I'm in the "hire an agent camp." Even though I'm an agent myself, I have hired other agents to list and sell certain neighborhoods where I did not have the expertise and client base.
I know 6% or whatever seems like an astronomical amount of money for what a Realtor does, but if you go FSBO, a potential buyer is going to want to save that anyway..
Being on the MLS is 99% of your marketing right there. The listing will sync with all the real estate websites/search engines. Most home buyers use an agent to represent them in a purchase because generally it costs them NOTHING and do NOT want to show FSBO's because they are a pain in the you know what. Agents also have a huge incentive to sell their listings because they only get paid at closing. Good agents also generally hire a professional photographer, negotiate better, have tons of relevant contacts, and guide you from contract to close.
At least offer a 3% (or whatever is average for your area) commission to buyer's agents and state in your advertising/yard sign that your are offering that commission to the buyer's agent. At least then you may get some traction and have a professional that can handle the paperwork. Just make sure that you understand the terms of the contract.
Better yet, just hire yourself a list agent and beat them up on their side commission with the promise of "buying up" with them after you sell. Based on your post I can tell you will net more after commission with a traditional sale via listing with agent versus selling yourself. It's not just about paperwork, there are tons of angles you are not looking at here.