Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Anthony Klemm

Anthony Klemm has started 3 posts and replied 12 times.

Post: early stage strategy comparisons

Anthony KlemmPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Posts 12
  • Votes 8
Quote from @Nicholas L.:

@Anthony Klemm

my 3rd and 4th rentals were BRRRRs. the first one did not go as planned, i overestimated the boost in ARV that i would get, and didn't get enough back out on the refi. the second went well, still 'left a little money in' as they say, but it's a great property and one of my strongest rentals.

BRRRR is tough, more difficult than advertised, definitely still a viable strategy, just not a 'cash flow' strategy.

Yeah I didn't figure it for cashflow, but more of a piecework operation for profit and redeploying ARV equity with some alternative uses for renting if desired. I still have it in the back of my mind as a way to turn sweat equity and one down payment into two.

Post: early stage strategy comparisons

Anthony KlemmPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Posts 12
  • Votes 8
Quote from @Drew Sygit:

@Anthony Klemm here's copy & paste info that hopefully answers your question(s):

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Real Estate Crash of 2008-2010 caused real estate prices to crash across the country - but didn't affect rent amounts. This caused a historically unique opportunity for investors - they could buy Class A properties and immediately cashflow when renting them out.

This couldn't last forever, and it didn't, as excited new investors drove up prices.

Eventually, Class A property values increased to the point that even increasing rents didn't allow them to cashflow upon purchase.

So, the flood of new investors switched to buying Class B properties.

COVID created a chaotic spike in both the sale & rental markets, attracting even more new real estate investors. According to CoreLogic, in December of 2023, almost 30% of home sales were to investors!

Investment also spiked in Class A Short-Term Rentals (STR) and investors started paying higher and higher prices based upon anticipated STR rental rates, that exceeded sustainability based upon Long-Term Rental rates (LTR).

Now we're seeing investors pouring money into buying Class C rentals - but, many are getting burned.

In our experience & opinion, the main determinant of property Class is not location or even property condition, those are #2 and #3. The #1 determinant is the Tenant Pool.

If you don't believe us, try putting several Class D tenants in Class A apartment buildings and watch what happens. Or try the reverse - rehab a property to Class A standards in a Class D neighborhood and try to get a Class A or B tenant to rent it.

Unfortunately, many newbie real estate investors are jumping into buying affordable Class C rentals - expecting Class A results. In our opinion, Class C tenants have FICO scores from 560 to 620 - where their chance of default/nonpayment is 15-22%. See the chart from Fair Isaac Company (FICO) below:

FICO Score

Pct of Population

Default Probability

800 or more

13.00%

1.00%

750-799

27.00%

1.00%

700-749

18.00%

4.40%

650-699

15.00%

8.90%

600-649

12.00%

15.80%

550-599

8.00%

22.50%

500-549

5.00%

28.40%

Less than 499

2.00%

41.00%

Source: Fair Isaac Company

According to this chart, investors should use corresponding vacancy+tenant-nonperformance factors of approximately 5% for Class A rentals, 10% for Class B and 20% for Class C.

To address Class C payment challenges, many industry "experts" are now selling programs to newbie investors about how Section 8 tenants are the cure. If only it was that easy. Yes, the government pays the Section 8 rent timely, but more and more tenants are having to pay a portion of their rent. Then there are the challenges with Section 8 tenants paying utilities and taking care of their rental property.

Investors should fully understand that Section 8 is not a cure-all for Class C & D tenant challenges, it's just trading one set of problems for another.

We see too many investors not doing enough research to fully understand all this and making naïve investing decisions.


 This is really insightful. It makes me wonder how investors will respond when seeing people getting burned in C/D-class. After the trend moving from A-class hype down to B-class availability, to reaching for C/D-class opportunities, I might suspect the next focus would be back into B-class with fundamentals mentioned much earlier in the thread until the market opens back up into a buyer's market, followed by the Class A grabs again.

I really appreciate you digging around for this reply. There is a lot to chew on. I'm still new to BP, but I love how everyone is really all-in with the forums so far. I can see why so many people have such large histories on the forum. It's really enjoyable.

