Julia,
I will answer each point in your last reply text, so I cut/pasted it below:
"By another agent who had some experience i was told in Texas title company takes care for the lawyer part in the transaction for around 500$ to set up the mortgage part."
As mentioned previously, this depends on the deal. If Texas Title Co will handle a contract-for-deed transaction, they will most certainly handle a private financing transaction. The fact there is no mortgage removes the mortgagor/deed of trust related risk for sure. The fee of $500 mentioned clearly does not include Title Insurance, which your buyer, if represented by a buyer's agent, or their own attorney, will require in the case of title passing. As well, I question any title company who closes one of these and who also does not impose title insurance for both parties. Again, think in terms of "arms-length" and protecting the buyer from themselves, because if anything goes south, the buyer's attorney will focus on all the things you, as a licensed professional, should have done, but didn't.
A possible foreclosure would be around 2000 to 3000 $. I was surprised how affordable this is.
Yes, perhaps for the legal portion of the transaction and assuming the defaulting borrower doesn't declare a BK. If the borrower is allowed by law to remain in the property for a certain time period during the foreclosure, or if this time period is placed in limbo because of a BK, then you should add the lost payment revenue to that estimate. In Colorado, for example, the duration for a public trustee foreclosure, is a minimum of 115 days. Then, add another 5 days for each junior lien holder. Is it possible that your [then] defaulting borrower could have liens the amount to more than just your private mortgage? Sure, which BTW, extends a whole bunch less confidence in the private mortgage methodology!
He recommended a 20.000 to 30.000$ downpayment and a 8% interest rate.
Sure, if you can get it. As mentioned before, more is better. Same with the note rate of interest. While 8% is nearly twice the current, 30 yr fixed rate (assuming the borrower has the scores and the ratios), the typical rate for one of these is probably closer to going rate + 1.5%-2%. I believe these deals need to appear to be reasonable to a judge if you ever find yourself in court defending your position, but that's just me. This also means that your buyer/borrower needs to sit down with a license mortgage broker to learn what it will take to qualify for a new mortgage at the end of whatever contract period you mutually agree to. Depending on the borrower, it also means they need to sign up for and attend whatever credit counseling is stipulated in the State of Texas for such borrowers. This is discussed and required by the Dodd-Frank Act, or as currently stipulated. Confer and confirm this with a mortgage broker who is knowledgeable about private financing.
He said if buyers default foreclosure would be done after 60 days usually (delinquincy notice).
If that is what the Texas foreclosure statute states, then great! As mentioned above, it takes a whole lot longer in Colorado and, this is further modified by the borrower filing a BK.
He said to raise the sales price from 185.000$ to 200.000$.
As with down payment, or rate of interest, etc., sure, if you can get it. If you impose on your buyer/borrower to obtain their own fair market appraisal (and, you absolutely should) and they still choose to go forward knowing what the property is worth (according to that appraiser), you are covered, when/if they have issues attempting to refinance out of the way of your balloon payment.
He said in Texas title gets transferred, what probably means i have to pay sales taxes right away, right? I would prefer title to not get transferred, should i do a option to buy in this case?
In Colorado, I can do private financing, which might be via private mortgage, wrap-around mortgage, land contract (contract-for-deed), lease with option and probably a few others. If any of these methods are just flat outlawed in the State of Texas, then let that be part of your decision-making strategy. If you are a buyer, the best of all worlds is to have title pass, which allows the buyer to fully avail themselves of all the typical homeownership advantages, including the ability to further lien the property. If you are a seller, the best of all worlds is to keep pretty much everything as-is without the usual headaches of being a landlord. If title sits in escrow, as the case is with a Land Contract, you may retain the tax advantages, but shed yourself of the maintenance responsibilities.
Most lawyers push to have title pass, because it can represent less risk to the seller. However, a Land Contract done properly, with ALL the necessary steps and disclosures, can be very safe and very defensible. You just have to engage the services of someone who really knows how to do them.
On the subject of taxes, it depends. I have done both types in Colorado and I can say for sure that both are considered "installment sales" which means I declare any income realized as it occurs, not in one lump sum at time of close like with a conventional sales transaction for one of your listings where you represented a seller/client. Check with your CPA, who should also be knowledgeable about these specific transactions, to be sure, but I believe you will be OK in this regard.