Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Duane Alexander

Duane Alexander has started 18 posts and replied 244 times.

Post: HOA Foreclosure and paying off 1st mortgage

Duane AlexanderPosted
  • Investor
  • Atlanta, GA
  • Posts 253
  • Votes 238

Anyone know anything about HOA Foreclosures? I know if the previous owner is was foreclosed on had a mortgage then that mortgage survives with the property. My question is if you buy the foreclosure then sell to someone else, can you pay off the mortgage even if it's technically still in the previous owners name? How does that work? Does the previous owner need to authorize a payoff?

Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Duane Alexander:

This can all be easily fixed by having buyers actually pay their agents commissions themselves out of pocket and lenders should allow them to finance the commission as apart of the transaction. It should no longer be baked in as apart of the sales price. There is no reason a seller should have the buyer's agent's funds come out of their proceeds, basically paying someone to negotiate against you. It's freaking silly. This way buyers can then shop buyer agents and the commission should be negotiated purely between buyers and buyer's agents which would result in zero possible collusion. Of course this makes too much sense and will never happen though.


Duane thats an interesting take on it.. that would have to track back to dodd Frank and fannie and freddie rules etc.. so it would not be the RE or MLS it would be changing lending underwriter guidelines to solve this issue.. on the flip side buyers are simply going to figure out what thier fee is and offer that much less to the seller.. unless its a hot market and competition wont allow that.

Yep it would be a major lift but I think it's necessary and probably the most common sense way to solve every issue this settlement is trying to solve. DOJ seems to be interested in this, so maybe they'd be interested in also updating Dodd frank and Fannie and Freddie rules to accommodate. Trusting the government to do something that makes sense....lol we can all have hopes and dreams.

In regards to offering sellers less, yep that's exactly what's going to happen. The problem is that with FHA and VA concession caps, good luck fitting commissions along with rate buy downs, repair costs, etc. in. Imagine the conversations between buyers agents and buyers when a buyer can't get the house that they fell in love with because the agent couldn't get their commission. More reason to just allow the buyer to roll the agreed upon commission into the loan and not make this something that is provided by seller credits.
.

Quote from @James Wise:
Quote from @Carlos Ptriawan:
Quote from @Dan Mc Donald:
Quote from @Steven Zagaris:

Where does it say offering buyer agent commission in the MLS is illegal going forward?

In California we never had a "6% standard commission". In the last 18 years I've taken listings between 3-6% because it was always negotiable. I'm not really sure how this will effect us other than sellers on average paying less per listing.


Too many people are just reading the headlines. For starters, NAR has zero control over what non affiliated MLS's do. The major one in our area, for example (major metropolitan city) will still plan on requiring commissions to be posted in the MLS. NAR isn't the end all be all police for the entire real estate industry, which everyone needs to realize, although they have lots of influence. They can't make paying a buyer's commission illegal on a national scale. It's ridiculous that some people are even saying or thinking that. That would get NAR in even more legal trouble if they tried to do that. All NAR is agreeing to is to not have "affiliated NAR MLS's publish "publicly" the coop commission. Several MLS's have already stated that listing agent can simply post the coop in private remarks, in affiliated disclosures in the MLS or through the showing confirmation. Many listing agents will be doing business as usual if they want to draw the largest pool of buyers, like FHA or
VA. The settlement isn't even a done deal. It's a proposal.


 Yeah but seller can put 0.5 percent buyer agent in private remark 


 They've never not been able to do that.


 The problem is that if you advertise anywhere that you are only paying a buyer agent .5 percent, no buyers agent will show the house. This is another reason why sellers should NOT be the ones setting the buyer’s agent commission. The buyer agent’s commissions should be negotiated between the buyer and the buyer agent and buyer’s agent needs to prove their value to their client to negotiate the highest amount. This system we have now is stupid. 

This can all be easily fixed by having buyers actually pay their agents commissions themselves out of pocket and lenders should allow them to finance the commission as apart of the transaction. It should no longer be baked in as apart of the sales price. There is no reason a seller should have the buyer's agent's funds come out of their proceeds, basically paying someone to negotiate against you. It's freaking silly. This way buyers can then shop buyer agents and the commission should be negotiated purely between buyers and buyer's agents which would result in zero possible collusion. Of course this makes too much sense and will never happen though.

Post: Have your outbound cold call numbers been flagged as spam?

Duane AlexanderPosted
  • Investor
  • Atlanta, GA
  • Posts 253
  • Votes 238
Quote from @Grant Vincent:
Quote from @Duane Alexander:
Quote from @Chuks Erinne:

@Duane Alexander do you still use batch? I'm currently on roor for last 4 yrs. My VA is raving about batch and wants us to move there. Any insight?


 I like batchdialer for cold calling, but for texts/rvms I like Reireply , Marketingplex (which is basically the same as Reireply), and Launch Control

 @Duane Alexander, I've seen you advocate for batch dialer on another thread. ReiReply looks pretty awesome and it has a dialer. What do you like more about dialing via Batchdialer over REIReply? Are you saying you use both REIReply and Marketingplex at the same time? Isn't there a bunch of functionality overlap? 


 Hey Grant. I stopped using Reireply before they added the multiline dialer so I can't really give an opinion on it. I no longer cold call, but I loved the simplicity of Batch Dialer. Very intuitive and well designed compared to other popular dialers out there like Call Tools and what not. I switched from Reireply to marketing plex because my account got banned on Reireply so I decided to give Marketing Plex a shot. Now my company uses Launch Control as my texting platform to great success.

Post: Have your outbound cold call numbers been flagged as spam?

Duane AlexanderPosted
  • Investor
  • Atlanta, GA
  • Posts 253
  • Votes 238
Quote from @Chuks Erinne:

@Duane Alexander do you still use batch? I'm currently on roor for last 4 yrs. My VA is raving about batch and wants us to move there. Any insight?


 I like batchdialer for cold calling, but for texts/rvms I like Reireply , Marketingplex (which is basically the same as Reireply), and Launch Control

Post: How many leads does it take to get a wholesale deal

Duane AlexanderPosted
  • Investor
  • Atlanta, GA
  • Posts 253
  • Votes 238

Industry standard is about 50-100 leads (not prospects ie size of list) to a contract. In my business for example we texted about 35k people last month and got 163 leads and about 3 contracts out of that.

Post: Austin, TX Wholesaling using Google PPC

Duane AlexanderPosted
  • Investor
  • Atlanta, GA
  • Posts 253
  • Votes 238

I disagree with those in this thread saying to knock doors and do other forms of marketing instead of doing PPC. It's like comparing a Ford Pinto to a Ferrari in regards to marketing. PPC is one of the greatest forms of marketing when it comes to real estate. Having said that, PPC is awesome but I'd expect to have to spend a ton of money in a highly competitive market like Austin to get a good return. 

PPC in comparison to FB ads are different as well. PPC leads will be a lot hotter. People that are googling "how to sell my house fast" are going to be a lot more ready to go than people who come across your ad while perusing all the BS on Facebook. 

Post: Best lead sources for motivated sellers

Duane AlexanderPosted
  • Investor
  • Atlanta, GA
  • Posts 253
  • Votes 238

If you have 100k addresses, do not sleep on just recycling your current data. Marketing is all about timing. I know people who recycle the same 40k leads and do 5-10 deals a month.