Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Insurance
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

295
Posts
34
Votes
Burt L.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Steamboat, CO
34
Votes |
295
Posts

What Level of Building Coverage Does a Landlord Really Need?

Burt L.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Steamboat, CO
Posted

WhIen speaking to insurance agents they ask me how much building coverage do I need? I have no idea but I'm told that $200 per sq ft is replacement cost in the greater metro area. 

Does appraised value or loan value have any relavance? An agent today said that a lender will want at least as much coverage as the amount of the loan but that they don't insure loans, just the structure and so the amount of the loan isn't relevant. But lender underwriting could have a loud voice on this, too.  For tax allocations purposes its often accepted that 20% of the value is allocated to non-burnable land which would indicate that 80% of the value of the entire property should be the building coverage policy amount. 

In my current case, I 'm also told that since the lower two units of the property are considered below grade even though only one side "has dirt" against these walkout level units, that I only have to insure the units above grade and not the lowers as they are considered basement space. 

What do experienced people usually choose as the value to insure for building coverage? There doesn't seem to be much standardization in this area and the agents seem to be looking to me -perhaps to overinsure - I don't know. 

Hearing the different viewpoints starts to make the headspin....What is the more-accepted practice?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,494
Posts
1,431
Votes
Jason Bott
#2 Insurance Contributor
  • Insurance Agent
  • Nationwide
1,431
Votes |
2,494
Posts
Jason Bott
#2 Insurance Contributor
  • Insurance Agent
  • Nationwide
Replied

@Burt L.

You need to first start with your lender.  If they are going to require a Replacement Cost Estimator, and require you to insure to that limit, that is your answer.

If they only require the loan limit covered, than it is up to you to figure out if you want to insure to the full limit of the building, or some % of it.  If you insure too far below the estimated Replacement Cost, you could be penalized for being underinsured at claim time.

I don't agree that your exposed lower level should be excluded from your valuation.  If there is a claim in those lower units, do you want the policy to extend coverage?  If so, then include them in your valuation.  If they are "storage" and have little value, then you can self insure for the value of that space.

Hope that helps you with the valuation.

  • Jason Bott
  • Loading replies...