Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Bill S.

Bill S. has started 71 posts and replied 4295 times.

Post: Looking for Colorado Contact info for Oxford House

Bill S.
ModeratorPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 4,431
  • Votes 2,901

@Richard Cain I did a google search and this is what I found. Not sure if it's what you are looking for but it's a place to start. He should answer as that appears to be his job. Not sure if the info is still correct.

Contact Oxford House of Colorado:
Taylor D. Wright
Senior Outreach Coordinator
Oxford House of Colorado
Oxford House Inc.
(303) 909-9922
[email protected]

Post: Experienced Investor Looking for Job Opportunities

Bill S.
ModeratorPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 4,431
  • Votes 2,901

@Connor Patterson welcome. Come out to some of the local meetups and I'm sure you will find folks looking for the "Swiss Army Knife" guy.

Post: Seeking Colorado Real Estate Attorney for Property Management Dispute

Bill S.
ModeratorPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 4,431
  • Votes 2,901

@Norman Dean I just saw this post. If you are still having issues you might try first a nice letter to them stating you are going to the Colorado Attorney General if they don't refund all you money within 15 days. You might reference this story or one of the many others about this company.

If that doesn't work, you should try Frascona & Joiner out of Boulder as they have lots of real estate experience. The only hook might be that the PM company might already use them as attorneys in which case, they wouldn't take your case. Shouldn't be too hard to find someone to take your case.

Post: Hello BiggerPockets! New PRO here!

Bill S.
ModeratorPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 4,431
  • Votes 2,901

@Lindsay Tucker BP has made me a lot too. Since I joined BP in 2014 (wow 10 years) My net worth has 10X. 

Post: Hello BiggerPockets! New PRO here

Bill S.
ModeratorPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 4,431
  • Votes 2,901

@Levi Wittenberg welcome. My grandfather owned a small building in Silt for a while many years ago. Small world.

Take care and happy investing.

Post: HELOC on owner occupied duplex

Bill S.
ModeratorPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 4,431
  • Votes 2,901

@Alex Clopton you need to keep calling. Not sure that an 80% LTV is available but it doesn't hurt to ask. Have you tried Canvas CU?

Post: Softening Rent Prices

Bill S.
ModeratorPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 4,431
  • Votes 2,901

@Tim Fode yes rents are softening. We are down about 5% for new lease amounts. Where we can we are increasing amenities to hold rent prices (adding washer and dryer hook ups and then renting out the washer and dryer). Adding dishwashers, adding fenced private yard space. Obviously these are property specific. Some cases we are doing light renovations such as adding new kitchen cabinets and granite countertops. Renewals we are doing small rent bumps of 3% or so. Haven't had anyone move over that amount. Lots of turn-over with folks leaving the state or buying homes though. The single family homes are seeing rent increases of 5% as folks that see buying as out of reach are wanting to rent houses which is still significantly less than buying.

Post: Are you still investing in Colorado? Restrictive new law HB 24-1098

Bill S.
ModeratorPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 4,431
  • Votes 2,901

@Calvin Graves So I disagree with the concept that the lease covers all bad/undesirable behavior that would cause a "normal" landlord to non-renew. I have had case of tenants, subtly harassing other tenants at multi-unit properties. Also dealing drugs and other criminal behavior. Unless the cops come and arrest them, you really can't write a lease to address these characters. It also makes it challenging when purchasing a property from an estate or other party that hasn't really managed the property well (didn't spend a lot of time screening the current tenants). Bad actors make it into the units. Occasionally I have made a mistake and let some folks in that weren't the best neighbors to the other folks at the property. In our current litigious society it is difficult to get previous landlords (especially big box LL) to give an honest response about the quality of people applying to my units. Based on what I have observed, I do a thorough screening, and still I have had one or two slip through the cracks over the years. Not being able to send them packing at the end of the term is going to make things more challenging not to mention making life miserable to the quality tenants living next to these less than desirable characters.

The law was billed as reducing unnecessary evictions (those without cause). In reality, only a very small portion of evictions (<1%) were without cause (98% were for not paying rent and 2% for violating the lease). It is my humble opinion that the legislator who wrote the law (he represents tenants exclusively), was building a business for himself and trying to create an industry for attorney's to represent tenants. In order to do this, the law has to become complicated and convoluted. 

