Originally posted by @Account Closed:
What is "deceptive" about making an offer on a property? If a wholesaler represents that they are a real estate agent, and they aren't or they represent that they are an appraiser and they aren't, then they clearly have broken the law. But, I don't think that is what was referenced in the discussion.
Did you know that a real agent estate agent's listing price is "an opinion"? Did you know that an appraiser's appraisal is "an opinion"? Same with the wholesaler. The wholesaler is simply saying, the propererty is worth "this much to me". Plus the seller doesn't have to pay the 6% commission fee to a real estate agent. Oh, I GET IT! You are sore about the commission. ;-) Just follow the money . . .
Classic straw man argument, misrepresent what I said and then attack the misrepresentation (I get it, its easier). I never said making an offer was deceptive. Making an offer at X while knowing that you can immediately sell the property or assign the contract for X + $20,000 without ever doing anything of value to the property is deceptive if you haven't disclosed to the seller that that is the plan. I have seen this exact situation, and not on 400-500k properties either, I've seen a property with an ARV of 100k that a wholesaler gets under contract for 50k and markets to their buyers list at 70k. So I would say that at the time of the deal, the property is worth 70k and if the wholesaler isn't disclosing to the seller that they are going to sell or assign the contract for a 20k profit, then that is deceptive.
Also, that $20,000 is FAR in excess of the 6% charged by an agent. By my calculation, that's a 40% markup. If that seller were treated honestly by the wholesaler, then I think most sellers would end up using an agent and keeping much more of their equity. Wholesalers know this and it is EXACTLY why they aren't fully honest in the first place. Oh, I GET IT! You are sore about the outrageous 40% profit for doing nothing of value. Just follow the money...