Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Kenneth Bell

Kenneth Bell has started 6 posts and replied 135 times.

Post: What do investors see as a solid LP return?

Kenneth BellPosted
  • Developer
  • Charlotte, NC
  • Posts 208
  • Votes 99
Quote from @Adam Bartomeo:

Have you tested the market yet with this set up? If this is the first time that you are doing this then why would you have a tiered approach? If you put it out there and no one is biting, then you know that the numbers aren't enough for the investors. I understand that you bring value to the table. When I first started partnering my silent partners brought the cash and I did all of the work, it was a 50/50 split. That worked for the value that I was bringing to the table and for what the market would allow. My gut tells me that the tiered approach will be a struggle for most investors to get past. There are too many ways to manipulate the numbers for them to work in your favor. Without knowing further detail it is hard to say 20/80 is right but my thoughts are that it is not even enough.


Yes we have done a tiered structure before. It is common in GP/LP deals the straddle or hurdle allows for the developers performance to earn him a better return. As he does better for the LP's he does better for himself as well. We base the straddle on the IRR and all other fees are disclosed up front so there is no way to manipulate the numbers. I have not published any numbers or solicited to anyone on this deal. I wanted some thoughts and feedback from people on the forum.

Post: What do investors see as a solid LP return?

Kenneth BellPosted
  • Developer
  • Charlotte, NC
  • Posts 208
  • Votes 99
Quote from @Don Spafford:

Most syndication offers over the past couple of years have not done much to get my attention. What did was learning about RV Campground syndications. They still target double digit cash on cash, 3X equity multiples, 18%-25%+ IRR, and potential for huge depreciation. I have not seen anything else that comes close to that other than maybe oil drilling, which i more risky in my opinion. I also do invest in ground up build to rent MF, but those are also unique deals where you get your capital back after about 5 years but still hold equity going forward indefinitely so that you get infinite returns from the cash flows and the equity continues to grow over time. I will be happy to share info on both of those with anyone interested to learn more. And for those who just don't like syndications, there are many private lending opportunities that can also pay pretty high returns. I do that as well.


 Wow that is great!! You have BTR deals that you are 20% per year back on invested capital!! I would love to hear more about that. Please DM the information

Post: What do investors see as a solid LP return?

Kenneth BellPosted
  • Developer
  • Charlotte, NC
  • Posts 208
  • Votes 99
Quote from @G. Brian Davis:
Quote from @Kenneth Bell:
Quote from @G. Brian Davis:
When we go in on deals together in our investment club, we typically aim for mid-teens or higher. We make exceptions for especially low-risk investments, in which case we might accept as little as 10%.
Ground-up development is not low-risk however, with a few uncommon exceptions. We'd probably have to believe it would pay us high-teens IRR, and would have to feel really confident in the sponsor's experience, construction crew, and local expertise.

 Thanks for the reply Brian.  I will take what you said into consideration. I am curious as to why you consider ground up development more more risky than value add? I have heard this a few times and I want to understand from the investors perspective why that is.  


It typically takes several years for a building to finish and start generating income, and market conditions can change over that time. More supply could hit the market, for example, or cap rates could expand fast and leave the developer trying to figure out how to rent and hold the units. With existing properties you have the potential for immediate cash flow, and you know the market rent with precision. You also (hopefully) have an experienced property management team and plenty of runway on the debt, letting the sponsor pick and choose the right time to sell or refinance, rather than being forced into it upon completion of the buildings.
Just my two cents. Doesn't mean ground-up development is a bad investment. I'm open to it. I'd just have to feel more confident than usual that local market conditions won't change for the worse over the next 2-3 years.

 I will agree that the build out process takes a while and then you must lease up as well. I do think that in the end you have a superior product to a value add. We have done research for absorption and the market size for the units we will develop. The land is also already entitled for mixed use so we have the commercial piece as well. I do consider the time and the type of investor I would look for in a deal like this. We have a management team that is ready to manage the residential and commercial space. 

