Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Duane Alexander:
This can all be easily fixed by having buyers actually pay their agents commissions themselves out of pocket and lenders should allow them to finance the commission as apart of the transaction. It should no longer be baked in as apart of the sales price. There is no reason a seller should have the buyer's agent's funds come out of their proceeds, basically paying someone to negotiate against you. It's freaking silly. This way buyers can then shop buyer agents and the commission should be negotiated purely between buyers and buyer's agents which would result in zero possible collusion. Of course this makes too much sense and will never happen though.
Duane thats an interesting take on it.. that would have to track back to dodd Frank and fannie and freddie rules etc.. so it would not be the RE or MLS it would be changing lending underwriter guidelines to solve this issue.. on the flip side buyers are simply going to figure out what thier fee is and offer that much less to the seller.. unless its a hot market and competition wont allow that.
Yep it would be a major lift but I think it's necessary and probably the most common sense way to solve every issue this settlement is trying to solve. DOJ seems to be interested in this, so maybe they'd be interested in also updating Dodd frank and Fannie and Freddie rules to accommodate. Trusting the government to do something that makes sense....lol we can all have hopes and dreams.
In regards to offering sellers less, yep that's exactly what's going to happen. The problem is that with FHA and VA concession caps, good luck fitting commissions along with rate buy downs, repair costs, etc. in. Imagine the conversations between buyers agents and buyers when a buyer can't get the house that they fell in love with because the agent couldn't get their commission. More reason to just allow the buyer to roll the agreed upon commission into the loan and not make this something that is provided by seller credits.
.