Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Elvin Luccon

Elvin Luccon has started 2 posts and replied 10 times.

Quote from @Kushal Shah:

Hi All,

I am new investor based in Bay Area CA, looking to invest in small multi-family (Duplex/Triplex). What I am noticing in the Bay Area is most small multi-family is really old construction around 70-80 years old. Do you think its worth investing in these older properties in the Bay Area from resale stand-point? Do people invest in them with particular strategies in mind (development project down the line)? 

Other question - From a rental income stand-point, its not going to cover the mortgage payment entirely since the prices are so high. Is counting on appreciation the only strategy in a market like this, or are there points of view?

Thanks in advance for taking the time to respond.

Best,

Kushal


I wonder if at this time the appreciation will outweigh the interest rates. It's been two year hopefully you made a choice back then 2 years ago when the situation is much better.

Hi. I am from Los Angeles, CA. I have not worked with anyone who does DSCR loans. Do you guys have any recommendations? There are a lot of companies when I search in google and not really sure who to go with. Thank you.

The mentoring would cost $250k with no investment on his side except his mentoring? 

The only thing that seems will work on a long-term hold is putting a higher down. There is no way to cash flow with the current price and interest, especially in areas like Los Angeles, CA. 

This sounds like a part-time to a full-time job depending on the scenario and issues. Having a full-time job on top of this would be difficult. 

Quote from @K S.:
Quote from @Adam M.:
Quote from @K S.:
Quote from @Adam M.:

Hello Elvin!

Thank you for sharing your plans to invest in a 4-unit multifamily property in Los Angeles, CA. It's great that you're taking a thoughtful approach to financing and considering the potential challenges and opportunities in the current real estate market. Here are a few points to consider:

  1. Owner-Occupied FHA Loan: Have you considered an FHA loan, especially if you plan to live in one of the units? FHA loans often require a lower down payment compared to traditional commercial loans. This could free up some capital that you might use for other investments or to strengthen your financial position.
  2. Down Payment Consideration: While putting down 50% can indeed provide positive cash flow and reduce interest costs, it's worth exploring other financing options. With a lower down payment, you may still find properties that cash flow well. This approach would allow you to preserve capital for potential future investments or unexpected expenses.

  3. Property Valuation and Equity:
    Given the high property valuation in Los Angeles, it's understandable that pulling out equity for another property might be challenging in the short term. However, keep an eye on market trends and potential opportunities for refinancing or leveraging your equity down the line.
  4. Cash Flow Strategy: It's wise to focus on positive cash flow, and your plan to eventually pay off the property using the cash flow is a solid one. Make sure to factor in all potential expenses, including property management, maintenance, and vacancies, when assessing the cash flow potential.

Ultimately, each investor's situation is unique, and your approach should align with your financial goals and risk tolerance. If possible, consulting with your real estate broker familiar with the Los Angeles market-- that could provide valuable insights tailored to your specific circumstances. Hope this is helpful!

Yup, I just typed his question into chatgpt and came out with near the same exact format and wording. I say we ban anyone who copies and pastes robot answers, cluttering up storage on servers for useless word filling loren ipsum type nonense.

It's worse than giving someone gift cards they will never use for their birthday. I'd rather get nothing.

Your plan to purchase a 4-unit multifamily property in Los Angeles and put 50% down to achieve positive cash flow and reduce long-term interest costs is a thoughtful approach. However, real estate decisions are complex and depend on various factors, so it's important to consider multiple aspects before making a decision. Here are some points to consider:

  1.  Market Conditions: As you mentioned, property valuations in Los Angeles are high. It's crucial to assess the current market conditions and trends. Research the local real estate market, considering factors such as property appreciation, rental demand, and potential changes in the area that could impact property values.
  2.  Financing: While putting 50% down is a solid strategy to reduce interest costs and increase cash flow, it's essential to consider the overall financing terms. Evaluate interest rates, loan terms, and any potential changes in the interest rate environment that could affect your financing costs.
  3.  Cash Flow Analysis: Conduct a thorough cash flow analysis, taking into account all expenses, including property taxes, insurance, maintenance, and potential vacancies. Ensure that the rental income is sufficient to cover these expenses and provide a positive cash flow.
  4. Future Equity Growth: Although you mentioned that pulling out equity in the next 3 years may not be feasible, consider the potential for equity growth in the long term. Monitor the market conditions and property values to seize opportunities if they arise.
  5. Diversification: While your goal is to pay off the property and use cash flow for the next investment, consider the benefits of diversification. Explore ways to balance your real estate portfolio and mitigate risks by exploring different property types or locations.
  6. Exit Strategy: Have a clear exit strategy in mind. Know how you plan to handle the property in the future, whether it's selling, refinancing, or leveraging the equity for additional investments.
  7. Consult Professionals: It's advisable to consult with real estate professionals, financial advisors, and possibly a real estate attorney to get a comprehensive understanding of the local market and ensure that your financial strategy aligns with your goals.