No I have not published any numbers or to anyone in the way of returns as of yet. We have a few preliminary meetings with some investment groups that that like to participate as  LP's. Would you be willing to share structure for any ground up or value add deals you have done? I would really appreciate the insight!

Post: What do investors see as a solid LP return?

Kenneth BellPosted
  • Developer
  • Charlotte, NC
  • Posts 208
  • Votes 99
Quote from @G. Brian Davis:
When we go in on deals together in our investment club, we typically aim for mid-teens or higher. We make exceptions for especially low-risk investments, in which case we might accept as little as 10%.
Ground-up development is not low-risk however, with a few uncommon exceptions. We'd probably have to believe it would pay us high-teens IRR, and would have to feel really confident in the sponsor's experience, construction crew, and local expertise.

 Thanks for the reply Brian.  I will take what you said into consideration. I am curious as to why you consider ground up development more more risky than value add? I have heard this a few times and I want to understand from the investors perspective why that is.  

Post: What do investors see as a solid LP return?

Kenneth BellPosted
  • Developer
  • Charlotte, NC
  • Posts 208
  • Votes 99
Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:

Right now with the Syndication MF model seemingly leaking oil all over the place.

Any return will be great so many are not returning anything and asking for Cash calls.

from my personal perspective I would do anything I could to NOT syndicate and subject yourself to those risks in case the deals don't work .. they don't work and you get massacred on SM etc etc.

Myself I would, if you need partners go for just a very few in more of a JV format with you as the managing member..

there is a ton to being a GP syndicator raising 3 to 5 mil 50k at a time.. you now have 100 partners and the amount of oversight  customer care and Risk in my mind has to be considered compared to what you do now which is build sell and make nice bucks without being beholding to anyone but your construction lender. ??

That is my other side of the coin thoughts.. Do you really need 100 small investors and are you really prepared to deal with all that comes with it.. As much as anything like @Chris Seveney points out frequently the annual reporting can be complex and costly and its mandatory otherwise your running some serious SEC risks..  On top of that to give 80% away I don't get that.  Do smaller deals and keep it all.


 Hey Jay,

I would prefer not to have 100 investors to manage for sure. I don't want yet another job. Because we are in house with our development deals I am not counting on someone else's ability to find a good development deal. I do also love my develop and sell model bit it comes with its down sides as well. You must keep your pipeline full because there is no cashflow without it. I have been fortunate to be in a city that has been resistant to the volatility of other markets. It is also growing so fast income would be welcomed because values continue to rise. It is a balancing act for sure. I hope to pick a direction.  This is one we just got entitled for 35 door and its in an opportunity zone so it has some great long term tax benefits. new 35 door townhome community possible BTR

Post: What do investors see as a solid LP return?

Kenneth BellPosted
  • Developer
  • Charlotte, NC
  • Posts 208
  • Votes 99
Quote from @Gino Barbaro:

@Kenneth Bell

Are you looking to build, hold and then refi capital back to investors, and then keep them in the deal? It seems like you want to build, then refi out to perm.

I really like the new build, no cap ex, much easier to manage, and you have a new asset for the foreseeable future. 

I think you need to know who your investors are. Do they want upside? Or possibly just a pref rate? Your goals need to align with whoever your potential investors are.

I would schedule a call with a securities attorney, such as @Kim Lisa Taylor to walk through your structure, returns, and business plan, especially if this is your first syndication.

There will be demand for your type of deal, especially investors who want a flight to quality in this part of the market cycle

Gino


 Thanks Gino, I have already had engagement with attorneys and I am moving forward. Deal structure would be leverage GP/LP equity for A and D and vertical construction debt and then refi to perm and hold the asset. I have lenders I have relationships with who will lend end to end.  We could possibly refi out some equity on the perm but it would depend on rates. We have used investors before but we sold assets in the past.  I like ground up development as well. Even though the time frame to monetize is longer. I also ramp up debt service as I go, not all at once. I have a brand new product at the end and I should have less cost in the way of maintenance.  I am confident in our model also because most bigger developers will pass on a 30-50 door apartment site because of their operational overhead is so high.

