Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Aaron Taylor

Aaron Taylor has started 3 posts and replied 148 times.

Post: Passive VS Active Multi-Family Investing

Aaron TaylorPosted
  • Olathe, KS
  • Posts 148
  • Votes 207

@John Allen if I were you, and had the available funds, I would invest in both a syndication and your own smaller investment (like duplex/4 plex) to start.  Then basically see how you like both, there are good aspects to either.  Control and time commitment are probably the biggest things.  You're probably going to get better returns as an active investor as long as you choose good investments.  It would be really hard to replace your income from just passive investments to start unless you have a large pile of cash or have a long time horizon.

To put it this way, with active investing you can find a deal and a huge return on it to start.  That's pretty hard to do in passive.

Post: Where is the Cashflow?!

Aaron TaylorPosted
  • Olathe, KS
  • Posts 148
  • Votes 207

@Matt Hudson if you have $250k in the bank already, then I don't think I'd start with BRRRR, it'd be a waste of your time. You BRRRR when you have more time than money, and it appears like you have the opposite issue. It seems like you could just buy a single family home or duplex to get your feet wet, then look for a small multi to scale up some. With 250k, I'd concentrate on getting deals (deal flow) as finding just one good deal will probably make you as much equity as you'd gain working on this BRRRR in a fraction of the time.

Post: BRRRR Reality Check for a Newbie

Aaron TaylorPosted
  • Olathe, KS
  • Posts 148
  • Votes 207

BRRRR works really well when there's a decent level of appreciation going on, because even though your cash flow may be small, the appreciation makes up for it. When the market is slowing down like it is now, then repairs may eat your cashflow and appreciation may be zero making it effectively 'dead equity' in your property. Everyone has a different situation due to their tax bracket and market. Like if you have 25% equity in a 100k house that's bringing in net of $100 per month with little appreciation currently, then it's possible that just selling the house and putting that money towards something else might be a better idea.

Now if you're getting 4% to 5% appreciation with rents climbing quickly then BRRRR is going to work really well. All depends on the market and your personal tax situation.

Post: Are EARLY RISERS MORE SUCCESSFUL than those who sleep in?

Aaron TaylorPosted
  • Olathe, KS
  • Posts 148
  • Votes 207

In my corporate career I haven't seen very much correlation between getting to work early or later EXCEPT for those who arrive at work significantly later than others...their production is definitely lower than others typically.  The irony is that on occasion some upper level bosses have thought that employee was 'going the extra mile' when really they were there by themselves because they got to work 90 minutes after everyone else, lol.

@George Gammon Do you have that 2012 chart in 2019 form?  I was wondering where it looked today.  I've been looking at a lot of the same information you and Mike have, but finding more up to date charts has been challenging.  Basically, I'm trying to determine what real estate asset classes are overvalued compared to their historic norm and by how much.  My general 'gut' feeling from tons of reading and podcasts is that:

multifamily is overvalued compared to historic norm

entry level housing is red hot but upper level housing is turning very cold

retail doesn't seem as hot as the other sectors, or at least it's not being talked about nearly as much

But I haven't seen many charts that would articulate this data.

Post: $1M to SFHs or Syndications

Aaron TaylorPosted
  • Olathe, KS
  • Posts 148
  • Votes 207
Originally posted by @Matt Ward:
Originally posted by @Aaron Taylor:
Originally posted by @Matt Ward:
Originally posted by @Aaron Taylor:

My concern with multifamily syndications right now revolves around interest rates and optimistic underwriting.  If rates were to rise even 2% to 3% I'm not sure if any of their refi or exit plans would work due to the next buyer being unable to afford it.  It kind of feels like multifamily syndication is the new house flipping, lol, so many books and podcasts on it.  If I were going to put money into one right now, I'd choose my sponsor very carefully.

Frankly, single family housing seems priced better than multifamily right now.  It doesn't scale, but someone will have to explain to me why an 8 plex 5 cap is a better investment than your usual 1% rule single family house (probably an 8 cap) in the same area.  I see people paying dumb money for returns that don't seem to make any sense.

