Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Dan D.

Dan D. has started 19 posts and replied 212 times.

Post: Opendoor & Offerpad; What's Their Angle?

Dan D.Posted
  • Investor
  • Shakopee, MN
  • Posts 219
  • Votes 88
Originally posted by @Casey Powers:
Originally posted by @Dan D.:

OpenDoor seems to solve a lot of issues that plague sellers.

1.  Avoids long sales process.

2.  More clarity about fees up front.

In selling, it's hard to get details on commissions from a realtor.  It's a little game because many won't outline their best commissions and fees up front.

3.  A clean-cut when selling.  (no haggling over repair costs)

They will give you a repair estimate, and you can proceed or cut bait.  With a traditional sale, you first need to update according to whichever realtor you go with.

Then you need to get an offer and choose to accept.

Then once you accept, you wait for inspection and need to then wait for buyer suggested improvements.

Then if you don't like it, you face another 14-60 days waiting for your next offer as you relist.  People who have been interested in your home now wonder what's wrong with your house that it got re-listed and move on.

On the buyers side, the ability to look at homes without an agent and without an appointment is huge.

People these days don't want to engage with a lot of people, so enabling the buyer to help themselves is a great alternative.

In a traditional sale, sellers can negotiate the repair request. You NEVER have to just take it or leave it. Most get negotiated to something agreeable to both parties.

Vs with Opendoor, you only get to take it or leave it.

This is my understanding of the processes:

Open Door.

1.  Contact them

2.  Get price

3.  Schedule inspection

4.  Get repair estimate

5.  Agree to list or not.  

6.  Sold once closing is set.

7.  End of process

Approximate total time frame maybe 2 weeks?

With an agent:

1. Contact various agents

2.  Show house to various agents

3.  Get pricing estimates on what they would list for.

4.  Try to nail down commission rates and decide on realtor

5.  Sign with realtor

6.  Deal with realtor improvements.  Paint colors, cosmetic repairs.

7.  Fix those items

8.  Get photos taken to market your house

9.  Listing posted

10.  Possible open houses.  (Leave your house for this and inconvenient showings)

11.  Wait for offer

12.  Review offer and accept

13.  Wait for inspection.  Review new asks for repairs based on inspection

14.  Negotiate repairs for that buyer.

15.  Agree to close.  Wait for closing date.

If that process doesn't go well, go back to step 10-11.  Each time that period is going to be about 2 weeks in a good scenario, but I could be wrong.

Steps 1-5 will take likely 2 weeks alone if you are interviewing multiple agents.

I don't know what the frequency is of deals falling out from offer being accepted until final inspection, (best I can find is a article stating nationally 3.9% of sales failed in 2016, up from 2.1% in 2015)  but it's a considerable pain for any seller to have to reboot that process trying to appease a single fickle buyer.  It also seems as a negotiating tactic that is becoming far more popular.

My other assumption is that OpenDoor's margins will likely only decrease as time goes forward if the market dictates the need is there.  If they are getting enough listings at their current rate, they are providing value the market deems commensurate with their pricing.

Post: Millennials aren't buying homes - good or bad?

Dan D.Posted
  • Investor
  • Shakopee, MN
  • Posts 219
  • Votes 88
Originally posted by @Alan Grobmeier:

@Dan D.  The point I was making that whatever the number/percentage is TODAY, it is bound to go up as municipalities & companies 'bail' on the promises that were made to their workers.  This will not be a problem easily solved.  If you try to 'inflate' your way out, the pensions will have little buying power.  If you just cut the pensions, the pensioner will still not have the same buying power they were promised.  I believe they will inflate it vs cutting, but that's my opinion.  

And that, of course, is BEFORE you get to the funding of 'social insecurity'.  ;-)

I don't disagree with your point, but predicting the impact of this is difficult.

Right now the best guess you or I have in regards to the impact of this that it will be catastrophic, to negligible, to possibly an inexplicable positive consequence.

Post: Millennials aren't buying homes - good or bad?

Dan D.Posted
  • Investor
  • Shakopee, MN
  • Posts 219
  • Votes 88
Originally posted by @Alan Grobmeier:

@Dan D.  Most baby boomers were/are ill-prepared for retirement.  As a result, they stayed in the workforce longer in order to maximize social security.

Many of the younger baby boomers know they have to stay in the workforce longer as retirement ages have increased due longer life spans.

But I have witnessed, far too often, 'grandma' working at the local Wendy's/BurgerKing/McDonalds.  I don't think (in many cases) it is because she 'wants' to, but because she has to.   

Pensions have already been cut in a number of municipalities around the country.  Usually when the entity declares bankruptcy.  For MANY, these federal/state/local pensions were these workers' ONLY retirement incomes.  In many cases the workers were either not allowed or 'exempt' from social security withholding due to their pensions.  When you have hundreds of thousands of ppl (maybe millions), who are no longer capable of working, get their incomes slashed, what do you think MIGHT happen?

http://www.governing.com/gov-institute/voices/col-...

