Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Alan Asriants

Alan Asriants has started 95 posts and replied 1417 times.

Post: Top areas to buy rental properties in Phila, PA

Alan Asriants
#1 Rehabbing & House Flipping Contributor
Posted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 1,432
  • Votes 1,021

Hey Kevin, I always focus on the three main rules of RE:

1. Location

2. Location

3. Location

If you hear that Philly is Block by block, I would shy away from that that advice. That means that they are buying in risky areas hoping for major change in gentrification and appreciation. 

The following neighborhoods are best for appreciation and long term holds although cash flow might be tight:

Far NE Phila

Roxborough

Manyunk

East Falls

W Mount Airy

Parts of E Mount Airy

Chestnut Hill

Farimount

Grad hosptial

Fitler Sq

Old City

There are some more here and there but these stand out to me most. best of luck! 

Post: Is the market going wild???

Alan Asriants
#1 Rehabbing & House Flipping Contributor
Posted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 1,432
  • Votes 1,021

Same kind of market here. The NE I hear is especially bad. NJ market near New York is nuts. And the kinds of houses flying off the shelves is bonkers to me.

Anything that hits the market as flipper that is even an ounce worthy for a project is just scooped up at a price that makes 0 sense. 

With the interest rates dipping a bit I am afraid this might only get worse. What I don't understand is how people are affording some of these payments. Seems like people max out their CC debt sometimes. 

Unfortunately you gotta get buyers that are willing to waive contingencies and go higher if the home has multiple offers, or start looking at homes that are already sitting on the market.

I set the expectation up front that the market is like this, this way buyers are not shocked - its normalized. For weaker buyers see what homes are nice but perhaps might've been overpriced when listed - could be opportunity for your buyer to get in with some negotiation and keeping their contingencies. 

Post: Adding extra bedrooms to your property will NOT always increase your rent/sale price!

Alan Asriants
#1 Rehabbing & House Flipping Contributor
Posted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 1,432
  • Votes 1,021
Quote from @Stuart Udis:

1 to 2 and 2 to 3 beds are generally the bedroom count increases that not only lead to the greatest price differences but also rent increases.  However you are absolutely correct this only matters if the space is sufficient to accommodate functional bedrooms and functional living spaces with a proportionate bathroom count.

 I see it with section 8 in particular where landlords squeeze as many bedrooms into their housing as possible but make the homes functionally obsolete for any other purposes. Most who make these awful layouts are chasing cash flow and are not making investment decisions based on market fundamentals. However in the off chance they get lucky and they bought into a neighborhood that shows signs of transition, they eliminated their ability to take advantage of the changing neighborhood because of their terrible house renovation. 

On the other hand, I see investors who make larger units compared to their competition often perform quite well. Although this is going to be neighborhood specific and its important to understand the market where you invest.  First off, the cost PSF on construction goes down as units get larger so even if they may be collecting less per sq ft on rent, it's not detrimental. Furthermore, over time less vacancy provides an upper hand. I experienced this when I became an accidental landlord with a few new construction condos that were delivered in a bad market. They are now some of my best performing rentals. They are 2 and 3 bed units that are about 20% larger than most 2 bedroom apartments in the neighborhood and not only do I rent them at premium rents, but leasing the units when they turn over is incredibly easy. This is not something your spreadsheet necessarily shows in year 1 but makes a huge difference over an extended period of time.


 Great points overall. I like the fact that you mentioned turnover. With well priced units that are functionally better than the market, your tenants are certainly more likely to stay longer. Why go back out into the market, pay for moving and deal with the hassle to find something less functional and not much cheaper. 

Unless financial they can or they can't, they will likely stay longer with a favorable layout. 

The squeezing of bedrooms in Section 8 rentals is too real. Investors believe that more bedrooms will get higher rent payouts by Section 8, which can be true, but then you create the exact issue you mention. A space that is functionally obsolete. And the less obsolete your layout is, the harder it will be to rent to higher qualified candidates. You will be left with those who don't have many options. Likely a bad outcome for the landlord.

Investing is all about mitigating risk and increasing opportunity. Squeezing bedrooms is not a means to that. 

Post: Adding extra bedrooms to your property will NOT always increase your rent/sale price!

Alan Asriants
#1 Rehabbing & House Flipping Contributor
Posted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 1,432
  • Votes 1,021

Working with a lot of investors, I often get asked whether adding an extra bedroom is worth it. On paper, it makes mathematical sense: more bedrooms often translate to a higher sales price or increased rental value. But before you go putting up framing for a new bedroom, there’s something important you need to consider—livable space.

