@Account Closed
The Fort Hood troop reduction actually happened well after 2012 in 2015, and didn't actually take full effect until 2017.
http://www.statesman.com/news/local-military/fort-...
http://kdhnews.com/news/local/study-no-major-impac...
2017 ironically has had some of the best real estate numbers since the Recession, with every city in the area's median price growing by at least 5% YoY.
I've been curious about the Census vacancy rate. I don't see a methodology of how it is calculated. Is it just vacant homes, or vacant homes actively advertising for lease? It is possible it is counting inventory that owners are not even trying to rent. That would somewhat explain the numbers in 2012 when many multi-families and single families were foreclosed on and therefore vacant, plus only approximately 35% of listed homes were selling, meaning there was vacant inventory just sitting with a For Sale sign in the yard. But I don't know the answer on that one.
The troop reduction concerns and trends you reference should be put in context that the area has continued to grow throughout those years in population and, especially, builder activity, which has continued nearly unabated, adding more and more inventory for both buyers and ultimately renters.
Plus, I don't understand, if vacancy really were that bad then in 2012, surely rents would have dipped as landlords competed for renters?
Anyway, anyone looking at Fort Hood - yes, turnover is going to be higher. I'd recommend a vacancy assumption of 8%. Rents haven't appreciated in forever (although home values themselves are mostly keeping up with inflation), and the area had a good 2017. I think it's worth considering for buy-and-hold types and know a couple investors who agree and have a lot of exposure to the area in SFH rentals.