to ask very specific questions to identify if your pain points will truly be alleviated.  "If X happens, what would you do?"  A good PM will be able to quickly draw upon process, procedure and mechanisms in place to handle the "X" in your question. 

Good luck! 

Post: Flat Rate vs. Percentage Based Managment Fee

Greg Weik
Posted
  • Property Manager
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 230
  • Votes 297
Quote from @James Hamling:
Quote from @Greg Weik:
Quote from @James Hamling:

Yeah @Drew Sygit, I am pretty sure we started the "flat fee" thing. 

Not 100% but we were doing that pre '08', and it was based off our model not drawn from anyone else. 

You bring up some important points. We never set a flat fee rate just out of a whim, or price strategy, it's part of the operational strategy which is different, as it's all about efficiency. 

And with that, we are laser focused in 1-4 unit single family investment real estate. 

The model becomes very problematic in low quality assets, and sec8. Because those simply demand a significant level of labor inputs that makes it very hard to effect the efficiency model we invented. 

So yes, it's about knowing your business and being very specialized. 

Those who just try to copy the price model and not the operational leg, yeah they don't last long. 

That's why those who call asking can we take on there 200 unit community, were just not a right fit for each other. Too many just get $$$$'s in there eyes and take on anything and everything. 

No, know your lane and get great at it. Specialize. 

A/B class is our jam. C+ we will do but we know it's a net 0 so it's on value of relationship because odd's are we will loose $ on 3/4 of those. C, D and below, nope, not our thing. 

It drives me nut's when there is those upstart PM's who not only say but brag they "do everything/anything". Just announcing there ignorance and fast-track to insolvency. 

And I am NOT knocking those in those segments we don't do, big high 5 to those who have that as there jam, it's just not our thing. 

Hey @James Hamling, we compete with RW in Denver.  I've lost track of how many doors we've acquired from them.  They've not acquired any from RES.  I started bringing donuts for their team when I would stop by to get keys from them.

While this anecdote has more to do with client retention than acquisition, I still find it interesting.  A flat monthly rate might get more people in the door, but it is pointless if your attrition is out of control. 

RW's fee structure is interesting because it's a "look over HERE, not over THERE" approach. 

RW discovered that most clients shop with a "what are the monthly management fees" approach and not a "what are all of your revenue streams" approach.

RW competes with a very competitive flat monthly management fee but then charges a minimum of 1 full month's rent for leasing and a host of other fees.  IIRC, RW even charges hourly rate fees if a property consumes too much time. 

This is smart, and it's part of RWs success as a franchise.  I'm not knocking it, but let's call a spade a spade.  RW's monthly flat rate is offset by revenue streams where the client is not looking. 

We charge 7% but always between $100 and $200.  The $200 cap rewards the class A doors we want to manage, and the $100 minimum weeds out the doors we don't want. 

Our leasing fee is a flat $1,000, and $700 for owners with >1 door.  

I think the best model, and one I'm currently working on, would be more akin to how insurance works. Any repair (perhaps over a certain number of repairs) or time spent on a door outside of routine management is a "claim."  

Too many claims and rates go up.    

Any management fee structure (monthly fees) is simply a guess with regard to what will keep the PMC in the black in relation to the work that will be needed to manage the door. 

I agree that efficiency is a huge part of that equation, and the more efficient the PMC, the more they can stay profitable with lower fee structures.  


Yeah, so this is a bizarre one. 

Look, I get it, your "jelly" for whatever reason. Were used to that, nothing new. But if gonna try the good ole slander-marketing route, I just ask you try to keep it remotely realistic and not wildly off base. 

Were not a franchise. So, there is that ditty. 

And the whole "other revenue streams".... I have no idea what your talking about. Are you calling the FULL service for buy/sell "other revenue streams"?     Uh, sure, I guess it would be but are you inferring that's a bad thing? Or that it should be free? 

Our clients pay "a", as in singular, fee for tenant placement. 

Property management is "a", as in singular, fee for all standard property management. 

That seems rather simple to me. For PM clients, we have 1-off menu of NON standard things like doing crp's, or other NON standard thing for IF a client has a want or need for us to do such. Keyword "IF", as in if they choose to or if is even applicable or happens. 

