Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Brian C.

Brian C. has started 1 posts and replied 2 times.

Post: Screening Tenants

Brian C.Posted
  • Louisville, KY
  • Posts 2
  • Votes 0

Thanks Michelle!

So today I called this persons next employer for when they move to town and they have the position but it is awaiting a drug and background check. I have other applicants in line for this unit. Should I wait to hear back from the employer this week, accept him or reject and move to the next applicant?

Thanks the the advice.

Brian

Post: Screening Tenants

Brian C.Posted
  • Louisville, KY
  • Posts 2
  • Votes 0

BP,

I'm a fairly new landlord as I have had only 1 unit for the past 1 1/2 years and just acquired my 2nd unit about a month ago. I'm going through the screening process right now and I do not know how far back I should go on someones background check. How far back do you all go?

Also, if someone is moving to town and has a new job they are starting when they come how do you all do their employment history?

I did see the screening process on this site. I do browse this site frequently but have not seen a post like this yet. Sorry if this is a duplicate.

Thanks,

Brian