It's a 1/1 that needs work. It is not livable. ARV is around $50k. That is the market here.
@Lynnette E. I agree the listing agent doesn't always receive the 6%. I believe she is the broker/agent so there would be no fees in this particular transaction.
@Brandon Carriere had I asked for the refund, it would be a reduction in pay because there was a reduction in services on this particular transaction, not exactly her whole paycheck.
@Anthony Dooley everything is negotiable. I can present any offer that I'd like. I did not elect to use a buyer's agent; therefore, I posed the question of asking for that portion of the commission refunded should my offer be accepted. I hope I can make a bundle, that is the goal.
@Russell Brazil that is a good point that they may have done a flat fee listing. Given that theory, the flat fee listing would have been higher (I've had REA want 10% for raw land). This would give more credence to my argument (say there was a $2,500 listing fee) that I should ask for a buyer's rebate.
@Michael T. Thank you for the input. That was the conclusion I came to: it would have amounted to a couple of hundred bucks.
I posed a question and asked for feedback (boy, did I get some feedback. No, tell me how you really feel). Again, I made the offer without a buyer's rebate request.
For homeowners (not so much investors), they suggest you never let a REA represent the seller and the buyer because of conflicting interests.
As many have pointed out, it's not uncommon for the buyer's agent to refund part of their commission. If it were a larger dollar transaction with the same set of facts, I would probably ask for the rebate.