Hello BP,
Thank you all in advance for taking the time to consider my question.
I just rented my third rental, and am preparing to file my second year's tax return of being self-employed. Finally, I will have some options available to me in the realm of traditional financing (without W2, you are required to show 2 years). I know that I would like to start refinancing my units (they are all free-and-clear), and would also like to take advantage of low rates with a conventional mortgage this year.
I am torn between whether I should refinance one of my units first so I can make a strong cash offer on another REO, or go the traditional route first. I am worried that if I do the conventional first I may disqualify myself for refinancing or vice-versa, as on paper I don't show a lot of income (the majority of my income has taken the form of equity). If I refi to purchase another rental, and can show positive cash flow after debt service, am I correct in assuming that this would actually increase what I would qualify for in terms of DTI?
I purchase distressed properties (mostly condos in South Florida; Broward County), rehab them entirely myself, and rent them. I am a broker and find my deals on the MLS where competition is pretty fierce and will probably have to purchase at a premium if offering financing on an REO with a conventional as opposed to cash if I refi out. A conventional would also likely limit the extent of distress the bank would approve to build equity. I am not considering 203k or other distressed-friendly loans, as to my understanding, they dictate that the lender should approve the contractors/subs, and I prefer to do my own rehab.
I have been looking forward to finally being able to qualify for financing since starting down this path 2 years ago, and really want to make this work. I will be interviewing some local banks next week. Should it prove helpful to anyone else in a similar situation, I will update this thread with what I learn. Many, many thanks!