there is one main reason why I differ in opinion from many posted here. It sounds great in theory to be super strict about your criteria, however, vacant properties are targets, especially in mediocre/bad neighborhoods and you call this a "C" property. I have a rental in qhat is quite frankly an F area lol and we were holding out for highly qualified applicants and in the end we had vandalism issues. Thankfully, most of it was covered by insurance but not all. So if you can be reasonably assured based on pay stubs, length of time at current job, and references from prior landlords (i don't place stock in personal references, who isn't going to give a friend a good reference) then this can be something worth considering.
In my situation, I ended up with a section 8 tenant but I had to wait for the inspection and that process. my tenant had enough money on their own for 1 months rent. I told them I would take the $1100 as security deposit and charge them a prorated daily rent fee for the first month until section 8 got in place and we would come up with a payment plan. In the end, they owe me $610 for the time they resided before section 8 kicked in. This tenant is seeking additional public assistance to pay that but has agreed to pay me $50/month extra to get caught up. Now if she struggles to do that but keeps the place in good condition, I can afford to lose this $600 as my place is being taken care of and the guaranteed nature of section 8 rent helps me tremendously.
This is the beauty and sometimes the trouble of landlording, we would love it if there were always hard and fast answers but sometimes you have to make on the spot decisions. by being picky, $1000 of damage was caused to my vacant, freshly gut renovated property. But of course, putting in the wrong tenants can also cause several 1000's of losses. Risk vs. Reward