Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Wholesaling
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

471
Posts
95
Votes
Robert Burns
  • Wholesaler
  • Baton Rouge, LA
95
Votes |
471
Posts

Cold Calling vs. Texting for Motivated Sellers

Robert Burns
  • Wholesaler
  • Baton Rouge, LA
Posted

What's the opinion out there on the success of cold calling vs. texting to find motivated sellers? I'm using a filtered Non owner occupied vacant list in my target areas!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

95
Posts
52
Votes
Chase Lowry
Pro Member
  • Cleveland
52
Votes |
95
Posts
Chase Lowry
Pro Member
  • Cleveland
Replied

News Flash... They both work. Be careful if you go the texting route, you could get into some very hot water. If you have the time and patience utilize SEO. In SEO you are not reaching out to "motivated" sellers the motivated sellers come to you. If this sounds like something that interests you hit up, Jerryll Noorden... Guys something else.

  • Chase Lowry
  • Loading replies...