Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Wholesaling
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

158
Posts
23
Votes
George Frye
  • Investor
  • Albany, GA
23
Votes |
158
Posts

Subject To and Insurance

George Frye
  • Investor
  • Albany, GA
Posted

When doing a subject to, so you normally keep the insurance in the owner's name? If you don't keep it in the owner's name how do you not trigger the due on sales clause?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

393
Posts
995
Votes
Ben Zimmerman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Raleigh, NC
995
Votes |
393
Posts
Ben Zimmerman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Raleigh, NC
Replied
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

I'm relatively certain that you have it backwards.  You would want to be the primary and the seller would be the additional insured.  The way you have it written I'm fairly certain after the house is sold subject to, the previous seller could simply light the place on fire and collect the insurance check.

Loading replies...