Good point you bring up about retirement pensions and social security.  How do we measure this to predict the impact?  What percentage of these retirees have mortgages to pay off yet?  What percent have tax rates that are too burdensome where they need to give up their properties?

When this happens, are they being foreclosed upon, or are they selling and taking equity to downsize?

It's a horrible situation for any baby boomer to lose their home because their pension is gone.  Is that 50%, 25%, 10%, 1%, 0.1%, of 0.0001% of baby boomers however?

Post: Millennials aren't buying homes - good or bad?

Dan D.Posted
  • Investor
  • Shakopee, MN
  • Posts 219
  • Votes 88

Keep in mind, millennials all live somewhere.

They either buy a house, rent an home, rent an apartment, or float from hotel room, to AirBNB, to hotel room, to tent.  Or maybe they buy tiny houses.  Or maybe they camp out in a forest building their own home out of leaves and lumber while curating their own espresso beans.

As a real estate investor, part of our goal should be to identify the trend, and capitalize on it. Whether that's buying SFH's in the suburbs, apartments downtown, AirBNB's on islands, or forest land in a Costa Rica that can be rented out to campers.

The financial impact of each varies, but they will live somewhere.

Also, please note that many Gen X'ers are raising Gen Z'ers.  Gen Z'ers from early reports are a very practical generation who are very self-responsible and don't spend money on things they don't need.  

If a Gen Y'er doesn't buy your house, in a few years, a market a Gen Z'ers will be there to take advantage of a good opportunity.

Post: Millennials aren't buying homes - good or bad?

Dan D.Posted
  • Investor
  • Shakopee, MN
  • Posts 219
  • Votes 88
Originally posted by @Alan Grobmeier:

Although it is true that the Millennials aren't buying homes, that is NOT where it all starts/stops.

Over the next 15 years we are going to have ZILLIONS of baby boomers exit the workforce and retire.

The problems we have are as follows:

1.  Millennials have been saddled with massive school debt, which can be as much as a house note.

2.  They are not making enough money to service this debt, let alone take on new debt.

3.  They dont invest like previous generations.  Investing is a fantasy.  So, when the baby boomer goes to sell their stock, WHO is going to buy it?  Answer:  NO ONE.  The market will, eventually, fall like a rock.

We, as a country, are in for some HUGE changes over the next 15-20 years.  Corporate pensions:  Underfunded and Under-insured.  State/Local pensions:  Underfunded due to unrealistic 'models'.  Govt pensions:  Underfunded, but they can print more money ;-).  22 TRILLION in debt, and counting higher every day.  Who is gonna pay that?  We can no longer 'inflate' out of it or we are going to look like a 3rd world country or banana republic.  Although some may say we are already there.  

As an investor, I have seen prices of RE almost double in my area since 2010.  It's not sustainable. My rents are up significantly, but I know my tenants incomes' are not up significantly.

My belief:  Recession in less than 24 months.  And it won't be good.  :-(  

I think this can be a good discussion and you are throwing a lot of things out there.  I don't know what analytics you are pulling from to create your opinions or if you are just reciting what you've read or heard elsewhere.

A couple comments about your points.

1. Millennials have been saddled with massive school debt, which can be as much as a house note.

This might be true, but to what degree?  My college debt was larger than my parents because they didn't go to college.  Also, my house debt was more because of inflation.  I also earned more in my job in 2000 than someone similar would have in 1960.  Student debt may become an epidemic on it's own, but it by itself might not be enough to cripple our society.  Many millenials may also have access to purchasing power to buy multiple houses (become landlords themselves).  If you have numbers on average debt, average incomes, average access to credit, we can further diagnose if we are in trouble.

2. They are not making enough money to service this debt, let alone take on new debt.

Do we know what percent of millenials are defaulting on their debt?  Also, the ones who are not (if there is a growing wage gap of rich and poor) do they also have the ability to purchase multiple properties?  Perhaps Gen X'ers had 1 in 20 defaulting, but 3 in 20 could afford 2 properties.  Are we now seeing millenials with 1 in 8 defaultings, but 3 in 20 who cold afford 5 properties each?  (Poor getting poorer, rich getting richer)

3. They don't invest like previous generations. Investing is a fantasy. 

Do we know this?  Again, maybe the richest 5% are investing far more any ever before?  Also, if they aren't investing, what are they doing with their money?  Just paying more in rent?  If so, are they living at home paying rent to their parents or are they paying to baby boomer landlords?  Things I don't believe they are investing in are ultra expensive cars and diamond rings.

If you have more stats to outline this, I'd be happy to discuss in more detail, but what you throw out are generalities.  From personal experience I see millennials joining the workforce making far more than I did when I started.   Part of this is due to inflation which ultimately is what keeps our nation going generation to generation.  I didn't invest in my first 5-10 years of working.

