Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Insurance
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

8
Posts
1
Votes
Allen Jones
1
Votes |
8
Posts

Replacement Value question on cheap property

Allen Jones
Posted

I've got a question about insurance for a low cost property. I'm looking at a $30K single family house, it's in a C- neighborhood. The replacement cost is $125k. In the event something happened and it was a total loss, spending $125K to rebuild in that area seems unwise. What do you recommend for insurance coverage when the replacement cost far exceeds the properties actual value? 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,175
Posts
1,205
Votes
John Mocker#1 Insurance Contributor
  • Insurance Agent
  • Norwalk, CT
1,205
Votes |
2,175
Posts
John Mocker#1 Insurance Contributor
  • Insurance Agent
  • Norwalk, CT
Replied

Allen,
Below is a post I did a couple of years ago that may help:

"We write with many markets. Most of the better rates are from companies that write the Building coverage on a "Replacement Cost" (RC) basis. It is a better coverage for the policy holder than "Actual Cash Value" (ACV). A policy based on ACV will normally have a lower limit (ACV = RC minus depreciation). RC is the cost to rebuild the structure with the same kind and quality. In a market where rents are depressed, the RC will often be significantly higher than the ACV.

The problem with ACV is that, on a partial loss, the claim, under an ACV basis, has a deduction for depreciation. You will have to kick in for the deductible and the depreciation. If your Rental is in good shape, updated systems, well maintained, etc. the rates from some companies with only RC may be equivilant to others that will only do ACV. I just wrote one in CT that one of our carriers for $400,000 RC was $100 less than the next best rate which was based on $110,000 ACV for the same property.

The second item that was confusing is what the payout will be. Most policies (homeowners or dwelling/fire policies) that include RC contractually require you to rebuild in order to get the Replacement Cost. The initial payment will be for the ACV and then after you rebuild they will pay the remainder. If you chose not to rebuild you do not get more than the ACV. The reason for this clause is that the policy is to make you whole. If they paid the RC without you having to rebuild, you would be getting more than the value at the time of the loss.

Hope this helps. If you need more info on the RC vs ACV please let me know"

Loading replies...