Lot rent is $175. It is not a "named" park and is not considered commercial. However, it is on a 1-acre lot inside city limits that the city put 12 water taps to and 12 sewer taps. Its not on someone else's land or anything like that. Its very unique BUT totally legal which makes me wonder where the 7 home per acre rule came from. Ive never heard of that and this park has been in this location for 20+ years. Maybe it was grandfathered in or something. There is a huge shortage of rent homes in the area. Teachers are actually brought in seasonally from other areas for the school year and setup in temporary housing. There is nothing for rent in the area.
Belinda I am horrible with numbers and have always just rationalized out an investment property purchase in my head. The facts are this. The tenant owned homes (4 of them) pay $175 monthly for lot rent and never miss a beat with all 4 having been there for 15+ years. Out of the remaining 5 that I own....1 is an empty and needs complete rehab, 1 is a 14x60 2/bd that I get $700 for and the other 3 are the 12x40 2/bd "park models" that I own so many of where I live 30 minutes away from this park and I just installed those hoping to get $450 month.
I discount one tenant/owner $50 per month to cut all common area grass. I discount another tenant/owner $60 per month to box blade the small gravel road twice a year. That's it for property maintenance!! Taxes and insurance are $190 per month. There is really no other overhead as its all city water, sewer, and electric. No special landscaping in the park or big nice signage to keep up with. Its one of only two parks in the small town and the other one is just an rv park.
I paid $85k for the park without the three park models. I owe the bank like $60k and pay $585 month on the note so for me it has positive cash flow and is a win......right? Or am I missing something? Thanks in advance