Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Chingju Hu

Chingju Hu has started 11 posts and replied 74 times.

Post: Is it weird to buy rental properties instead of primary residence

Chingju HuPosted
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 74
  • Votes 64
Originally posted by @Bradley De comarmond:

@Patti Rosepiler Clearwater, St.Pete and the whole west coast still has some lower prices and solid cash flow. The appreciation in Tampa and Orlando is getting out of control so if you want cash flow and aren't paying cash then the outskirts of the metropolis areas will be your best bet. Lakeland, Titusville, etc

Jacksonville is another market that is still seeing positive cash flow basically like what central Florida was 2 years ago.

Right now, I'm looking for multi families because the appreciation isn't affecting income properties as much (properties will be priced according to cap rates much of the time). 

Hope that helps! If you would like more info, connect with me and let me know.

Hi Bradley: When you say "The appreciation in Tampa and Orlando is getting out of control", do you mean the cash flow is decreasing because the house value goes up and rent to value ratio goes down?

Post: Is it weird to buy rental properties instead of primary residence

Chingju HuPosted
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 74
  • Votes 64

@Linda Weygant 7 properties is amazing!! Thanks for letting me know that I'm not alone renting!

@Sarah R. Yes, CA is so tough! your property in Memphis looks like a great deal! There are so many things you can do with the land in CA, rent out as parking lot, build a house there and rent out, or build vacation home...etc, I'm sure it'll cash flow for you somehow!!

@Steve Vaughan  Thanks for the encouraging words! I don't believe in working until 67 and live on 401k, either. Rental property is a better way to early financial independence!!

@Sean Carroll My first property is in Dallas, TX, single family home. I choose TX because it's closer to CA (if i have to fly out) and it has good job market. The property tax is very high in TX so my next one I'm looking at other states like Indiana, etc. I want to have duplex and 4plex, too, because they have very good returns. I saw some brand new 4plex in TX on some website for only 600k or so  (compared to 1 Million in CA!) but I don't have the capital and the experience yet for these type of deal, I will wait til I have more capital and after I gain more experience to do those deals, it's my dream to own a beautiful apartment complex, too! :)

Post: Is it weird to buy rental properties instead of primary residence

Chingju HuPosted
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 74
  • Votes 64

Hi all, I'm a new member here, I've been wanting to own rental properties for a while and finally, I pulled the trigger and now in the process of my first rental!! After I sign the contract, I feel like I'm getting closer to my goal of being financial independent.

Contrary to what most people do, I do not own a primary residence, I'm renting in the Bay Area, the houses here are super expensive and don't cash flow, I don't plan to buy anytime soon (or ever). Instead, my plan is to buy many rental properties out of state, in areas that cash flow. I have a day job here so I can accumulate wealth and keep buying more. If I keep buying more in the next few years to the point that total cash flow > (my expense + my rent in bay area), then that means I'm financially independent. And when I'm financially independent that means I can quit my day job, don't have to stay in the bay area, and can just pick one of my rental properties and live there. Or even travel around the world without a primary residence...

When I told my sister the plan, she thinks I'm crazy, out of my mind! because most people own a primary residence. like a lot of my friends in the Bay area, they put $200k down payment to buy a 1 Million house and pay the mortgage each month with almost all of their paycheck...... and they must be tied to a 9-to-5 job in order to pay mortgage, and at the same time, can't accumulate much wealth outside of their 1 Million house, the house also don't cash flow! they can share the house with other people to reduce bills, but that means the quality of life will suffer, and most of them already have a family and have kids, they don't want to share house with others..... and therefore I think owning an expensive primary residence doesn't make financial sense to me.

But back to what my sister says and what most people do, they think I'm crazy to take on mortgage to own out-of-state rental properties while I'm renting other people's house (paying other people's mortgage)

What do you think, biggerpockets?  Am I out of my mind? Is my plan flawed? Am I missing some important concepts? I don't want to just own 1 rental, but many many so the income is greater than all my expense, am I too naive to think this way?? I need some inputs... thank you and I've really learned so much from all of you! :)


Post: 91.4% cash yield over two years is not a dream

Chingju HuPosted
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 74
  • Votes 64

wow this is amazing! this type of deal is hard to find, definitely need to know a lot about the local job market, thanks for sharing your experience.