Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Wholesaling
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

295
Posts
34
Votes
Burt L.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Steamboat, CO
34
Votes |
295
Posts

My Buyers Each Wanted This Three-plex, Until it Became Apparent It Was Only a Legal Duplex!

Burt L.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Steamboat, CO
Posted

I have a three-plex under contract that each buyer who has seen it has said they like the numbers on and want the property. It is priced at 215K and has rents of $2,050 which are easily increased to $2,500-$2600.

Its become apparent that its only a legal duplex and I didn't see any issues as it has three electric meters, three mailboxes and the address at public records vaguely reads Units A,B,C. Unfortunately, they list it as a 2 bed, 2ba instead of 5 bed, 3 ba.

Now each of the buyers has backed out as they can close with hard money, but cant get enough money back out on refi to get a decent ROI. Its zoned for two units and the seller across the street had the same problem after converting his duplex to a fourplex by separating the basements of each unit. In this case, it was an upstairs/downstairs duplex, which the owner combined, to pull a permit to convert a three-car garage to another living unit. He then re-separated the duplex into two units and I now see that one of the electric meters is just for outside lighting now.

Lenders wont leave their desks to see that the other building exists, although I have provided the building permit history for it. Of course, the owner has benefitted by having lower taxes in the meantime.

The owner will turn 80 years of age in a month, and is an old farmer who doesn't care about permitting, appraisers, lenders, etc. He knows its worked for a three-plex for many years and claims its "grandfathered in". He has offered owner financing at 4% but wants 80K down and likely no more than a 10 year balloon. If it were through a bank, one wouldn't have to put so much down, hurting ROI again. I don't much about wholesaling something with owner financing and this doesn't look so positive anymore.

Any suggestions for this "non-conforming" property that so many buyers formerly wanted?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,456
Posts
951
Votes
Patrick L.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Saint Petersburg, FL
951
Votes |
1,456
Posts
Patrick L.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Saint Petersburg, FL
Replied

Burt L. The reason the buyers aren't willing to pay for the 3rd unit is that it doesn't appear to be a legal unit. If the city becomes aware of it through a complaint, future permits/inspections, etc they make force the owner to remove the extra unit (especially if the zoning is for a maximum of 2 units). I've seen that happen plenty of times here to investors that have split up units or converted a garage at a multi family property. As an investor it doesn't matter that the third unit is "there" it doesn't add much value to me if it's not legal or I can't easily make it legal. I'm not going to put money into it knowing I can be forced to later remove it.

Loading replies...