Post: early stage strategy comparisons

Anthony KlemmPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Posts 12
  • Votes 8
Quote from @Nicholas L.:

@Anthony Klemm

i know this sounds counterintuitive but i am always happy when new investors find what you found.  if they think every property on Zillow is a 'deal' then something is wrong.

you got great advice and a ton of time invested in responses from

as he pointed out - there's basically no cash flow in long term rentals now. anywhere. not even in those supposed ATM mid-west markets.  cash flow is going to be found in tougher, niche strategies that are more like a business and less like a passive investment... and LTRs aren't all that passive sometimes either.

the benefits to LTR real estate are...  all of them together.  mortgage paydown, maybe some tax savings - consult your CPA - and hopefully long term appreciation.

i'm looking for my next BRRRR - which isn't a cash flow strategy either - and i keep getting outbid. it's a tough market. i'm trying to stay patient.

i know this reply wasn't specific to LV but hopefully it helped.  i am happy to dialogue further.  i have nothing to sell, am not an agent, am not an anything.

 Yes, @Bill B. has been exceptionally instructive! I'm impressed with how readily he was to commit to the discussion with someone who has no experience trying to find a way to reason.

I do see your point too about no cashflow markets. I've searched a few out of state markets as well to find better markets in some ways and worse in others. Nothing really screams unicorn property like @Stephen DeThample mentioned above.

I'm glad you touched on BRRRR actually though. I'm thinking now though that it may be more appropriate to attempt that a little further on down the road once my own personal risk tolerance could accept it. Still, I'm curious how you got into your first BRRRR. Was it something you started out on or was it more after a period of success with a different strategy?

Post: early stage strategy comparisons

Anthony KlemmPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Posts 12
  • Votes 8
Quote from @Drew Sygit:

@Anthony Klemm

Can’t find a rental property to cashflow?

You’re probably thinking you have to offer asking price – not true!

To determine what to offer on a rental property:

  • Determine reasonable market rent, NOT the highest!
  • Deduct NEW property taxes after you buy
  • Deduct home insurance costs
  • Deduct maintenance percentage, typically 10%
  • Deduct vacancy+tenant nonperformance percentage
    (we recommend 5% for Class A, 10% Class B, 20% Class C, good luck with Class D)
  • Deduct whatever dollar/percentage of cashflow you want

Now, what you have left over is the amount for debt service.

Enter it into a mortgage calculator, with current interest rate for an investment property, to determine your maximum mortgage amount.

Divide the mortgage amount by either 75% or 80%, depending on the required down payment percentage - this is your tentative price to offer.

If the property needs repairs, you'll want to deduct 110%-120% of the estimated repairs from this amount.

Be sure to also research the ARV and make sure it's 10-20% higher than your tentative purchase price.

As long as the ARV checks out, this is the purchase price to offer.

It is probably significantly below the asking price. Who cares? If you pay more, you won't meet your metrics and will probably have negative cashflow and/or equity.

You may have to make 10, 20 or even 100 offers to get one accepted at the price that meets your numbers.

This is what all investors did BEFORE the Great Real Estate Crash of 2008-2010.

This sounds like incredible advice. I haven't yet established an offering strategy like this, and seems like an exercise for what is available. It certainly seems like it would have really low "yes" responses, but it only takes one. I'm interested though in how that changed after the 2008 crash and why isn't it the same if it is truly not. Is this still a realistic approach? It seems that comps will more or less not care about that.

I might think that this applies to large multifamily a lot more smoothly in terms of valuation than in small multifamily.

Post: early stage strategy comparisons

Anthony KlemmPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Posts 12
  • Votes 8
Quote from @Bill B.:

Anthony, again assuming you can’t or won’t rent out rooms in your home, better known as easy money. What I am trying to say is so little of the return is based on cashflow, it shouldn’t be the deciding factor. 

Imagine you buy an average $400k property and hold it for 30 years. With ZERO cashflow, the rent exactly covers repairs, taxes, PITI etc, even 20 years from now when you've doubled the rents because you were behind at the beginning.

If you refused to buy it as a new primary, so you had to put down 20%, were unable to find a good deal and just bought at market price, didn’t hit a home run, etc…

Imagine you only average 4.7% appreciation. In 30 years your $80k downpayment has turned in to a $1.6M paid off property. A 2,000% return or 10.8% annually. After depreciation you probably got that return almost 100% tax free. Now you have 3 choices. It cashflows like crazy as is, you take out a tax free loan of $1.2M give or take, you leave it to your heirs when you die and they pay zero taxes. 

