Pricing is up... on the retail side, for sure. But dig a little on the pool side of things (Fannie and HUD sales) and you'll see prices are back around $0.55 for NPL in some cases. (They were as high as $0.75 a couple years ago). That just shows where the "deals" went, which is why making the shift to buy large pools is in one's best interest.
But this is just like any other industry when it comes to supply and demand. We have a lot more "note investors" in the retail market, so why not take advantage and sell notes for more? I totally get it.
(Note: I put note investors in quotations because some of these folks are newbies buying bad deals because of their ignorance or lack of education about the note business. Not meant to offend anyone (: ).
On the seller finance side of things, I don't know what to make of actual competition, but I don't think it's like it was back in the 80s and 90s. FNAC, who arguably is the #1 buyer of seller finance notes, purchased 1,018 notes last year. However, there were over 18,000 notes created in 2017 and I'm sure FNAC was buying stuff with more seasoning than that.
So while @Jay Hinrichs is getting 10+ solicitations per deal, someone like @Bob E. is getting zero. That doesn't paint a competitive market in my opinion.
Also, I agree that most note training out in the market focuses on "how to buy/broker seller finance notes" which by this time and maturity in the industry, should be free information, for no other reason than a lot of that training is outdated. I think the reason brokering itself is still relevant is because not everyone entering the business has capital of their own and they need a low-cost solution in how to make some money.
No harm in that.
But spending $1,500 on a direct mail campaign to get a 1% response rate and (maybe if I'm lucky) closing 1-2 deals is not my idea of fun.
The solution is not to eliminate training people how to broker, but to update it so people can be successful at it.