Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Mike Franco

Mike Franco has started 41 posts and replied 547 times.

Post: Tenant asking for "New HVAC system"

Mike FrancoPosted
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 555
  • Votes 261

how old is the home?

tenants have some unrealistic expectations if they rent an old home that isn't super insulated and airtight.

Even the electric companies and DOE recommend only setting the thermostat to 78F while at home.

.

If they want cooler than that, get them a meat locker or freezer chest, and tell them to go lie in it.

Post: AB -1842 potential new rental property ?

Mike FrancoPosted
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 555
  • Votes 261

yeah that makes sense. Alienable separate from other units- describes SFRs and individual apartments.

Looks like this doesn't affect lots of investors then.

All those landlords on zillow can rest easy here in LA county.

Post: California Rent Control

Mike FrancoPosted
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 555
  • Votes 261
Originally posted by @Diane G.:

I think this new law will definitely PUSH UP market rent, because landlord will rush to go to market rent....

I personally have a SFH that I have been renting to 3 college students... Great tenants... Market rent is likely $3800 and I am at $3150, and never raised rent in the 2 years they are there...

Now I am going to raise 5% every year to get caught up with the market, so that they don't have incentive to stay there forever, since I can no longer ask them to leave....

I actually feel sorry for them....

I feel more sorry that you didn't raise the rent on them. If market rent is $3800, why do you choose to stay so far from it?

College students have financial aid and mommy and daddy, and are more than willing to pay.

.

I don't think this bill will affect the market much. Those landlords who never raise the rent, will continue not to raise rent, until their current tenant decides to move.

According to the bill, you are allowed to re-rent at market rates for new tenants.

Post: California Rent Control

Mike FrancoPosted
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 555
  • Votes 261

One solution is to get them to sign a new fixed term lease (3,6,12, even 2 month lease terms) with no automatic renewal. 

Then at the end of term, they would be required to leave, and you can jack up rents to market rate for the new tenant.

.

If I recall correctly, with a 30-60 day notice, you can even change the terms of the current m2m tenancy-at-will contract into a fixed term lease. That's another loophole not addressed.

Signing a new fixed term lease contract gives them a future move-out date, but is technically not an eviction.

You're not stuck with a below market tenant forever.

Post: California Rent Control

Mike FrancoPosted
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 555
  • Votes 261

@Thalia G.  no, that won't exempt you from rent caps.

However, as stated in the bill, you can remove tenants for no-fault just causes

    (A) (i) Intent to occupy the residential real property by the owner or their spouse, domestic partner, children, grandchildren, parents, or grandparents.


As long as your property is considered residential real property, the bill says you can move in and get rid of the tenant as a no-fault just cause.

However, according to section (d)(1), you will be responsible for their moving expenses, equivalent to one month's rent.

If you are way way below market, this could be a worthwhile solution.

There are so many loopholes with this bill, unsurprisingly. It's not ironclad. For example, it doesn't specify how long the owner and relatives must stay after moving in.

Without any guidelines, you could move back in for 1 week, and put it back up for rent, if no other law prohibits this.

Post: AB -1842 potential new rental property ?

Mike FrancoPosted
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 555
  • Votes 261

looks pretty clear to me...

The only SFRs that are exempt are owner occupied ones, and houses newer than 15 years old.

Owner must live in the house.

that would exclude absentee owners of homes built prior to 2004-2005.



(e) This section shall not apply to the following types of residential real properties or residential circumstances:

((5) Single-family owner-occupied residences, including a residence in which the owner-occupant rents or leases no more than two units or bedrooms, including, but not limited to, an accessory dwelling unit or a junior accessory dwelling unit.

Post: Tenant angry about AC

Mike FrancoPosted
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 555
  • Votes 261

ceiling fans would probably help the situation, at the cheapest cost possible.

the movement of air will make it feel cooler than it is.

Post: California Rent Control

Mike FrancoPosted
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 555
  • Votes 261
Originally posted by @Thalia G.:

@Mike Franco doesn’t work for multifamily

What doesn't work?

Post: Help tenant issue- Emotional support animals

Mike FrancoPosted
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 555
  • Votes 261

 that's probably illegal, because licenses are state specific. So a therapist in nevada is not licensed to practice or send notices across state lines into utah.

holy damn, these online factories are likely violating so many laws.

Post: Is not renting to smokers a good idea?

Mike FrancoPosted
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 555
  • Votes 261

renting to smokers deters future non-smoking tenants. That smell lingers.

so you're allowing the minority ruin your chances with the majority.

What's worse is, your security deposit probably won't be enough to cover the damage.