Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Cap rates are all about risk NOT ROI. We're looking to get the same NOI. The market is willing to pay more because there is a perceived less risk to collect in low cap markets because of market analysis.
Cap rates in one market have nothing to do with a different market. Just like a 3/2 in your market sells for $50, 000 and in my market $1, 500, 000. Cap rates are market specific.
Explain how "cap rates are all about risk NOT ROI".
Cap rates provide useful information about the opportunity costs for certain investors. An investor in an area with a higher market Cap rate is going to have a higher ROI all other things being equal.
Credit loss/ vacany risk is built into income statement projections which determine NOI-- meaning that this is built into Cap rate calculations across the board.
I would argue that the market is willing to pay more because of asymmetries, and among other things, premiums for certain qualitative geographical factors (Hawaii has a nicer climate than Cleveland Oh, for example)- not because a family in Cali is "more able to pay" than a family in Kentucky.
I just think it's so incredibly dangerous to imply that lower cap rates are somehow desirable, all things being equal. I understand the idea that high cap rates in bad neighborhoods justify the inherent risks of those areas, but, that introduces other exogenous variables independent of of mere "dollars in, dollars out" calculations. It's one thing to argue that the situation is more complex than "dollars in, dollars out", but to imply that lower cap rates are "better" is absurd. That's like arguing that a T-bill is better than a stock because it has a lower return. The goal isn't to minimize risk, alone- and, as I have suggested briefly, I don't necessarily think cap rates adequately reflect risk across markets.