Yes, a three-bedroom unit will generally rent for more than a two-bedroom. But you have to look beyond just the bedroom count. Square footage, layout, and functionality matter just as much—if not more. A three-bedroom unit squeezed into 1,000 square feet with one bathroom and three tiny bedrooms may not perform better than a spacious two-bedroom, two-bath unit with generous closets and well-sized rooms. The latter often attracts a more affluent or stable tenant pool because the space feels better and lives better.

When you walk into a property, it's not just about having a higher bedroom count—the space needs to make sense. If there’s no room for a sofa, the living room feels cramped, and one of the bedrooms barely fits a twin bed, are you really adding value? In fact, that can make the unit harder to rent. I speak on this from experience.

My first project was a major rehab where I had to fully reframe three units. I was proud of the improved functionality, but on the second and third floors, I tried to squeeze two bedrooms into small spaces. The result? A tiny "efficiency" two-bedroom with no real living or dining space. It was difficult to market because, while it had the bedroom count, it didn’t feel like a true two-bedroom. Couples or small families would walk in expecting more and leave disappointed.

Eventually, I decided to re-market the unit as a one-bedroom with a large living area—and everything changed. Interest spiked. The tenants who came could actually envision living there. They could see a proper living room, a comfortable setup, and the potential of the space. I didn’t reframe anything, but that shift in perception made all the difference.

And here’s the kicker—I didn’t make less money renting it as a one-bedroom. Because of the improved functionality and feel, I was able to command near market rates for a two-bedroom anyway. Why? Because tenants value layout and comfort just as much as the number of bedrooms. A well-designed one-bedroom can outperform a cramped two-bedroom any day of the week.

So when you’re considering adding a bedroom or reframing a unit, think about the overall livability. Is there enough closet space? Can someone comfortably put a sofa and watch TV? Is there room for a dining table? A crammed layout packed with bedrooms won’t attract quality tenants or buyers.

Bottom line: Functionality often beats bedroom count. Design with the end user in mind—not just the listing description.

Post: When to add a new floor?

Alan Asriants
#1 Rehabbing & House Flipping Contributor
Posted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 1,432
  • Votes 1,021

it all depends on your end user and buyer. Typically these kinds of major improvements work best and very affluent neighborhoods. The reason is because the ceiling no pun intended, is a lot higher than other lower class neighborhoods. 

So if there are plenty of sales that are higher priced doing major improvements is OK because the market can absorb it. Where are you? Don't wanna do this is by trying to push. You were record-breaking sales number in a neighborhood. 

For example:

Neighborhood A: AVG price is 1M. Your homes current value: $500k - With Addition EST: $850k
Neighborhood B: AVG price is 450k. Your homes current value: $400k - With Addition EST: $650k

This example is obviously a little bit more straightforward, but paints the general picture. 

Also, the notion of simply adding bedrooms to a property is incredibly silly. A five bedroom house in 1000 ft.² is going to feel incredibly tight compared to a nice two bedroom two bathroom layout in the same space. In fact many Philly flippers found out about this the hard way and tried to force 4 bedrooms in a 2 bedroom home. Those who did best, maximized the space. Believe it or not closet space is really important. :)

I made this mistake on my first major rehab. I forced 2 beds instead of one thinking I could pull off higher rents. Set and done in the spaces felt incredibly tight I realized that no one would consider my apartment a true two bedroom. After a month of marketing it in this way, I changed the listing to 1 bedroom and my results improved significantly. 

The crammed 2 bed now felt like a large 1 bedroom! 

Post: Houston Investor Looking to Buy First House-Hack at the End of 2025

Alan Asriants
#1 Rehabbing & House Flipping Contributor
Posted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 1,432
  • Votes 1,021

Hey Jordan, Welcome to the BP community. Good for you for starting early and having these goals. My 2 cents, don't get too caught up on how man units you should own. Being financially independent is an awesome goal and what everyone wants, but it means different things to different people. 

I know some who are comfortable on 60k a year and make do with it. For many aspiring RE investors, that number is typically much higher. Not that it is not impossible, but understanding that it takes years and possibly decades to reach that point. 

I have been investing since 2020 and throwing every dollar I have had into RE and now have 7 properties totaling 15 units. I took advantage of low interest rates which certainly helps my cash flow, but I am by no means 100% fully financially independent to my standards. If I pay them off, yes I will be. So in the future if I maintain my portfolio and get rid of my debt I can certainly be there.

Also don't mix up financially free with owning a business. Chasing cash flow usually leads to choosing areas that are more demanding and take up most of your time - thats not financial freedom - thats owning a business. 

Like most businesses - higher in cash flow, more time and effort to take care of, and outsales are usually minimal.

Investments - smaller cash flow returns, better wealth builders over time

I would focus on A-B class areas that have great historical data for appreciation.

Good luck!

Post: What should I do with this 100k sitting in my savings?

