Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Wholesaling
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 12 years ago,

User Stats

9
Posts
1
Votes
Mitch Monmouth
  • Seattle, WA
1
Votes |
9
Posts

Detroit numbers - what's missing?

Mitch Monmouth
  • Seattle, WA
Posted

I find many listings in Detroit Metro suburbs that appear to have a 30% cash-on-cash rental value - e.g. $40K in a decent neighborhood with $1100/mo rental value.

I'm sure some of these require work that would reduce that, but it still seems an astronomically high return. Any investor would probably be happy to buy such properties outright, provided the vacancy rates are low and the neighborhood isn't being abandoned, which at least for these listings is true.

Am I missing something? As we all know - if it seems too good...

Loading replies...