The way I think of my real estate investments when I started was the same way most people think of their 401ks or IRAs. I didn’t expect them to cashflow when I got started. In fact I got 15 year loans to pay a lot interest rate and just sent all their income in to paying them off. 

By accident the above example is close to what I experience. Between 10 & 15 years ago I purchase 5 primary homes and 5 rentals over 5 years. I could have put less down on the primaries but I put down 20% to avoid PMI. So the average home was $100-$110k, I put down $20-22k, and 10-15 years later they are worth $420-$600k and they are paid off. The throw off about $200k year in cashflow and I pay almost zero taxes. (Being in NV helps.). They worked exactly how your retirement accounts are supposed to work but 3 x faster.

You can say houses are much more expensive today! And my reply would be: That means you need less houses to get the exact same results I got in raw dollars. But I’d suggest with inflation eating at your returns I’d still try to get 10, even if it takes longer. It’s not a race. 

When I was young I feared the day I would start pulling funds out of my IRA and/or Roth. Was I supposed to hope I died before I ran out of money? The Alabama song "I'm in a hurry" would play in my head.

Unless you truly believe interest rates and prices will be lower in the next 2-3 years there’s no way to catch up with the investor that starts today. I was going to type “don't take uncomfortable risks.” But you will be taking them. Don’t take extreme risks. This was being done by amateurs without mentors, BP, a decent Internet forum, anyone to ask for advice, or heck, without knowing anyone that owned more than one house. You can always regret not starting 5 years ago, until you start. I truly meant it when I said good luck. Your success is a compliment to those who succeeded before you. Not a detraction. 

Why else would so meany people be trying to help you for free? We’re not trying to sell you anything and we don’t make $1 more than if you never get started. We’re simply cheerleaders, fellow players, and coaches trying to get the new players to live up to their potential. 

Ps. After I posted this. I randomly got an email from @Eric Fernwood that showed how a negative cashflow rental could provide a 19-20% annual IRR return even after selling costs because of the increased rents and appreciation. He is MUCH better at math than me. You could reach out to him to ask for a copy of his results.


 So, I wrote out a monstrous reply, and before submitting it, I re-read the quoted reply above. I think we are more on the same page than not. Earlier in the thread, it appeared to me that some of my underlying reasoning wasn't either being addressed or was told it was just completely wrong (simply from the total response in the thread), kind of throwing me into a state of cognitive dissonance.

I am actually completely okay with NOI covering costs. If I see 5 dollars a month in positive cashflow above that, I would be ecstatic. If I had to pay 1000 per month as a live-in owner-operator, I would be fine with it too. What was killing me was that I thought I was being told that preparing for vacancy/management/maintenance/repairs/etc. was so much less important than appreciation, that I shouldn't concern myself with cashflow at all and just pay whatever price with total disregard for carrying a mortgage for 30 years and concern myself with only the mortgage PITI. I'm not trying to become wealthy off of cashflow covering vacancy/maintenance/management/etc. costs by 100. I'm trying to become wealthy from appreciation. But I need to last long enough to taste appreciation. I need to be able to sustain it.

Also, I was somewhat more concerned about the overall strategy to pursue given my assumptions about the market rather than simply the importance of appreciation which I do understand. Maybe I failed to give enough insight to what I currently have in mind for anyone to properly respond to that concern.

Would you mind if I sent you a message and maybe tried to have a phone call some day? I'd really like to discuss things like this further sometime. I'm sure you have success in the very thing that is challenging me to think differently right now. Maybe it would help me more to discuss in real time. Do you currently operate in Las Vegas?

Post: early stage strategy comparisons

Anthony KlemmPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Posts 12
  • Votes 8

My main complaint wasn't necessarily that investors made 200-400k. Good for them. I'm not even sure I would classify anything I posted as a complaint. That information was stated to establish what I thought is a relevant trend to the discussion that inevitably follows it. I suppose you could say I was complaining that the barrier to entry feels higher than it should be, but your reponse didn't necessarily touch on that.

