Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Debbie C.

Debbie C. has started 22 posts and replied 30 times.

Is it common to ask your real estate agent to be the renovation manager/architect for a newly acquired fixer upper rental property you got through him/her? If it is, then what is the typical cost of this service? And is doing it this way better than just asking for contractor recommendations?

I have a question about the 1031 exchange that I’m still confused over. Let’s say I bought a property for $200k and rented it out for many years and paid off the mortgage so it’s free and clear. Now I want to sell it and I first spend $50k doing improvement renovations before selling. Then I find someone that’ll purchase it for $500k through a 1031 and name myself a replacement property. The costs of selling (agent fees, etc.) let’s say are about $20k. It’s my understanding that my potentially taxable gain would be $230k in this case ($500k minus $200k + 50k renovation + 20k costs to sell). However, is it true that the replacement property must also be $500k (and not $230k) or above for me to avoid capital gains taxes? And if so, does that mean if I wanted to buy a replacement property with my sales proceeds in cash (avoiding any mortgages), I’d basically have to use all of the $500k I got from the sale….meaning I wouldn’t be able to pay back the money I spent on the renovation and the other miscellaneous costs involved in the sale. Is there any way at all to do renovations on the property you want to sell in a 1031 without putting yourself in more debt?

My husband and I are trying to set up a 1031 exchange for the sale of our house which is free and clear. But because we are older and nearing retirement, we want our son to use this 1031 money to continue investing in real estate for our family while my husband and I take a much needed break. From what I've read, once you start a 1031 you can't change the names. So we're wondering if we need to add his name to the deed before selling the property? Or perhaps another idea is to put it under an LLC with all our names in there? Does anyone have any recommendations? Thanks!

Originally posted by @Dave Foster:

@Debbie C., Not naive or a pipe dream.  That strategy is the holy grail!!  We've helped several clients do just that.  @Ashish Acharya spoke well to the things you need to watch out for.

1. Really convert your current primary to investment.  Go so far as to generate revenue and file tax returns with the property on your Schedule E with a depreciation schedule.  2008-16 is the safe harbor.  There are folks who just want to tax returns filed.  And others who feel comfortable with one year.  

2. When you sell and do the 1031 really buy investment property and treat it as such.  Again 2008-16 is the safe harbor of two years.   Some feel comfortable with less.  It all depends on circumstances.  But you definitely want to treat the replacement also on your schedule E.  

The mechanism that is used when you do sell after moving out and converting the property to investment is that you sell the investment property (former primary) and take $500K in boot.  This would normally be taxable but when your accountant files your return they will match the gain up with your eligibility for the 121 exclusion so the boot becomes tax free.

There's also one more huge positive that you may not have thought of - Once you've completed this process, if the replacement property you purchased happened to be a kicking beautiful property you might decide at some point down the road to convert that investment property into your primary residence!!!  The same process only in reverse.  Once you've owned the replacement for 5 years and lived in it for 2 years you can once again sell and this time you'll get to take a proration of the gain tax free. It's the gift that keeps giving!!!!

And totally legit - kudos for thinking of it.

Thank you guys, you really made my day! Who would you recommend I go to in order to start this process? A lawyer or a CPA? 

Also, I've seen people warning about depreciation recapture, but I'm not sure if I totally understand it. Is this something to be worried about in my case? 

My husband and I have lived in our home for 40 years and it's value has increased by almost $2 million over these years. We'd like to sell our house at some point in the near future because we're getting close to retirement. We're wondering if there's a way to use both the 1031 exchange AND the section 121 exclusion together when we sell our home?  The idea would be that we'd move out for a year or two and rent out the house so that it'd convert from primary residence to an investment property. Then we'd (ideally) be able to take out $500k tax-free, and the remaining $1.5 million we'd re-invest in a replacement property through 1031. Is this possible or am I being too naive? The thing I'm most unsure about is whether the IRS will let us do a 1031 exchange because we've lived in this property for 40 years and have never used it for investment purposes before. So I don't know if renting it out for a year or two would be sufficient to qualify it for 1031. Does anyone have any experience with this? Thank you.

What are the best options for taking out a loan to do a full remodel? I own this property (3 bedroom) and have already paid off the mortgage. The estimated cost of the remodel looks to be about $300-$400k. I don't know much about loans, but do you guys have recommendations for where to look, especially for a house with no mortgage? Thanks!

Does anyone have recommendations for a good home appraiser that is located in Oakland? Thanks in advance!

Originally posted by @Rhonda Wilson:

Hi Debbie,

I suggest that you get at least one second opinion. My thinking is that your best bet may be to sell the house "as is." The reason is that there are many potential buyers who simply want a good location and would be happy to tear a house down and build a home to their exact specifications. From that point-of-view, it's better that you sell as-is because you are selling a "blank slate" to the buyer rather than building something that may or may not be what buyers are looking for. 

I'm also thinking that if the location is good, that the value should be there. It is, after all, a matter of supply and demand. 

Good luck!

-Rhonda

Selling it as-is would certainly help avoid many headaches! But I just want to make sure that I'm getting the most bang for the buck. Who would you recommend that I contact that could help me get more information? My agent hasn't been very helpful so far.

Originally posted by @Nick C.:

It's tough to give advice on this one without more details. Here's what you should do:

1. get an appraisal on the property

2. get quotes for fixing the foundation and the roof, preferably from more than one company. 

3. do the math

What I mean by that is if the house is worth 500k and the repairs will cost you 50k, then you should definitely do the repairs. If the house is worth 200k and the repairs will cost you 150k then it's probably not worth it. 

My house is a 3-bedroom in the S.F. Bay Area. Similar 3-bedroom houses in good condition around my neighborhood have been selling for $1-1.5 million. How much does it normally cost to rebuild a house or do a complete renovation? Does it depend on where you are located?

Is an appraisal the "final word" in deciding what the approximate value of the home is? And do you think it's necessary to get more than one appraiser?

I've read about horror stories of people spending over budget when they try to fix something because they keep uncovering new problems, so that's why I was considering just starting from scratch. Are there any more details you need about the situation that would help?

Thank you for your advice!

Hello everyone,

I’m in a bit of a dilemma and I just joined Biggerpockets to see if someone can offer any suggestions. I had plans to sell my old house which I’ve had for almost 40 years (yes, I am a grandmother!). This house is very old (1920s) but in a very good location in the Bay Area. My real estate agent helped me with organizing inspections and they found many problems with the house, including issues with the foundation and the roof. They said I could sell the property as-is, but I probably won’t get very much for it. Or I could try to fix things, but it will be very expensive because there's lots of issues. I’m starting to wonder if I should just tear down the entire place and rebuild a new house? If the problems are as bad as they seem, I feel bad about throwing away my 40-year old investment like this, especially since the Bay Area is such a popular place to live now. But I don’t know anything about how these inspections work and how to analyze whether it’s more worth it to: 1) hire workers to try to fix the problems, 2) tear it down and rebuild, or 3) sell it as-is. Should I try to get a second opinion, or talk to other people? I don't even know where to start or who I should talk to. Hoping someone here can offer some advice. Much appreciated!