I think there are several answers why a multifamily investment is better than a SFH if priced similarly, although that is hard to do. Economies of scale for one, economic vacancy is another, valuation processes is a 3rd, and so on... also depends on who's asking and answering that question.

Making sure you are putting in your due diligence on the front end is important regardless of the asset type IMO, so that's kind of a wash. In my opinion, you make a considerable amount of money in RE on the buy - regardless of whether or not it's MF or SFH... so assuming that the asset is bought at the right time for the right price.... what is the benefit of SFH investing over MF (to reverse your question)?

I realize my original question might be a bit polarizing, so I appreciate everyone's input!

What would be the advantage of SFH over like a small 8 plex MF when MF is overheated like my example? I guess:

better financing terms

more available options to purchase

don't have to pay any utilities

more flexibility

longer term renters

less tenants to manage

What it wouldn't have is:

ability to scale

can't force appreciation

less renters so even though vacancies are less, the cost is higher

But my primary thing is, if I can buy 5 houses for $500k with 100k down making 8k a year combined, why would I buy an 8 plex 5 or 6 cap where I just break even? With the financing added in, you can't even make money on a lot of MF things that people are buying. I'm sure there are people getting MF off-market deals for cheaper, but that goes for the SFR too.
 

I don't think I'd agree with many of your "advantages" to SFH. Financing I'd argue is better in MF (or a wash at most), buying opportunities I'd say is a maybe (market to market - certainly not a major advantage), I pay very little utilities on my MF properties (tenants pay most) so not sure what you mean exactly, flexibility maybe if you mean it's quicker to get out of the asset (a MF sale may take longer) then I'd agree, I don't manage tenants my property manager does and the asset can afford it since its MF.... Your last comments about comparing 5 homes to an 8 plex.... seems like a specific example to fit your argument. I'm also confused about "adding financing in, you can't make money in MF"... I'm not sure I follow. Leverage is a very powerful tool in all RE but especially MF.

To flip your example, what if you invested $100k and got $8k in cash flow a year with larger tax loss kick backs, mitigated risk upon disposition due to forced appreciation, and you didn't have to lift a finger... let the experienced operator do the work.

You asked about what I said, and I explained it, but then you kind of went off into larger territory. My point was, for people not interested in doing syndications right now and want to buy smaller multi's, that SFR's are a better value in a lot of markets currently. Maybe not in your market, but I see a lot of that around mine. Bigger multi's are a totally different animal and definitely not what I was talking about. Michael Zuber has been talking about this exact phenomenon going on in his Fresno market on his podcast, so I know it's not just my area.

Post: $1M to SFHs or Syndications

Aaron TaylorPosted
  • Olathe, KS
  • Posts 148
  • Votes 207
Originally posted by @Matt Ward:
Originally posted by @Aaron Taylor:

My concern with multifamily syndications right now revolves around interest rates and optimistic underwriting.  If rates were to rise even 2% to 3% I'm not sure if any of their refi or exit plans would work due to the next buyer being unable to afford it.  It kind of feels like multifamily syndication is the new house flipping, lol, so many books and podcasts on it.  If I were going to put money into one right now, I'd choose my sponsor very carefully.

Frankly, single family housing seems priced better than multifamily right now.  It doesn't scale, but someone will have to explain to me why an 8 plex 5 cap is a better investment than your usual 1% rule single family house (probably an 8 cap) in the same area.  I see people paying dumb money for returns that don't seem to make any sense.

I think there are several answers why a multifamily investment is better than a SFH if priced similarly, although that is hard to do. Economies of scale for one, economic vacancy is another, valuation processes is a 3rd, and so on... also depends on who's asking and answering that question.

Making sure you are putting in your due diligence on the front end is important regardless of the asset type IMO, so that's kind of a wash. In my opinion, you make a considerable amount of money in RE on the buy - regardless of whether or not it's MF or SFH... so assuming that the asset is bought at the right time for the right price.... what is the benefit of SFH investing over MF (to reverse your question)?

I realize my original question might be a bit polarizing, so I appreciate everyone's input!

