Originally posted by @Alec McGinn:
I’m about to purchase a property where everything has been replaced in the last 4 yrs (roof, furnace, AC, siding, windows, kitchen, floors, plumbing, ect.) the previous owner did all the work himself since he is a carpenter. I know an inspection is always the smart thing to do, but I am debating on foregoing the inspection so that the deal can get done. I told the seller I want an inspection and he is totally cool with it and does not believe anything is wrong with the place since it is so new. What are your thoughts?
If he is cool and you are cool, then no problem. Do it, t's cheap. I will waived it only to give me an edge on an offer, but it's a good way out of a deal.
The last property I bought ( only have two MF, btw) , I did without the inspection contingency, it was a short sale. The owner lived there a few years before and the work done looked clean. He was a flooring guy.
I check for copper, pvc, and conduit for electrical. Look at outlet spacing and details, like lights in closets or valves used on plumbing. Then, check the roof, windows, and envelop/frame. Assume a few gremlins along the way. Create a list of everything that needs to be fixed, everything, then put a price on it and add 30%.
The home inspections are too basic, they lack good information and cost analysis, anyway. I don't think they are worth the time, but that's me. I have some experience managing and working on large - larger than expected- renovations.
I don't think I will pay for one again.
Take care,
Frank