And the whole thing of CO's #'s. There growth has been parabolic. No, I'm not in there day-2-day at all, but I am at national HQ in a Senior role so I do see there reports and #'s, there not struggling at all. Nor have I ever heard of you, ever. 

But hey, I am sure you scalp ton's of properties all the time from em and have never, ever, not once lost a singular client to em. Yup, nothing sounds odd with that at all. 

If I come off snarky, well it's because I'm urked at the hijacking this conversation for such low-brow marketing attempt, and at using wildly false info. 

Look, if wanna sling mud go for it, I have no doubt we simple humans have made mistakes and have not pleased 100% of people 100% of time. But keep it real bro. 

 @James Hamling Apologies if I struck a nerve!  That whole post was me referring to Renter's Warehouse as RW.  Sorry if I got that wrong, but I am very familiar with THAT RW. 

All good?

Also, wasn't a marketing attempt, sorry if you took it that way. 

But geez man, you went right to DEFCON1...

Post: Flat Rate vs. Percentage Based Managment Fee

Greg Weik
Posted
  • Property Manager
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 230
  • Votes 297
Quote from @James Hamling:

Yeah @Drew Sygit, I am pretty sure we started the "flat fee" thing. 

Not 100% but we were doing that pre '08', and it was based off our model not drawn from anyone else. 

You bring up some important points. We never set a flat fee rate just out of a whim, or price strategy, it's part of the operational strategy which is different, as it's all about efficiency. 

And with that, we are laser focused in 1-4 unit single family investment real estate. 

The model becomes very problematic in low quality assets, and sec8. Because those simply demand a significant level of labor inputs that makes it very hard to effect the efficiency model we invented. 

So yes, it's about knowing your business and being very specialized. 

Those who just try to copy the price model and not the operational leg, yeah they don't last long. 

That's why those who call asking can we take on there 200 unit community, were just not a right fit for each other. Too many just get $$$$'s in there eyes and take on anything and everything. 

No, know your lane and get great at it. Specialize. 

A/B class is our jam. C+ we will do but we know it's a net 0 so it's on value of relationship because odd's are we will loose $ on 3/4 of those. C, D and below, nope, not our thing. 

It drives me nut's when there is those upstart PM's who not only say but brag they "do everything/anything". Just announcing there ignorance and fast-track to insolvency. 

And I am NOT knocking those in those segments we don't do, big high 5 to those who have that as there jam, it's just not our thing. 

Hey @James Hamling, we compete with RW in Denver.  I've lost track of how many doors we've acquired from them.  They've not acquired any from RES.  I started bringing donuts for their team when I would stop by to get keys from them.

While this anecdote has more to do with client retention than acquisition, I still find it interesting.  A flat monthly rate might get more people in the door, but it is pointless if your attrition is out of control. 

RW's fee structure is interesting because it's a "look over HERE, not over THERE" approach. 

RW discovered that most clients shop with a "what are the monthly management fees" approach and not a "what are all of your revenue streams" approach.

RW competes with a very competitive flat monthly management fee but then charges a minimum of 1 full month's rent for leasing and a host of other fees.  IIRC, RW even charges hourly rate fees if a property consumes too much time. 

This is smart, and it's part of RWs success as a franchise.  I'm not knocking it, but let's call a spade a spade.  RW's monthly flat rate is offset by revenue streams where the client is not looking. 

We charge 7% but always between $100 and $200.  The $200 cap rewards the class A doors we want to manage, and the $100 minimum weeds out the doors we don't want. 

Our leasing fee is a flat $1,000, and $700 for owners with >1 door.  

I think the best model, and one I'm currently working on, would be more akin to how insurance works. Any repair (perhaps over a certain number of repairs) or time spent on a door outside of routine management is a "claim."  

Too many claims and rates go up.    

Any management fee structure (monthly fees) is simply a guess with regard to what will keep the PMC in the black in relation to the work that will be needed to manage the door. 

I agree that efficiency is a huge part of that equation, and the more efficient the PMC, the more they can stay profitable with lower fee structures.