Last week, the new bill was passed by city council to address housing affordability.
Here's a summary of the changes to existing ADU laws in Seattle.
https://www.seattle.gov/council/adu-eis
- Allowing two ADUs on one lot
» Removing the off-street parking requirement
» Allowing DADUs on lots of at least 3,200 square feet
» Removing the owner-occupancy requirement
» Requiring one year of continuous ownership to establish a second ADU
» Allowing DADUs of up to 1,000 square feet, the same size currently allowed for AADUs
» Increasing DADU height limits by 1-2 feet, with flexibility for green building strategies
» Providing flexibliity for one-story DADUs accessible to people with disabilities or limited mobility, with limitations on tree removal
» Establishing a new floor area ratio (FAR) standard that limits the maximum size of new single-family homes (2500sqft) and encourages ADUs
In the past, opportunity zones deals were not very lucrative because of the $$ requirement to double the improvement value ($200k-400k+?). By adding a detached ADU, you could double the improvement value easily if you add in cosmetic upgrades from the main part of the home.
Regardless of combining OZ with this new bill, I think its very lucrative for investors to start snagging properties with intention to build a DADU rental. Essentially, a SFH can now be a "triplex" though you will need to live in the home for 1 year+. Works only for house hackers.
Sadly, I think city council didn't thoroughly analyze the effects of this bill very well because many affordable housing advocates LOVE it. One thing I learned from this most recent economic boom is NEVER underestimate RE investors... we will take advantage of this new bill and renters aren't going to benefit much at all. It's not going to provide more affordable housing... just more opportunities for investors to make $$. This will exacerbate the net worth/affluence of renters vs home owners, the income gap, the rich vs poor, etc.
BPers, especially those in Seattle, what do you think of this new bill? Will it provide more affordable housing and will investors end up benefiting the most?