Thank you all for the input! I am not renting to the person and let them know that it was because the felony was classified as violent. (The property is in SC, so we have pretty landlord-friendly laws.) As I mentioned in the first post, I do have quite a few other folks that are interested and am looking for the one that I think will be a good tenant so that I won't have any safety concerns for myself or the other house on the property. (The unit being rented is for a cottage behind a house.) I just thought it was so interesting to have an actual bank robber apply to one of my units!
@Cathy B. - You're spot on! My screening criteria doesn't allow recent violent felonies. I agree with you and @Colleen F. and it is case by case if they felonies are over 10 years old.
@John Clark - I agree, and the timeline makes it tougher to even consider.
@Chris Seveney and @Alan F. and @David Dey I like the way you all think! ;-) hehehe
@Adam Martin - I agree with you. I will potentially be lenient on some things if they are over 10 years old, but I have a hard time when it's recent.
@JD Martin - I usually don't. It has to be quite special circumstances for me to genuinely consider it (like a long time since it happened, established credit, steady job, good income, great references, etc).
@Justin Brickman - That is probably the most succinct way of putting it! :)
@Jeff S. - I'm lucky enough to be in a state that's pretty landlord friendly. I'm not sure of protected classes as I didn't look up mug shots.
@Account Closed - She was sentenced "to 57 months’ imprisonment for Bank Robbery. She was also ordered to pay $6590 in restitution to the bank." So, I found the Bank Robbery charge and it was classified as a violent crime. I agree that it wouldn't be worth the risk for me, my property, or other folks in the front house (two houses, one parcel).
Again, I have enjoyed reading all of your responses and appreciate the input! I just thought it was such a novel instance to come across! :)