If I am the lawyer for your injured tenant, and I find out that:
1. you self manage
2. you have a significant net worth
I'm going to look at every battery and see how old it is, I'm going to check the dates on the smoke detectors, I'm going to check every bit of wiring, insulation, every little thing I can possibly find to get to you. To make you liable as the 'property manager' rather than as the 'owner'. If I can say you were a negligent property manager - then I'm getting Chris's stuff and I'm getting way more for my client.
If you have a PM Company - I'll do the same thing but I'll sue the PM.
Now - if everything is done perfectly, you are good, right? but that's being protectd by 'being a perfect PM' - not by having an LLC.
Now, if they fail to get you for bad PM, then I'm not sure, can they even take the house? because 'the house harmed me' - regardless of 'fault'? I guess that's where the LLC helps - you are perfect, but as owner you are responsible for 'damage done by your property' - if the owner is the LLC, then that owner can only pay damages out of the LLC 'net worth'.
Same kind of answer here. If I'm his lawyer I'm going to try to prove that the stairs were unstable, dirty, slippery, had a bad handrail, all things that you are responsible for as a 'PM', right? So I'm going to go after Chris first and hardest. If Chris is a perfect PM and the 'house harmed the plumber' by merely 'having a floor to land on' -then I'm with you - the LLC is responsible for the 'harm' and you can only get the LLC's holdings.
So... I'd agree given these examples - the LLC provides some protection - but serving as you own PM opens you up to personal liability for any PM mistakes or oversight. So... If I ever act as my own PM, I'll have a good personal liability policy. I may also put the properties into LLC's, I'd talk to a lawyer for sure, and beat him up with these examples.
Thanks for engaging in this banter, I enjoyed it.