As for the cashflow points you made, sure I could just not care about cashflow in lieu of the equity and appreciation over the years, but the idea that an HVAC replacement negating any cashflow made is kinda my point about the conditions of the market. If I don't care about cashflow and just go negative every month, then HVAC repair anyway, I would be in an even worse position. It is why postive cashflow is important.

More to the point on cashflow, I'm saying that properties that cashflow only enough to pay for the PITI payment don't sound like strong investments (for me at this moment**) if what it would require is substantial cash reserves (which I dont have because im just getting in). So...in order to access the equity built up to replace a roof or whatever would require a cashout refi which sounds pretty bad if that is what I must plan on from the beginning. Sure that will be not much less devastating with cashflow that sends 100-200 a month to CapEx reserves, but I'm kinda working on the assumption that that kind of work is filtered out during due diligence. I understand things go wrong, and bad things happen, oh well. I'd be in a bad spot regardless.

To say cashflow isn't as important as appreciation for wealth building is accurate. I agree with that. But saying that eclipses the importance of cashflow given the discussion I'm looking for. Using an unexpected repair as justification for not caring about cashflow as much as appreciation doesn't really address the issue, especially when appreciation also operates on the idea that the property's condition doesn't decline relative to comps.


From what I understand about REI and cashflow, cashflow should cover not only PITI, but maintenance, repair reserves, prop management, etc. If i buy a property only to cover the mortgage, then come out of pocket for repairs, then it sounds like more of a flip than a rental property.

If cashflow doesn't cover all the operting expenses, it doesn't necessarily mean it is a bad investment given appreciation. I can get behind that, no problem. I'm paying a little out of pocket budget-wise to cover costs in return for appreciation and equity built mostly from other sources. That is answering a question I was looking for, and something I will add to my anaylses. It does beg the question about sustainability and scalability. But im guessing if the expectation is an exit to redirect equity better maybe that doesn't matter as much.

Post: early stage strategy comparisons

Anthony KlemmPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Posts 12
  • Votes 8

So I'm in the early stages of developing a beginning strategy for myself in Las Vegas. I've been analyzing the market for only about a month and a half and noticing that prices of multifamily and single family homes are resulting in a PITI payment that is entirely way too close to competitive rent prices to justify investing for cashflow. Granted, my analyses are not based on due diligence like actually getting properties appraised and simply going off available info on various MLS portals. It just seems nearly impossible to filter for properties that allow enough of a DSCR to cover things like CapEx, maintenance, and property management costs. I'm calculating for prop management even though I would likely owner-operate because I need to make something off the deal if I am focused on cashflow, especially if I scale and actually need to hire a manager.

Given that interest rates in the area are about 7% and prices for single family and small multifamily have doubled (and tripled) in 7 years, the barrier feels way higher than it really should be. If I were looking for more appreciation instead of cashflow, this would seem like an amazing market. But for cashflow this is terrible.

Comparatively speaking, I do see properties that need capital improvements. I haven't gone into so much analysis to see what opportunities truly exist for BRRR strategies, but on the surface (and despite the different risk profile) it appears that this strategy may be better for developing a portfolio early on to eventually get into an appreciation friendly market.

My questions basically are:

- What do you think of this perspective on the Las Vegas market? Do you have any insight into the Las Vegas market to clarify what I am seeing? Am I even correct in my basic analysis of the market?

- How does the comparative analysis between the 2 strategies hold up in your view?

- What is it that my perspective/analysis may severely be lacking in?

- Is there anything else about this topic that pops up to you?

Post: New to REI, trying to connect with folks

Anthony KlemmPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Posts 12
  • Votes 8
Quote from @Derrick Keller:

Hi Anthony! 

Congrats on starting your REI career! I live in the Las Vegas market and have investments and a real estate brokerage in Henderson. Las Vegas attracts investors from all over the world for good reason so I think you are on the right track starting here before expanding. If you have questions I am happy to help. A great thing about my team is we handle the sale and property management side for investors!

Oh perfect! I will definitely be in touch soon. Thank you for reaching out!!

