Guys. The $100/door doesn’t mean anything...
Example 1.
$100,000 mortgage owner will let you take over payments, $1200 down to help him move, it’s worth $200k. He’s about to lose it to the bank anyway, $500/mo and it rents to a family friend month to month for $600/mo when you could get $1,000 when he moves out in a year to a new job. You’re “making” $100/door, $100k in equity, and 100% return.
Example 2
$2 million dollar house standard loan 25% down, 30 years at 4%. You’re payment is $7200 plus $1500/mo taxes, and $300/mo insurance. $9,000/mo. But the seller says he has a guy renting it mtm for $9100/mo. Now you’re $500k is making $1200/yr until he moves out, taxes or insurance go up, or anything breaks.
Example 3 (just cause I’m bored and thought of it before I hit post)
$1 million dollar 12 plex owner carries it for 10 years principle payments only. $16,200/mo plus your taxes insurance, we’ll call it $17,500. The renters are paying $1550/mo. ($18,600) In this case the cash flow is only $90/door/mo. But since you’re Income is $1450/mo per door, I think you’d still take the deal.
I think the $100/door/mo started from Brandon's days in an area where "houses" cost $40k (or a fourplex was under $200k) and there was some owner financing. I do only SFR in Vegas and my WORST house is $600/mo. A good house brings in $1000/mo. These are all 25% down standard investor loans around 3.5-4%. Some are 15 year, some are 30 year, some are paid off already from their own cash flow. But they cost $125k-$200k each. You can't compare them to $40k houses, or small-plexes or large apartment buildings. Move your loans from 5-15-30-50 years and boom you made the monthly cash flow you want to brag to people about. Shorten the loan and you can complain about how there's no cash flow as you take in more and more profits until it's paid for.