It's always hard to be accurate when you take one sentence out of a two hour presentation. Just as an overview, We buy and sell houses in Southern California; about 150 a year. We usually have 50 at any one time. Usually the 50 are split evenly with 1/3 being under repair, 1/3 being available, 1/3 in a sale escrow.
Gradually since the spring of this year, the middle catagory has shrunk. The middle catagory, properties available, is quickly going pending and joining the pending group. We either have propertes just bought or they are in escrow.
Then, we began to see so many offers that the winning bidder was considerably over what an appraisal could come in at. So, we added a clause to some of our listing saying the appraisal would no longer determine sale price. Nothing changed other than we sometimes made 100% more on a property.
What normally pushes prices coming off of a down market is construction, which creates jobs in other catagories, which attracts migration, which creates demand and the circle continues to reinforce itself.
This time, we do not have any of those factors in place and yet we have major price movement...why? That's what the presentation covers. It far to general of a statement to say it's 2004 in your area. I know my area and what I meant by that is we will experience the price movement in my area that will mimic 2004 in 2013. '
If you can watch the presentation, it will give you a pretty good idea of how that conclusion was drawn. Also for reference, we wrote a report called The California Comeback in 1997, Why Prices Will Double in the Next eight Years and in 2006 wrote The California Crash, predicting in advance the price declines and foreclosure glut.