Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x

Posted over 12 years ago

Doing Due Diligence

So I thought I had 2 good prospects this past month, and one turned out to be a complete dud, while the other is beginning to smell like a stinker as well.


Note #1


SFR located in Las Vegas, that sold in December 2009 for $89,000 (seems reasonable for post-2008 housing crash).


Buyer came in with $20,000 down (that's good).  $69,000 seller carry back for 20 years, 8% interest.  Not a "bad" note,  I'm already thinking ahead that I can work with that and possibly restructure to increase my yield.


Buyer is retired, with 2 forms in income totaling $2700/month (not bad).


Buyer had sub-620 credit during time of purchase (bad, but offset to a certain extent by her decent down payment).


Over the phone with the seller, we agree to a price that puts me at a 15% yield, SUBJECT TO:


  1. 1.  Credit
  2. 2.  Appraisal
  3. 3.  Title
  4. 4.  Estoppel signed by the payor, including an agreement to have taxes and insurance impounded


Well, the appraisal came back at $40,000.  So, the question becomes, "what is the ugliest part of the deal?"


  • a.  > 150% LTV
  • b.  > 100% ITV
  • c.   the poor (retired) buyer who bought a house post housing market crash and is underwater?


I will write about the other note as new developments arise, but I hope this is helpful in seeing what goes on behind the scenes for a note buyer.


Bill Menacrow, of "The Paper Source" wrote a while back that he now asks for a $500 deposit from the NOTE SELLER upfront, so that he doesn't waste his time and money on things like a time-bomb of an appraisal, credit-score, etc.  I think I will start implementing this rule.


Comments (5)

  1. My grandmother always used to say, "what doesn't come out in thw wash will come out in the wringer!"


  2. The Zillow Zestimate came in at $50,800.


  3. Pat Lowry an estoppel is basically a statement that the payor signs, acknowledging that their current UPB is X, and that they're still obligated to make X payments of $X dollars for X years and that they are aware that the note is being sold and that the only thing that changes is where the payments are sent. That way, they can't give you the (BS) excuse of "I didn't know where I was sending payments" or "I thought I only had Y number of payments left."


  4. Loc, These are great, not to mention entertaining. Keep them coming. I choose c. as being the ugliest part because a. and b. can be avoided by not investing in this note. Can you talk a little more about what the Estopple is for us newbies? Also, why would the note holder ever sell this note now given these facts? Seems the note seller should also have had an idea the property value tanked prior to trying to sell it, but I guess not always. Caveat Emptor (not sure of spelling). Maybe one thing on the due dilligence list should be always taking a quick look at one of the on line services (Zillow, etc.) or talking to RE agent in area? I would be curious what those values came in at versus the appraisal. $500 deposit is excellent idea.


  5. D. all of the above. Great case study Loc! Sorry the deal turned out to be a dud.