Hey Kyle, great post and something that I have been putting a lot of thought into recently.
I do have one question though, and it might be kind of long so I will try to use easy number. Lets say the following is true (also these numbers are indicative of my current situation):
-Purchase price/Property type: $300k for a 3 unit (3 bedroom/1 bathroom each).
-Financing: Purchasing w/ FHA financing. Approx $11k down (excluding closing costs). Comes to about $2400 in Mortgage/PMI/Tax/Insurance
-Rent: $1300/unit is middle of the road for this type of property. Gross rent $2600 while living in the property and $3900 after moving out (not accounting for vacancy rate).
-Again, rough numbers, but as you can see this should work out to cash flow pretty decently. This leads me to my actual question...
If all of the numbers are true AND we assume that the house does not appreciate, then with an $11k initial investment and holding for the entirety of the 30 year mortgage, the property would have cash flowed $180k (based on $500/mo cash flow average) and would hopefully still be worth the $300k, but lets say that I made a bad choice and overtime the market I am in goes down 30% and the house is worth $210k.
All in all, my initial $11k investment would now be worth around $400k after the 30 year life of the mortgage (assuming I save cashflow and sell at $210k). Again, not accounting for other expenses and vacancy, but just using rough numbers.
Wouldn't this be better than putting $11k into a low cost index fun (assuming 8% interest rate) which would be worth around $111k after the same 30 years? Even though the property in this example did not appreciate, the return on my initial investment seems far superior with the investment in real estate.
Apologies for the drawn out question, but looking forward to your thoughts here.