Post: What do investors see as a solid LP return?

Kenneth BellPosted
  • Developer
  • Charlotte, NC
  • Posts 208
  • Votes 99
Quote from @Chris Seveney:
Quote from @Kenneth Bell:

Hello all,

I am a real estate developer who has for the past 10 year solely focused on develp build and sell assets. I am now looking at a few deals that we will develop and then keep them in a GP/LP relationship. I am looking at the landscape of other multifamily GP/LP deals and it seems there is a wide range for both IRR and equity splits between GP/LP. I am trying to get a pulse on what is a good return metric for LP's. I am a strictly ground up developer. I am new to GP/LP deals but not new to development. I was targeting a 20/80 GP/LP with a 12-13% IRR with a 2 hurdles +14% IRR GP/LP goes to 30/70

+15.5% IRR GP/LP goes to 40/60.

These will be usually 25 to 50 unit infill multifamily deals usually townhomes or apartments

I would love the feedback


 We have seen projected returns all over the place, as the factor that comes into play is the risk. If you went to the roulette table and they paid 3-1 for red vs black vs 2-1 then that would be awesome but if it paid 1.5-1 that would stink. Similar to real estate, ground up construction typically has higher risk because time factor can play a more important role and there are no monies generated early on. 

It also will depend on your investor profile, depending on where you get your $ will depend on what they find acceptable. I am in a group of 1,000 accredited investors and when I share my offering it goes over like a lead balloon because the majority of them want high risk high return. 


 I get your point. I have dealt with investors before who want a grand slam  all the time and that is not realistic nor is it the type of deals I tend to do. If I cannot make a great land deal then I don't take on the project for development. I am also not looking for investors that think that every deal is going to make them rich. Thanks for your insight.

Post: Development Opportunity but limited experience

Kenneth BellPosted
  • Developer
  • Charlotte, NC
  • Posts 208
  • Votes 99

@Kesha Hamilton

Hey Kesha,

I would also not buy land until you have done all needed DD and have an exit that will work. If you can tie up the land and give yourself enough time so see if the value is there. You also need to understand what the current zoning is and and current development value. You could possibly rezone for greater density if possible. Until you have a proper valuation for raw land you cannot make an offer. Land valuation is a derivative of the value that can be placed on the land. This takes some dd and homework to come up with.

Post: What do investors see as a solid LP return?

Kenneth BellPosted
  • Developer
  • Charlotte, NC
  • Posts 208
  • Votes 99

Hello all,

I am a real estate developer who has for the past 10 year solely focused on develp build and sell assets. I am now looking at a few deals that we will develop and then keep them in a GP/LP relationship. I am looking at the landscape of other multifamily GP/LP deals and it seems there is a wide range for both IRR and equity splits between GP/LP. I am trying to get a pulse on what is a good return metric for LP's. I am a strictly ground up developer. I am new to GP/LP deals but not new to development. I was targeting a 20/80 GP/LP with a 12-13% IRR with a 2 hurdles +14% IRR GP/LP goes to 30/70

+15.5% IRR GP/LP goes to 40/60.

These will be usually 25 to 50 unit infill multifamily deals usually townhomes or apartments

I would love the feedback

Post: How Best to Connect with Land Developers in Atlanta?

Kenneth BellPosted
  • Developer
  • Charlotte, NC
  • Posts 208
  • Votes 99

Hey @Ilan Cohen,

I sometimes sell some of my entitled deal that I don't want to go vertical on. One good way is to list the property if you have purchased it of course. If not if you have site control you can look at other permits for construction in the area for other projects. These are all public record and you can find the builder who will lead you to the developer if they are different people.

What type of deals are you doing in Atlanta? I am interested in that market. Depending on density and price of course!!