Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Insurance
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago,

User Stats

84
Posts
11
Votes
Charles Coaston
  • Pittsburgh, PA
11
Votes |
84
Posts

Would this be a a grantor under a quit claim deed

Charles Coaston
  • Pittsburgh, PA
Posted

I have a question in my real estate book that just doesn't seem right.

Which of the following parties to real estate transactions would have the greatest exposure to liability?

1. The grantor under a special warranty deed

2. The grantor under a quit claim deed

3. The grantor under a trustee's deed

4. The grantor under a general warranty deed

My book is saying its a number 4. Is that correct and why? I'm i reading the question wrong? If its a liability would it be a quit claim deed?

Loading replies...