I'm not sure what one has to do with the other but here's my 2 cents on both:
1. Disclaimer -- what follows is barring a nationwide economic collapse. IF we have a nationwide economic collapse, there will be a lot more to worry about, like food rations and Venezuela-like runaway inflation.
It's been a year since I looked at houses, houses under mortgages, and delinquencies, but based on appreciation being so high, I doubt there are many people underwater enough to force a short sale or foreclosure when they could just sell at market value. Births are outpacing deaths still (thankfully we're not falling off the demographic cliff like Japan or Germany yet), and we are a growing country. All reports keep saying that we are in a nationwide housing shortage of 6-7.5 million homes. That means that demand is still outpacing supply - the recipe for higher prices. As long as property values stay up, appraisals stay up and prices stay up. When prices are higher than when you bought, there's no need to short-sell or get foreclosed on. This is a slide from a mortgage broker but it tracks what my research says:
![](https://bpimg.twic.pics/no_overlay/uploads/uploaded_images/1684429159-image.png?twic=v1/output=image/quality=55/contain=800x800)
2. The new rules that were passed were just to keep residents off the politician's backs. The 2011 State preemption law prevents cities
from “prohibiting” short-term rentals or regulating the duration or frequency of the rental.
The rules about parking and quiet hours are already the County rules, so they are a waste of words. The $400 registration fee may be seen as putting an undue burden on property owners -- if that's the case, the city would lose all rights to regulate STR. We'd have to see it challenged in court. And does anyone honestly think that a $400 registration fee is going to make someone making cash-flow sell?
The limit of 10 people per household will also probably be challenged in court. There are plenty of non-rental houses with more than 4 bedrooms, and all of those are now limited to 10 people! If I spent 2-8+ million on my 5-10-bedroom beach house, only to be told I can't host my own family, I would be livid! There will likely be selective enforcement -- only on STRs, and that will likely provoke a lawsuit that I'm not sure the city is funded for. It only takes one litigation attorney owner or a well-heeled owner to sue the city
The only way that regulations with teeth could be put into effect would be the State deciding to allow cities to have home rule again. And that would mean turning their noses up at the millions in additional tax revenue from the 6% "bed tax" on transient rentals that the STR boom has produced. I don't see that happening. Anything's possible, though. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Your other questions:
There is definitely intimidation. You see the "Homes, not Hotels" signs in every other yard. At least a few people are tracking owner information and harassing them IRL. FB groups are rampant with renters throwing fits about home affordability. I have seen this firsthand from clients sharing with me.
A lot of STR investors are from out of town. They can't always fly in to present their arguments and wouldn't due to the mob mentality at the town halls. And a business plan is no way to fight an emotional mob, anyway -- why would I care about anyone else's business plan if I'm complaining about the lack of street parking on my block?