Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Daryn Gardner

Daryn Gardner has started 1 posts and replied 3 times.

Quote from @Joey Chalhoub:

While 97% of tax liens are redeemed, the best case for the tax lien investor is when the investor gets the property after the owner does not redeem and the investor forecloses on the property. The investor then gets the property for a few percentage points of the total property value. 

My strategy would be to target properties which are most likely of the owner NOT redeeming. Ideally, these would be vacant and abandoned properties that have not been sold in the past 5+ years. I would target high lien to value properties in class C/D areas that are owned by an LLC.

The supreme court case Tyler v. Hennepin County, No. 22-166, Slip Op. at 14 (May 25, 2023) ruled property owners can reclaim any surplus equity resulting from a tax sale. Does this completely prevent the tax lien holder of getting additional gains after foreclosing? 

It seems like this is already the case in Baltimore. Based on this article (https://www.thebaltimorebanner.com/community/housing/baltimo...) it looks like that out of 41,000 tax lien sales, 1,750 were foreclosed on. Of that 1,750 only 180 claimed surplus funds. 

I am not sure if the supreme court would mean that investors cannot claim surplus funds or if its is only the county that cannot. Isn't it unlikely that a homeowner who cant afford a 2-3k tax bill would even challenge this legally?

Would love to connect with others in the tax lien community

Other articles

https://newjerseymonitor.com/2024/02/16/new-jersey-bill-to-r...


 The Supreme Court decision means that the counties can't claim the surplus and the surplus should go to thee homeowner. 

Post: Roots in Pipes

Daryn GardnerPosted
  • Posts 3
  • Votes 1
Quote from @Will Reed:

Has any one ever had roots in pipes and solve the issue with out doing excavation. Plumbing company says its the only way to resolve the issue


 I live in Jax as well and have run into this issue as well. I haven't used this company yet but many people have stated that Lickety-split in Jax can help resolve the issue.


Post: Mobile Home Removal Services

Daryn GardnerPosted
  • Posts 3
  • Votes 1

I recently purchased a tax deed property. Does anybody have any contacts for companies that will remove a dilapidated mobile home in the Jacksonville area?