Alan Asriants
#1 Rehabbing & House Flipping Contributor
Posted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 1,432
  • Votes 1,021

There's a lot of options you have and no answer is particularly right or wrong. It's all about what is right for you in your situation. 

If you believe you can repurpose that capital and make more money on it, then do so and then set aside a portion of it for RE investing. With the real estate market the way it is right now if you were to take that hundred thousand dollars and put it into a property you pretty much will have it locked in there for a considerable amount of time until you can see real growth through appreciation. 

I keep hearing that Lending money is a great way to make money. We are in a pretty high interest rate market, so the margins are even better for people who lend money. Of course they're a caveats and you want to make sure that you do it the right way and speak with a mentor. 

When you are ready to deploy your savings into a long-term rental asset, make sure that you're buying in the right area, an area you know best, and the right kind of property. When you're finally ready to make the step, remember that most of your wealth will be built through equity, not cash flow. So don't chase cash flow in cheap markets. Instead try to find a middle ground where you are in an area that appreciates well historically and can cover your expenses + a little bonus. 

I always recommend A-B class properties in neighborhoods you know best.

Good luck!

Post: First Rental Property - North Jersey House Hack

Alan Asriants
#1 Rehabbing & House Flipping Contributor
Posted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 1,432
  • Votes 1,021

Likely 4 units in your area are very expensive and hard to come by. Don't pass up a solid duplex hoping for a better quadplex.

Post: Connect for opportunities in PA/NJ Single/Multi-Family and Mentorship/Advice

Alan Asriants
#1 Rehabbing & House Flipping Contributor
Posted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 1,432
  • Votes 1,021

Hello Shaina, and welcome to the BP Community. 

As a new investor I always recommend choosing an area you know best. This will help you differentiate a good deal from a bad one. Relying heavily on connections you dont fully know is not always the best move. 

Pick a market you know well and attack it. If you know a market well, you will be able to recognize whether it is a good property/deal or not. 

Even if I find you a solid deal, you likely won't jump on it if you don't know the area. 

Don't pick a market because its cheap. Usually if its too good to be true, its likely too good to be true.

Unsure of an area? Drive by and get to know it

best of luck and reach out anytime

Post: Why I Encourage San Diego Locals to Invest Here First (Even if It’s More Expensive)

Alan Asriants
#1 Rehabbing & House Flipping Contributor
Posted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Posts 1,432
  • Votes 1,021
Quote from @Twana Rasoul:
Quote from @Alan Asriants:

People in expensive markets certainly have a bigger challenge to get started simply because of purchase price. 

So instead of learning their market further, saving up, etc. they look for other alternatives - like OOS investing. 

The crazy returns seem out of this world for them and they are naturally gravitated towards them. Who wouldn't be?

but this kind of a out-of-state investing can be extremely risky. This is because you're putting yourself in a very well position and trusting people that you don't know telling you things about areas that are thousands of miles away from you. And while the numbers and returns seem really good and sexy often times the entire picture is not being told. 

High vacancy rates, higher evictions, higher property, damages, higher nonpayment of rent etc. The out-of-state, investing marketing program is often times like pharmacy advertising. 

When you hear of all of the great benefits and then 1 minute of all the potential health risks and side effects. Except they leave that last part out.

If you want to chase cash flow, invest in a business. If you want to invest in real estate, buy a solid appreciating property in a great location. Finding the middle ground is ideal, but remember that most of your wealth will be made through appreciation NOT cash flow. Thats why its called investing. 

At the end of the day, what I tell people is that the best area to invest in is the one that they know well. Good post.


 It’s surprising how many BP'ers would choose a property with $100/month positive cash flow in a low-cost, low-appreciation market over one with $100/month negative cash flow in a high-cost, high-growth market like San Diego—assuming similar upfront investment.

While cash flow is important, it’s not the only factor in building wealth through real estate. In many cases, the long-term appreciation, rent growth, and tax advantages in strong coastal markets can far outweigh a small initial monthly shortfall—especially for investors thinking long-term.

Ironically, many who swear off any deal with negative cash flow are also contributing to a 401(k)—which is essentially negative cash flow. You're putting money in each month, with no immediate return, betting on long-term growth. Real estate works the same way in many solid markets, but with far more control, leverage, and overall benefits.

The blanket rule of “never buy negative cash flow” can lead investors to overlook wealth-building opportunities in markets that have historically outperformed over time.


 Your cost of repairs and maintenance are very similar for a 100k property and a 400k property. Costs of licensing, trash removal, sewer replacements etc are the same in my area for a D class area and an A class area. I'd rather put money towards the more expensive property. 

replacing all your windows and spending 10k on that project is 10% of the cost of your 100k home and 2.5% of your 400k home.

Meanwhile 10% appreciation on 400k is 40k and 10k on a 100k home...