Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x

Posted almost 9 years ago

Landlords Can't Ban Ex-Convicts

Normal 1459998297 Scales Of Justice With Gavel

This is how our criteria currently reads on our application:

Our Criteria:

We do not deny housing for race, color, religion, sex, national origin, handicap, sexual orientation, marital status, or familial status.

We do deny housing to individuals:

  • when the application is not complete or accurate
  • where there is not sufficient income/resources to pay rent and live
  • where there is poor prior tenancy: evictions, violations, damage to rental property, poorly handled move outs, amounts are still owing to landlords or utilities.

Criminal activity is at our discretion depending on severity, number of convictions, and how long ago.

On our scoring sheet we reduce an applicant some points if they have had a conviction in the past 4 years, and reduce more points if it has been in the past 3 years or is more than two convictions. We disqualify for level 2 or level 3 sex offenders.

We have rented to people with a criminal record. One of our best tenants at present had a difficult time finding housing due to some trouble with the law. We see a lot of domestic violence counts.

With this recent guidance from HUD on interpreting the Fair Housing Act, I feel like our policies are defendable, but not sure I’d want to get in a drawn out expensive battle over it. We may want to shorten up the timeframe to one and two years, and strike our additional vague disqualification for a criminal record that "could destroy our property or terrorize the neighborhood". That one has been our “flexibility” clause, but is hard to objectively measure and can be interpreted to have a pretty low threshold.



Comments