Given the unique challenges and opportunities in the Los Angeles real estate market, staying informed, conducting thorough research, and seeking professional advice will help you make an informed decision. Real estate markets can vary, so adaptability and careful consideration of your specific circumstances are crucial.


Hello K S.! Thanks for the response there. I did tidy up my message using AI but that being said, I did include prompts on FHA, down payment and the like. I am new to the forums so apologies if that is inappropriate but it seems that Elvin found it helpful? Curious as to what your thoughts are on Elvin's scenario.

Correct me if I'm wrong but real estate success in our current environment comes from one or more of 1) leverage 2) Rezoning 3) House Hacking. Therefore, 50% down does not really fit the narrative as you can just put that into the S&P 500 at a historically 9.75% interest rate compounded over 15 years and come out ahead. Comparing that to a house/multi at break even with maintenance, renovations, closing, selling costs, taxes, recapture plus what your time is worth, and you're going to lose. I did the math already against my own home bought in cash 15 years ago and even at 50% down, I still lost to the S&P 500. I'd rather have 4 condos than a 4 plex because they are usually in higher income neighborhoods as I can control where I buy condos.

I'd also rather buy a SFH of the same price as a 4 plex as the appreciation and rent can be just as good while dealing with a single roof, single kitchen, single family, single property management company etc vs 4 of everything.

One thing nobody mentioned is an old 4 plex already 30-50 years old in 30 years might not be worth any more than the land it sits on as houses need to be rebuilt. That could put you into another 30 year second mortgage into retirement.

The only exception here that I see and never hear anyone talk about is the ADU laws and zone splitting large lots. So you can buy a SFH, split, and create two duplexes or a multi with ADUs and condo them out. So rezoning and building in other words. Potential attached ADU for house hacking or the S&P 500/401k matching. But buying a 4 plex at market value? Maybe prices will keep going up and up and you like landording but Meh!

All just IMO.

This is a really good analogy. You are right, the numbers do not make sense at all and who wants to be a landlord and have to think about so many things haha. The only way it seems to get the investment worth in real estate is if someone buys rehab, holds, and sells in the future. My long-term goal is to have passive income and generational wealth. At some point in this real estate investment, something has to be paid off to cash flow. 

Quote from @Carrie Matuga:

@Elvin Luccon I'm a Californian (for now) and an OOS investor so I know the challenges of buying here with price. But there's are a host of other California (and Washington and Oregon) issues to consider: 1) Rent control. If rents are under water already, you will not be able to raise them to market rent in many cities. I believe LA is one of them that limits rent increases to 10% every year, so you will never catch up to market rent. Look into the laws. 2) eviction  - it is very hard and takes a LONG time to evict a non-paying tenant, and even then you may have to pay them a significant amount to leave. Before you make a decision, understand the laws and who they favor.


In Los Angeles most of the rent is under RSO which is a rent limit increase. From 1/1/2024-6/30/2024 it can only be increased to 4%. It will take a few years for rent to catch up that is the reason why I wanted to put a high down just so it makes it more reasonable and it can cash flow right away.

Can I ask how did you get started with OOS investing? How many properties do you currently have OOS?

Quote from @Justin Goodin:
Quote from @Ryan Ness:

This is awesome! I am looking at duplexes that would require that much down for just conventional financing. Did you have a certain plan you implemented to come across this deal? I am currently exploring networking opportunities to source deals like this!


I found this deal from a cold email.  


 What is a cold email?

Really appreciate your reply. Most 4 unit multifamily in Los Angeles area already has renters with average or below rents. Every property I looked at it seems will have a negative cash flow unless a huge down is made. I feel like it seems its better to get a head start at least one property should compensate or cash flow and bring more to the porfolio to really start in real estate in LA and build from there.

Hi. I wanted to ask if this is a smart move. 

I am just starting and I want to own a 4-unit multifamily in Los Angeles, CA. This will be an expensive purchase. I plan to put 50% down to get some positive cash flow on the property and to save long-term on the interest. The numbers will not work if I get more than 4 units with a higher interest being a commercial loan that could put me on a much risky side. At this point, because property valuation is already too high I do not foresee that I could pull out any equity for this in the next 3 years for another property. The goal is to pay this off eventually and use cash flow to save for the next property. Does this purchase sound reasonable? I feel times have changed and what worked before will not work today, especially in areas like Los Angeles. Any advice would be much appreciated.