Baby boomers

One other point, with so many baby boomers leaving the workplace, who will take those higher paying jobs?  Either companies will need to take additional profits or they will pay someone else those wages.  I was expecting this massive exodus of baby boomers to start 10 years ago as baby boomers started hitting age 65.  Now, 10 years late, the youngest baby boomers are turning 60 and the ones who are retirement age have been slow to leave the workforce.

There will be an impact when the baby boomer generation fully retires and again when they pass away, but I don't know if that means despair for those of us remaining.

With the technological changes where the very core of how we work is changing (people working remote for example and less reliance on a motor vehicle), I think it's really hard to predict doom and gloom.

Yes, we will have recessions, but I doubt anything close to what compares to 2008.  If you have further details to illustrate this collision course with a terrible recession, I'd appreciate anything you can share so I can better draw a conclusion to prepare for it.

Post: Opendoor & Offerpad; What's Their Angle?

Dan D.Posted
  • Investor
  • Shakopee, MN
  • Posts 219
  • Votes 88

OpenDoor seems to solve a lot of issues that plague sellers.

1.  Avoids long sales process.

2.  More clarity about fees up front.

In selling, it's hard to get details on commissions from a realtor.  It's a little game because many won't outline their best commissions and fees up front.

3.  A clean-cut when selling.  (no haggling over repair costs)

They will give you a repair estimate, and you can proceed or cut bait.  With a traditional sale, you first need to update according to whichever realtor you go with.

Then you need to get an offer and choose to accept.

Then once you accept, you wait for inspection and need to then wait for buyer suggested improvements.

Then if you don't like it, you face another 14-60 days waiting for your next offer as you relist.  People who have been interested in your home now wonder what's wrong with your house that it got re-listed and move on.

On the buyers side, the ability to look at homes without an agent and without an appointment is huge.

People these days don't want to engage with a lot of people, so enabling the buyer to help themselves is a great alternative.

Post: Millennials aren't buying homes - good or bad?

Dan D.Posted
  • Investor
  • Shakopee, MN
  • Posts 219
  • Votes 88
Originally posted by @Alan Grobmeier:

Although it is true that the Millennials aren't buying homes, that is NOT where it all starts/stops.

Over the next 15 years we are going to have ZILLIONS of baby boomers exit the workforce and retire.

The problems we have are as follows:

1.  Millennials have been saddled with massive school debt, which can be as much as a house note.

2.  They are not making enough money to service this debt, let alone take on new debt.

3.  They dont invest like previous generations.  Investing is a fantasy.  So, when the baby boomer goes to sell their stock, WHO is going to buy it?  Answer:  NO ONE.  The market will, eventually, fall like a rock.

We, as a country, are in for some HUGE changes over the next 15-20 years.  Corporate pensions:  Underfunded and Under-insured.  State/Local pensions:  Underfunded due to unrealistic 'models'.  Govt pensions:  Underfunded, but they can print more money ;-).  22 TRILLION in debt, and counting higher every day.  Who is gonna pay that?  We can no longer 'inflate' out of it or we are going to look like a 3rd world country or banana republic.  Although some may say we are already there.  

As an investor, I have seen prices of RE almost double in my area since 2010.  It's not sustainable. My rents are up significantly, but I know my tenants incomes' are not up significantly.

My belief:  Recession in less than 24 months.  And it won't be good.  :-(  

People have been preaching about a second recession for about 8 years now.

Eventually they'll nail it.

Post: Millennials aren't buying homes - good or bad?

Dan D.Posted
  • Investor
  • Shakopee, MN
  • Posts 219
  • Votes 88

I don't believe millennials won't buy. I think they might just trend to buy later.

If population keeps growing, people will keep needing places to live whether rent or purchase.

Not to get too political, but a bigger concern is the growing divide between rich and poor, and our uncertain future around healthcare.

If those parts of people's lives become more stable, they will be more comfortable in facing decisions like purchasing a home which intimidates most people in a day when most purchases can be done with a touch of your phone screen.

Post: Newbie with Interest in Multi Family: MN & WI

Dan D.Posted
  • Investor
  • Shakopee, MN
  • Posts 219
  • Votes 88

Good luck.

It sounds scary, but keep in mind, people buy houses everyday, and they collect zero rent.  People do it constantly and decide to just live in those properties and raise families.

You already have them beat by deciding to buy something you will rent out for financial gain.

Post: Considering Brrrr in South Minneapolis from Hawaii

Dan D.Posted
  • Investor
  • Shakopee, MN
  • Posts 219
  • Votes 88

So Mpls, it will be hard to find a great deal, that's for sure.  If part of your plan isn't to differentiate in some manner (better way to rehab, better way to finance, better plan for holding, etc)., it will be hard to get something that goes by book value.

The don't bet on appreciation police will come down on this thread, but in many cases, if you're going to make money in So. Mpls, you'll have to get really good at finding a deal, or settle with the fact you might need to make some money due to appreciation or just inflation over your holding period of time.