Hello!
I have run into the following issue and I will do my best to try and keep this predicament as short and as simple as possible. Keep in mind, I am currently looking to house-hack and purchase a MFH with an FHA loan (at the moment).
Succesful and experience investors, if you were presented with the following predicament, which option would you rather pursue, property A or property B? Why?
Property A):
-Very well maintained MFH in a very good/growing area
-Very low maintenance/repair cost
-Extremely low vacancy rate
-Has the potential to make for a great rental property long term.
-High rents, aka, likely white collar/respectable tenants
-Not many of these opportunities available, so if I miss this, it may be awhile until another one presents itself
-Presents me with more time to save funds, educate myself, etc.
Issues associated with this purchase would be larger down payment, little room to add value to the home, and I would likely (considering all expenses, PMI/MIP, and mortgage) not break even or cash flow while owner occupying.
Property B):
-Older MFH
-Not nearly as expensive
-Requires work (rehab, renovations, repairs/maintenance), etc.
-Will bring on headache/stress/discouragement
-Potential for bad tenants at lower rent rates
-Not in a prime growth area
I am not opposed to this property, so please do not assume that all the negatives associated with property B are me trying to justify that property A is better. There are several pros that are associated with this property that I have come to understand:
-Great learning experience
-Has large potential to add value
-Likely has ability to cash flow (by raising rents with each addition to the home)
Please let me know your thoughts on this if you can. I am currently brainstorming and trying to develop the best cost/benefit analysis I can before making a decision. Would love to hear your (the community) thought's on the current matter!
Thanks!
Corbin