Post: Are you still investing in Colorado? Restrictive new law HB 24-1098

Bill S.
ModeratorPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 4,431
  • Votes 2,901

@Dee D. You really need to understand the law. As I understand it, HB24-1098 changes the procedures for evictions and creates many more procedural hurdles but I would not say it "restricts a landlords ability to evict non-paying tenants". What the law does do is create tenants in perpetuity which means I can't decide I don't want to continue to rent to a tenant who has lived in the property for over 12 months and tell them to move at the end of their lease. Now I must have a cause to end the lease and that cause must be an evictable violation of the lease or one of the few exceptions stated above. This completely changes the nature of the property rights. I no longer am intitled to the return of my own real property at the end of a residential lease. The tenant can stay as long as they want. This is most restrictive when purchasing a property with legacy tenants from slum lords. In many cases, the old tenant base doesn't fit with the new plan for the property (ie upkeep, cleanliness, and respecting the rights of others). In the past, it was simple to say, "time to move on" to these legacy tenants. Now, they have to violate the lease and we then have to evict them. Lots more brain damage and more evictions which is what the stated purpose of the bill was to avoid.

I would say that SB24-094 has far more impact to the operations of many landlords in Colorado. Most of the details will have to be ironed out in the courts. Again in direct opposition to the stated purpose of "helping" tenants. The attorney's I follow stated that this bill impacts landlords in Colorado in that they are no longer required to uphold a standard of "warranty of habitability" but are now required to "guarantee housing" to those folks renting from them.

Long answer. I am still investing in long term rentals in Colorado. I am of the scale that I can probably deal with these issues by throwing money at the various problems that will arise. I am not sure I would have survived or even started investing being a small time landlord if these laws had been in place when I started investing.

Post: First Fix & Flip - Need some advise.

Bill S.
ModeratorPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 4,431
  • Votes 2,901

@Elizabeth Naranjo There is no easy way out. Most areas require a permit to do as little work as installing 1/2 a sheet of drywall. Certainly replacing a furnace and/or a water heater would require a permit as well as running a new or replacing a duct run. Adding a new outlet, circuit and pretty much doing anything electrical aside from replacing a fixture or replacing the receptacles or switches requires an electrical permit. For plumbing, any new piping (even replacing existing pipe with new) would require a permit. Moving a gas appliance (range, or furnace) would require a permit. Some areas require permits for windows and some do not. Replacing a roof would require permits and sometimes replacing or installing new siding requires permits. 

Usually plan on permits unless it's a paint and carpet rehab. 

I think you may be over estimating the time required to obtain permits. Most permits for single family residential rehab type work is done over the counter. The exception being if you are changing the floor plan which may mean you need architect drawings. If you are changing the location of fixtures they may require a plumbing plan as well. It really depends on the scope of work and the person inspecting the work as well as the one issuing the permit.

Find someone who knows the permitting system in the municipality where your project is located and have them review the scope, and the work done and see what they think it would take to pull permits after the fact. What I'm saying is you might be over estimating the time and difficulty of getting the project completed with permits. If the work was done properly, it may not be too much of a problem. Fall on your sword with the municipality and tell them you were taken advantage of and want to move forward correctly now. Most are somewhat understanding and most will try to do what they can to get your project finished. As long as you don't argue with them or make them mad, you should not experience more than the usual brain damage of getting permits. Sure it will cost more and take longer but consider it the price of your education.

Other than that your option as others have point out is to find the money to finish it off the books of the hard money lender, sell it or refi it and pay off the lender and move on. I would say that about 98% of all residential rehabs in the Denver market are done without permits. Occasionally you will see listings in the MLS that state "all work done with permits" or something similar but in most cases, it's a don't ask, don't tell approach. That said, that now that the market has softened a bit, folks wanting the work permitted is probably going to be more common so it may not be a bad thing.

My final thoughts are about your hard money lender. My assumption is that this is not their first rodeo and as such, their loan documents should have covered the need for permits for partial payments on the improvement amounts. 

I think you realize now that you hired a GC that lied to you. I would have serious reservations moving forward with this person to complete your project. They should have clearly communicated to you what work required permits and that they could get those or not but the choice would be yours and that you would bear the cost implications either way. Since they did not do that, what else are they hiding from you? Sub-par work, cost over-runs, undisclosed delays and work beyond their expertise? You need to slow down and get your team on the same page with you or it will cost you more money and time in the long run.