Post: SEC registration and exemptions

Anthony KlemmPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Posts 12
  • Votes 8
Quote from @Dominic Mazzarella:
Quote from @Anthony Klemm:
Quote from @Dominic Mazzarella:
Quote from @Anthony Klemm:

Newbie here with some questions...

I've been reading a bit about syndications and how they function as a whole. I understand that they operate in real estate under one of a few exemptions from registering as a security with the SEC. However, as curiosity prodded, I looked into the degree that it is prohibitively expensive to consider just filing as a security anyway, irrespective of the pros and cons.

Basically, I searched for "what are the costs for registering a security with the SEC" as well as "what are the costs for registering a syndication as a security with the SEC"

Most the results produced explained something to the extent that the fee was about 150 bucks per million offered, without any other information on what would validate the explanation that filing a syndication as a security is prohibitively expensive. My assumption is that this means that in order to raise 50 million as a security, the fee for said shares would be just 7500 dollars. I couldn't really find much else in my search. What exactly is it that I am missing from my search? What about my search is producing such limited information? What other costs are actually there that aren't coming up in my search that don't exist when simply filing for exemption?

Is it not so much the fee for filing that makes it prohibitive but that the equity offered rules out the viability of being a GP in a registered security this way? 


The filing fees with the SEC are usually minimal, as you’ve found. The real prohibitive costs come from the legal, compliance, and reporting requirements of registering a security. These include drafting offering documents, adhering to ongoing disclosure rules, and audits, which can easily run tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. That’s why many syndicators rely on exemptions like Reg D (506(b) or 506(c))—it’s not about the filing fee, but avoiding the regulatory burden and costs of full SEC registration. If you're serious about this, it's probably time to reach out to an attorney for more nuanced advice.
Thanks for the reply Dominic. It makes sense now seeing that its more about ongoing duties after registration.

Were I in a position to pursue syndication, I would certainly follow your advice and seek an attorney. For the moment though, I am just trying to gain a more robust understanding of all things real estate that I could reasonably see in my future.

No problem at all. Another thing to note is that syndication doesn't really make sense for smaller deals since the compliance costs would be too much of a burden. 

I noticed that its mostly for fairly large multifamily properties, like 100+ units.

All other things being equal, at what property valualtion do you think it starts becoming a more reasonable approach? 5$ million? Lower than that? 25$ million? Higher? 

Post: SEC registration and exemptions

Anthony KlemmPosted
  • New to Real Estate
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Posts 12
  • Votes 8
Quote from @Dominic Mazzarella:
Quote from @Anthony Klemm:

Newbie here with some questions...

I've been reading a bit about syndications and how they function as a whole. I understand that they operate in real estate under one of a few exemptions from registering as a security with the SEC. However, as curiosity prodded, I looked into the degree that it is prohibitively expensive to consider just filing as a security anyway, irrespective of the pros and cons.

Basically, I searched for "what are the costs for registering a security with the SEC" as well as "what are the costs for registering a syndication as a security with the SEC"

Most the results produced explained something to the extent that the fee was about 150 bucks per million offered, without any other information on what would validate the explanation that filing a syndication as a security is prohibitively expensive. My assumption is that this means that in order to raise 50 million as a security, the fee for said shares would be just 7500 dollars. I couldn't really find much else in my search. What exactly is it that I am missing from my search? What about my search is producing such limited information? What other costs are actually there that aren't coming up in my search that don't exist when simply filing for exemption?

Is it not so much the fee for filing that makes it prohibitive but that the equity offered rules out the viability of being a GP in a registered security this way? 


The filing fees with the SEC are usually minimal, as you’ve found. The real prohibitive costs come from the legal, compliance, and reporting requirements of registering a security. These include drafting offering documents, adhering to ongoing disclosure rules, and audits, which can easily run tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. That’s why many syndicators rely on exemptions like Reg D (506(b) or 506(c))—it’s not about the filing fee, but avoiding the regulatory burden and costs of full SEC registration. If you're serious about this, it's probably time to reach out to an attorney for more nuanced advice.
Thanks for the reply Dominic. It makes sense now seeing that its more about ongoing duties after registration.

Were I in a position to pursue syndication, I would certainly follow your advice and seek an attorney. For the moment though, I am just trying to gain a more robust understanding of all things real estate that I could reasonably see in my future.