@Michael Heisterkamp I mean his numbers here aren't insanely off the reservation, he's not accounting for any FML moments, but beyond that I just think he's organizing the acquisition and finance structure in a way that's way more risky than is needed for same-ish results, given the scenario he's running. Instead of paying $55k out of pocket to seller and some interest over 10 years, just to buy access to a seller mortgage that might become an instant pay situation, he could potentially just float an 84 month $50k personal loan (again, no math done here for contingent situations), use the $5k sweetener to cover closing costs at the title company, and just own the thing outright, with non-recourse money on the property. The month to month cashflow shrinks in this situation, and of course no reserves are mentioned for operating expenses, but from a purely acquisition oriented look, he could get started. Maybe a few years out he gets a little appreciation and some loan paydown and can get himself refi'ed in to a better situation with a proper like 10 year mortgage on the thing, but as nuts as it sounds to do what I just said, I'd still consider it a better approach than the sub-to strategy on this one particular scenario he's flushing out.