Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Insurance
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

96
Posts
37
Votes
Jen Hoang
  • Investor
  • San Diego, CA
37
Votes |
96
Posts

Which is the better insurance options

Jen Hoang
  • Investor
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

I'm buying a SFH in Indiana. $90k , 50 yrs old, New AC/furnace, turnkey property.

Got some insurance quotes and trying to figure out which is the better option. Is it enough or too much coverage for an investment property?

Company A:

Dwelling - $100k 

Personal property - $5k

Loss of Rents - $12000

TOTAL premium = $704 ($1000 deductible)

Separate Liability Insurance from Company A:

Occurence $500k

Aggregate $1M

Medical Payments $5k

Total Premium = $100

Company B:

Dwelling - $90k

Loss of Rents - $6600

Liability limits $1M per Occurance/$2M Aggregate

TOTAL Premium : $783.60 ($3000 deductible)

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

90
Posts
53
Votes
BreAnn Stephenson
  • Insurance Agent
  • Kansas City, MO
53
Votes |
90
Posts
BreAnn Stephenson
  • Insurance Agent
  • Kansas City, MO
Replied

Hi Jen!

Some things to consider:

1. Are both property policies written on the same form...i.e. Basic Form has less coverages than Special Form for example. Basic Form doesn't include Theft, Water Damage or Falling Objects for example... If they are different from one another, you'll just be comparing Apples to Oranges...

2. You will also want to know if the policies are written on a Replacement Cost (RC) or Actual Cash Value (ACV) basis. Replacement Cost will make any depreciation they subtract from a claims settlement available to recoup after the repairs are made, vs. ACV where any depreciation will not be able to be reimbursed to you. Depreciation accounts for the usable life left in an item... for example if a roof has a 30 year life and you installed it 10 years ago, in an ACV situation you would only be reimbursed for the 20 years of usable life... in other words, they would subtract 33% from what it costs to replace the roof... Again, if not the same, you are comparing Apples to Oranges.

2. Is the Loss of Rents coverage over 12 months or 6 months? In the case above, I would guess that policy A is 12 mos. vs. policy B is 6 months... not really too big of a deal there, but just know that this coverage is usually paid out as it is incurred, meaning that they won't just automatically include that in a payout unless you've actually lost money from having to move your tenant out.

3. I noticed that there is personal property included in policy A. Make sure that this policy is written on the correct form... if it is a Homeowner's policy (HO-x) then really you have the incorrect type of coverage for an investment property. You shouldn't really have a need for personal property coverage unless you are furnishing the place yourself.

4. Difference in liability coverage... what is the cost from company A to match the same limits as company B?

5. Difference in deductibles is really up to what you can handle. A typical rule of thumb is to take the smallest claim you would file and double it.

6. Thinking of insurance as what you will lean on for catastrophic losses will help you as you go along. It's not meant to be there for regular maintenance which should be a part of your planned financial expense for the property. Claims frequency is a killer so reserving your insurance for larger losses will help you retain stable premiums and continuous coverage.

7. Does Company A or Company B specialize in insuring investment properties? Do they offer monthly billing? The ability to insure the property if it goes vacant? Can they insure renovations? How easy is it to add coverage if you keep purchasing? Etc....

Hope that helps!

-BreAnn

Loading replies...