What would be the advantage of SFH over like a small 8 plex MF when MF is overheated like my example? I guess:

better financing terms

more available options to purchase

don't have to pay any utilities

more flexibility

longer term renters

less tenants to manage

What it wouldn't have is:

ability to scale

can't force appreciation

less renters so even though vacancies are less, the cost is higher

But my primary thing is, if I can buy 5 houses for $500k with 100k down making 8k a year combined, why would I buy an 8 plex 5 or 6 cap where I just break even? With the financing added in, you can't even make money on a lot of MF things that people are buying. I'm sure there are people getting MF off-market deals for cheaper, but that goes for the SFR too.

Post: $1M to SFHs or Syndications

Aaron TaylorPosted
  • Olathe, KS
  • Posts 148
  • Votes 207

My concern with multifamily syndications right now revolves around interest rates and optimistic underwriting.  If rates were to rise even 2% to 3% I'm not sure if any of their refi or exit plans would work due to the next buyer being unable to afford it.  It kind of feels like multifamily syndication is the new house flipping, lol, so many books and podcasts on it.  If I were going to put money into one right now, I'd choose my sponsor very carefully.

Frankly, single family housing seems priced better than multifamily right now.  It doesn't scale, but someone will have to explain to me why an 8 plex 5 cap is a better investment than your usual 1% rule single family house (probably an 8 cap) in the same area.  I see people paying dumb money for returns that don't seem to make any sense.

Post: Facebook Ads Help and info

Aaron TaylorPosted
  • Olathe, KS
  • Posts 148
  • Votes 207
Originally posted by @Mark Sewell:

I was thinking this as well.  But I do sometimes get leads.  Maybe organic search or whatever, a couple from a mail campaign, but it isn't that NOBODY clicks.  

Speed is fine.  Using carrot site.  

Could be other factors -- need more credibility, whatever.  That is really my primary theory at this point.

 Have you tried using the form directly on Facebook?  Results for me showed that it worked slightly better than a straight website link.

Post: Facebook Ads Help and info

Aaron TaylorPosted
  • Olathe, KS
  • Posts 148
  • Votes 207
Originally posted by @Mark Sewell:

@Angela Russo here is what I have been doing (this month):

Origination Campaigns

Origination: New Views -- Video View Campaign (2 short video ads) -- Wide local audience (See below)

Origination: Reach Local -- Reach Campaign (3 short video ads) -- Uploaded lists as custom audiences, didn't skip trace.

Origination: Lookalikes -- Video View Campaign (2 short video ads) -- Lookalikes of video viewers and website site visitors

Also one or two post boosts, which I don't expect much from. One video and one static.

Retargetting Campaigns

ReTGT:  Engagement -- 3 different ads sets -- Audiences: 3 phases based on time frames  

ReTGT:  Traffic -- 1 ad set, with static images (before/after) -- Audience:  Watched retargeting videos (this one got me 62% of outbound clicks the site).

ReTGT:  Video Views - 1 ad set, with 3 videos -- Audience: Site visitors, recent viewers, or otherwise engaged with content.

Spent $452 this month before shutting it off (just a couple days ago).  

But this has been my best month so far, getting it somewhat dialed in now, at least in terms of driving people to the website.  

307 total outbound clicks ($1.47 per click), and about 55,540 impressions.  This 0.55% per impression, which is about what you would get from a direct mailing.  But what would it cost to send 55,500 postcards in a month?

But zero leads, so...

Probably will regroup and create a new set of campaigns for August.

The local 'wide' audience looked like this:

several zones on a map (geographic radius), Age 47 to 65+

Interests: Home Improvements, The Home Depot, Lowe's or AARP

 If you got 307 links clicks without one response, I think there has to be an issue on your website.  There are a bunch of landing page tools that people use for things like that, maybe one of those would be worth trying?  Or try and emulate websites that you know convert, there have been a lot of podcast guests that have websites they use to get leads.

Sometimes if your website is too slow it will cause people to bounce as well, that's another thing to check.  A lot of people put way too many plugins combined with a slow theme and slow hosting to get a high bounce rate.